Shays' Rebellion, the post-Revolutionary clash between New England farmers and merchants that tested the precarious institutions of the new republic, threatened to plunge the "disunited states" into a civil war. The rebellion arose in Massachusetts in 1786, spread to other states, and culminated in an abortive attack on a federal arsenal.
It wound down in 1787 with the election of a more popular governor, an economic upswing, and the creation of the Constitution of the United States in Philadelphia.
Shay's Rebellion was the first armed uprising of the new nation. It was caused by the absence of debt relief legislation in Massachusetts. When the Revolution ended, merchants and creditors lobbied for high taxes and against paper money. They were successful. These procreditor polices underminded farmers' finances. The legislation, including foreclosure laws, were extremely taxing to farmers and caused many to go into great debt. Many farmers were dragged to court where they faced high legal fees and threats of imprisonment because of their debt. In 1786, farmers in Massachusetts attended extralegal meetings where they protested against high taxes and aggressive eastern creditors. Bands of angry farmers joined together to close law courts with force and freed debtors and fellow protesters from jail. Resistance to the legislation climbed to a full-scale revolt. John Adams, president at the time, answered with the Riot Act, which outlawed illegal assemblies. The rebellion was suppressed by military force. The rebellion prompted leaders with
2) Economic crisis: high taxes, mounting debt
A series of tax revolts by Massachusetts farmers against the Massachusetts legislature in 1786-1787. national perspective to redouble their efforts and create a stronger central government.
After the Revolutionary War, the Massachusetts legislature imposed high taxes to pay war debts. Rural farmers could not pay their taxes and faced forfeiture of their farms. Resentment of the taxes increased to the point that the farmers began to break up court sessions to prevent judges from ruling that specific farms should be sold to pay tax bills.
These minor acts of rebellion turned violent in January 1787 when Daniel Shays, a farmer and Revolutionary War veteran, led 1200 people into Springfield to seize weapons from a national government arsenal. Massachusetts State military troops quickly put down the rebellion, but the event shocked the nation at the time. Shays' Rebellion hinted that law and order were seriously breaking down across the new United States to the extent that the national government, under the Articles of Confederation, could not even protect its own arsenal.
Shays' Rebellion kindled the people's desire to form stronger national government which could enforce law, keep order, and solve the problems facing the developing United States.
3Yes, I feel that the arguments presented in this essay were very strong and well supported. There was a lot of information and facts, however, in my opinion that created a problem. The article was almost too informative and gave way to a boring paper. I disliked the presentation of information because of the lack of interest that was displayed. The whole thing seemed to drag-on. Although, I did like the way the text was structured because on the introduction that provided me with clarity of what was to come as well as the easy reading level. Both of those aspects did make the assignment easier to accomplish.
4) This
Related Documents: United States and Central Government Essay
**A law is only as good as its enforcement** Earliest inhabitants Natives had been living in U.S. 30,000 years prior to European settlement by colonists Colonists brought disease & pushed natives westward through warfare Types of government Monarchy-Government in which power is vested in hereditary kings and queens Belgium, Netherlands, Spain, Japan, Thailand Totalitarianism-Tyrant rules North Korea Jong & Mussolini Oligarchy-Right to participate depends on the possessions of wealth,…
competing basic political philosophies have always existed throughout the United States’ history; one seeking to increase the power of the central government, and one seeking to decrease it. During the 1800s, the two philosophies were played out by the Federalist and the Republican parties conflicting in many different ways. The Federalists, represented by Alexander Hamilton, promoted the importance of a strong central government to succeed in the world, while the Republicans, represented by Thomas Jefferson…
30 September 2014 APUSH Federalist Vs AntiFederalist Throughout the history of the United States there have always been opposing political parties. One of the parties was the Federalist party. Members from this group believed in a strong and central government. The opposing party was called the AntiFederalists and the believed that there should be a weak central government Opposing parties are essential to a functioning government because they create another step in our checks and balances system. While both parties were very different…
A Stronger Government for a New Country The Articles of Confederation were successful in unifying the independent colonies during the American Revolution but did not adequately provide a strong central government, so were therefore nearly completely replaced by the Constitution, which more specifically outlined powers of the government. The weak and ineffective Articles resulted in the Constitutional Convention meeting in Philadelphia on May 25, 1787 to create a new form of government. A total of…
political ideologies. I believe that a strong central government will surely benefit these United States, leading to an effective government. In acknowledging and understanding factors such as national debt, bringing this country to the top will not be an impossible feat. Putting power into a central government is similar to a building a sturdy base to a house of cards. If the foundation is weak, the house will eventually fall. With the strong central government acting in the interests of commerce and…
Confederation gave the US government very little power over very essential things, such as taxation and raising an army. Without the power to impose taxes, the central government had a hard time paying off its debts to other countries and paying its soldiers that fought in the war. It also severely limited the effectiveness of the central government by requiring 9 out of 13 votes for a law to pass while 13 out of 13 had to agree for amending a law. The central government only had one branch, the legislature…
checks and balances, big states against little states. If there was nothing guarding the constitution against tyranny we would have lots of problems regarding the law, how the government controls the money, and military spending. Federalism the division of power between the central government and the states. There are many things that the central government has control over as well the states do. The central government has control over declaring war. (Doc. A) The government wants to make sure that…
federalism for the United States? Compare American federalism with other systems of government (i.e., unitary and confederal)? Federalism is our system of government in which power is distributed between a central governing authority and sub-divisional (state) governing authorities. While it may seem that only lately there has been a significant debate over the role of government and their scope of power, in reality federalism has always been a fusion of other preexisting government systems and finding…
centrally planned economy that was a hallmark of the state-controlled economy and then its replacement by an economy operating on the basis of market forces. Some of the former communist states of Central Europe began their process of economic transition two years before Russia and have provided positive models. But Russia lacks experience with market economies and the institutions needed to operate them. Moreover, deeply en-trenched remnants of central planning present challenges in Russia that other…
military tactics including ambushes, sabotage, raids, petty warfare 2. Nationalism: Patriotic feeling, principles, or efforts. 3. Self-Determination: The process by which a country determines its own statehood and forms its own allegiances and government. 4. Propaganda: Information, espically of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. 5. Contraband: Goods that have been imported or exported illegally. 6. U-Boat: A German submarine…