Brianna Safarewitz
30 September 2014
APUSH
Federalist Vs AntiFederalist
Throughout the history of the United States there have always been opposing political parties. One of the parties was the Federalist party. Members from this group believed in a strong and central government. The opposing party was called the AntiFederalists and the believed that there should be a weak central government Opposing parties are essential to a functioning government because they create another step in our checks and balances system.
While both parties were very different, they both cared deeply about the future of the United
States and they wanted to make the United States as perfect as it could be.
The Federalist party believed that a strong and central government would be best for the
United States because the states were so large in size that it would be easiest to unify them under one government instead of individual state governments. Even though we had just gotten out of a war with a country that had a central government, they were not afraid of the idea and thought it would be best for the states. They eventually won, because we have a strong central government that the Federalists would be proud of. The Federalist party was made up primarily of upper class citizens. Their argument was that the United States needed a stronger government because it was, “a necessary improvement on the Articles of Confederation,” (Citation 1). While the AntiFederalists also wanted an improvement on the Articles of Confederation, but in another way. The AntiFederalists believed that the United States would do better if they were not
unified under a strong, central government, because they did not want another tyrannical government like the one they just fought and defeated in the War for Independence. The
AntiFederalists also believed that the states should be united in some circumstances, but thought that each state should be it’s own government. Their reasoning was that the states were all so different in culture and environment that it would be nearly impossible to do anything in government that could be agreed on by the majority of states. Typically, you could find that the
AntiFederalist party was made of middle to lower middle class citizens, and we can assume that they did not want a central government because they did not want to pay higher taxes. Some of the AntiFederalists were local politicians that,
Related Documents: Federalist AntiFederalist Essay
the people. The two groups of people who disagreed with each other were known as the Antifederalists and the Federalists. When it came to the House of Representatives, the two groups shared different opinions. The greatest difference in opinion was the number of representatives. The Antifederalists shared many concerns about how the House of Representatives would fairly represent the people. The Antifederalists were scared that a small number of representatives would be unsafe for the public interest…
constitution. These two groups were called the federalists and the antifederalists. Both of these groups arguments have lead to the type of government we have today in America. A famous argument between the federalists and the antifederalists was how much power the national government should get. The federalists believed in a strong national government while the antifederalists believed they were taking away too much power from the states. The federalists believed if they had a strong central government…
state governments and would be distrustful of a strong central government. They noted that the Constitution proposal lacked limitations to the government’s power. Anti- Federalists, as the opposition became known, advocated the continuation of state governments because they came with a guarantee on the limitation of power. Anti-Federalists maintained the notion that such a centralized government would not voice the interests of the people. It was written to the Pennsylvania Convention that the Constitution…
Jersey plans could not be agreed upon and how did the came to a compromise under the Great Compromise. Furthermore, what changes did the new Constitution provided and how did it solve the Article of Confederation flaws. Finally, how the Federalist and Anti-federalist viewed the new Constitution and how were they disagree with each other will be explained. The Articles of Confederation provided the then new states, a form of government. However, due to their fear of a strong central government, the…
I am on the side of the federalists. Federalists believed that the constitution was perfect the way it was. Antifederalist disagreed and preferred a weaker government. “In framing a government which is to be administered by men over men, the great difficulty lies in this: you must first enable the government to control the governed; and in the next place oblige it to control itself.” I think in this quote it stresses why the constitution had to be made the way it was. First off we needed a document…
these concerns into consideration. 2. Read Patrick Henry's Speech before the Virginia Convention (Links to an external site.) and Alexander Hamilton's The Federalist (Links to an external site.). a. Summarize the Federalist position advocated by Hamilton and the Antifederalist stance advocated by Patrick Henry. Alexander Hamilton’s federalist position advocated a new constitution of the USA that formed a union for the purposes of safety and welfare of the country, as well as government, liberty,…
didn’t over rule each other Electoral Collage-a group selected bythe states to elect a president and a v.p, in which each state’s number of electors is equal to the number of its senetors and representators in the congress Chapter 5- Section 3 Federalist and…
achieved peace treaty with Great Britain, develop territories for statehood and made department that became president’s cabinet. There were two major groups at that time: federalists and antifederalists. Federalists were loose constructionists and wealthy merchants who supported the constitution. On the other hand antifederalists were farmers and laborers with strict constructionists who wanted a Bill of Rights to protect the rights of individuals. There was Constitutional convention which James…
cooperative federalism | | | new federalism | | | competitive federalism | Question 3 | People who favor state or local action rather than national action are known as | | centralists | | | decentralists | | | lobbyists | | | federalists | Question 4 | Gibbons v. Ogden was important because it | | fully developed the concept of judicial review | | | fully developed the concept of dual citizenship | | | established the supremacy of the national government in all matters…
damage or demolish their ship. He says that historians view the Bill of Rights as a “tub” that the Federalists threw to the Antifederalists so that they would not be tempted to pursue amendments to the Constitution that would have weakened or even destroyed it. The author says, that historians claim James Madison was motivated to pass the Bill of Rights for three reasons: to stop the Antifederalists from altering the power of the federal government; to win support for the constitution from states…