C3C Jacobi Owens
Capt Kirchhoff – M3
6 Feb 2015
Philos Paper The content of this paper is coming from the Republic written by Plato. This book can be found in the text Classics of Moral and Political Theory written by Micheal L. Morgan. I will be critiquing Glaucon’s argument for his definition of justice. The foundation of my analysis comes from Socrates definition of a soul and justice; being that justice is bitrinsic. I plan to prove this by analyzing Glaucon’s argument while also showing you what Socrates has to say on the matter. Then finally I will give my thoughts on what justice really is. Glaucon defined what justice is before he delivered his argument. He says 358a “That is not what the masses think. On the contrary, they think it is of the burdensome kind: the one that must be practiced for the sake of the rewards and the popularity that are the consequences of a good reputation but that is to be avoided as intrinsically burdensome.” I believe this definition is a good one in terms of its focus. Glaucon is saying that justice is extrinsic, being that people only practice justice for the sake of something else. That something else in this case is: money, rewards, good reputation, the hearts of others, etc. Glaucon set up his argument with three different points he wanted prove. The first point he deliberated on was what people considered justice to be and its origins. The second point he discussed was whether people actually practice justice willingly for the sake of good. The third point Glaucon talked about why people do not practice justice for the sake of the good but act like they do. Glaucon stated a few premises that ultimately led up to his conclusion of what people considered justice to be.
The first point Glaucon talks about is the base of his argument, 358c “People say, you see, that to do injustice is naturally good and to suffer injustice bad. But the badness of suffering it far exceeds the goodness of doing it. Hence those who have done and suffered injustice and who have tasted both—the ones who lack the power to do it and avoid suffering it—decide that it is profitable to come to an agreement with each other neither to do injustice nor to suffer it. As a result, they begin to make laws and covenants; and what the law commands, they call lawful and just.” The first set of premises for Glaucon’s conclusion of the origin of justice is very convincing to me. I only say this because this conclusion sounds exactly like law in America. We, as a society, make laws to protect the people from other people. Whether it is government versus the people or people versus other people, the laws in America were made to protect the people from the wrong doings of others. This is what Glaucon is getting at when he says 358c “the ones who lack the power to do it and avoid suffering it—decide that it is profitable to come to an agreement with each other…”
Glaucon began to make his greatest claim while trying to prove his second point. He stated the premise and conclusion that people only practice justice because they lack the power to do injustice (committing crimes without impunity). He then began to explain his first example. Glaucon explained 358c “suppose we grant to the just and the unjust person the freedom to do whatever they like. We can then follow both of them and see where their appetites would lead. And we will catch the just person red-handed, traveling the same road as the unjust one.” The reason for this conclusion he explains 358c “is the desire to do better than others.” He then brought up the Myth of Gyges of Lydia. This myth is a story about a man who acquired the power to become invisible. The man used this power to seduce a king’s wife and attack his kingdom with her help and take over the kingdom. This is where Glaucon proposed the situation of having two rings, one given to the just man and one to the unjust. Glaucon then preceded 360c “And in so behaving, he would do no differently than the
Thrasymachus and Glaucon about justice and unjustice. In this essay, I shall argue that Plato’s solution of the temptation of the ring is successful in a few ways. I will describe Thrasymachus and Glaucon’s idea about justice, and how Socrates discuss with them in terms of the justice of the city, justice of individual soul, his theory of forms and the importance of the knowledge of the good, and the sun analogy and the allegory of the cave. While Socrates discuss with Glaucon about just and unjust…
Behind the wall are people, like puppeteers, who carry all sorts of articles like statues of men and other living things which they hold above the wall. Some of the bearers speak and others are silent, as you might expect.” “I see,” said Glaucon [Socrates’ student]. “Truly a strange place and strange sort of people.” “Actually, they are just like ourselves.” Socrates explained, “What do you think these chained men would know of themselves or each other or anything…
the temptation to misuse power for ones own purposes. But even within the blackest soul, there is recognition of what the concept of justice is about. As we decipher what the nature of justice is with philosopher’s Glaucon and Socrates who have different understandings of what justice is to us. Where Cicero, characterize the natures of justice, to complete a true understanding on what nature is it to be just. Glaucon explain that justice should belong to the most humble man, how shouldn’t expect…
Socrates’s objection is incorrect, then one possible explanation for this is that different people have different views about what is just and what is not. To conclude, Socrates’s argument was that the idea of a “justice” is to maintain a harmony in the soul, so that all its parts (desires, spirit and reason) do not intervene in each other’s work. Also, he mentioned that a just person never acts without this inner harmony. However, from my personal perspective, the knowledge about the idea of a “justice”…
individual story. “The Allegory of the Cave” is set up in a dialogue formation between Socrates and Glaucon. As the story begins, Socrates is talking to Glaucon one of his students asking him to, “Imagine men to be living in an underground cavelike dwelling place, which has a way up to the light along it’s whole width, but the entrance is a long way up.” (Solomon 67) He continues with having Glaucon picture these men being here for their whole entire life, chained, and only being able to see what’s…
by intellectuals Cephalus, Plymarchus, Thrasymachus and Glaucon, Socrates gives his theory of justice according to which it is a sort of specialization (Plato, p.14). Individually, justice is a human virtue that makes a person self-consistent and “good”; socially, justice is a consciousness that makes society internally harmonious. Socrates uses two specific analogies to examine his definition of justice: The division of parts of the human soul as well as the parts of the state. Rather than to behaviour…
the analogy makes any sense. The obvious answer is yes, it does make sense, but before we dive into this topic, a proper explanation of the allegory of the sun is needed. The origins of the allegory comes from a conversation between Socrates and Glaucon, Plato’s older brother. Within this discussion, Socrates brings forth the idea that the sun represents the good, and that the sun is God-like. It is further explained that the sun “makes our sight see best and visible things best seen.” (Reeve &…
Definition: It granted its owner the power to become invisible at will. Purpose: A just man and an unjust man will act the same given a Ring of Gyges. Once in possession of this ring, the man can act unjustly with no fear of reprisal. No one can deny, Glaucon claims, that even the most just man would behave unjustly if he had this ring. He would indulge all of his materialistic, power-hungry, and erotically lustful urges. This tale proves that people are only just because they are afraid of punishment…
disadvantages of this type of city are people do not have the ability to choose their own lifestyle, wealth or occupation. Much of the citizen’s lives who live in the “healthy” city would be predetermined from birth and this could lead to unhappiness. Glaucon points out that the type of city is impossible and he even goes on to call it the “city of pigs” since people naturally have both necessary and unnecessary needs. Continuing this further, he argues that people naturally have a desire to want more…
Taylor O’Gara Humanities: World Views 3.3.12 Essay One In “The Cave” by the philosopher Plato, he talks about the ideas of finding the truth in life. In this historic reading, there are various examples of symbolism that help get Plato’s ideas across to the reader. Through his uses of shadows, the sun, prisoners and the cave, we are able to see how before people find the truth, they are stuck in an ignorant state of what they perceive the…