Federalist: United States and Strong Central Government Essay
Submitted By devinsaranitnos
Words: 878
Pages: 4
Devin Sarantinos
Period 2
September 24th, 2014
APUSH
Mr. Panish
Federalists and Republicans
Prompt:
Compare and contrast the basic political and economic philosophies of the Federalists, represented by Hamilton, and the Republicans, represented by Jefferson and Madison.
Two competing basic political philosophies have always existed throughout the United States’ history; one seeking to increase the power of the central government, and one seeking to decrease it. During the 1800s, the two philosophies were played out by the Federalist and the Republican parties conflicting in many different ways. The Federalists, represented by Alexander Hamilton, promoted the importance of a strong central government to succeed in the world, while the Republicans, represented by Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, promoted the importance a smaller central government. Although the Federalists and Republicans had some similar principles on political and economic philosophies, they differed greatly in many areas.
While the Federalist and Republicans have contrasting opinions about the size of the central government, both parties agreed that the central government needed more power than it previously had under the Articles of Confederation. Federalists’ belief was that for a strong country, it was required that the country have a strong central government. Under this form of government it had the power to control commerce, tax, declare war, and make treaties. Whereas the Republicans believed that they had to limit national control and give more power to the state governments; for the primary reason to maintain individuals rights. The Republicans were mostly composed of commoners rather than the Federalists who tended to be more wealthy and powerful. Because of this, the Republicans were afraid of a strong central government and as a result being taken advantage of. The Republicans believed that if a government was too strong there would be almost no power in state governments, which would highly limit an individual’s freedom. While both parties disagreed on the role that the central government should play in the new Country, they agreed that the central government needed more power than it had under the Articles of Confederation. Under the Articles, the Central government had little to no power to do anything. Instances such as Shays Rebellion demonstrated that the Central Government could not even support its own States and put down a somewhat small rebellion. Because of rebellions and instances such as these, both the Federalists and Republicans agreed that the central government should have more power. But again it is highly debated on how much power should be distributed and received.
Other issues that were highly debated by the two parties were the subjects of national debt and a national bank. Both Hamilton and Jefferson agreed that paying off debt was a large factor to creating a strong economy but they differed on the ways that it should be paid off. Hamilton a “financial wizard” created a plan called the Assumption Plan to pay off the states debt from the war. He figured that the “states debts were regarded as a proper national obligation” and therefore the national government should assume all the states debts. Jefferson was not a hundred percent opposed against this, but felt that if the U.S. assumed all the states debt, then there would be little money to create security for the new country. He also felt that national debt was a tool by which the rich would overtake the nation with excessive spending, and would create an excuse to create an overly powerful central government. Hamilton was
Related Documents: Federalist: United States and Strong Central Government Essay
Brianna Safarewitz 30 September 2014 APUSH Federalist Vs AntiFederalist Throughout the history of the United States there have always been opposing political parties. One of the parties was the Federalist party. Members from this group believed in a strong and central government. The opposing party was called the AntiFederalists and the believed that there should be a weak central government Opposing parties are essential to a functioning government because they create another step in our checks and balances system…
Constitution of 1787, there were three main opinions. The Federalists believed the Constitution was perfect and did not need any more changes before ratifying. The Anti-Federalists opinion was that there needed to be more rights for individual citizens added to the Constitution and a greater balance between the central government and states. The third opinion was pro-citizen and wanted a loose central government and stronger state governments in order to protect the people. All three opinions agreed…
the late 18th century, America had finally broken off from Britain’s control and was looking for a new form of government. Originally, the Articles of Confederation connected the founding thirteen states of America, which was a beginner version of a constitution. This eventually became an issue since these articles did not give any power to the central government. Because of this, the states had many problems in international politics since they had just found freedom and did not have the respect of…
1776-1787 The various state constitutions, with their various degrees of popular sovereignty, laid the groundwork for efforts to create a stronger national government. Congress had been exercising de facto constitutional authority since 1776 and, despite its limited powers, successfully planned the settlement of the trans-Appalachian West. Congress established the Northwest Territory and issued ordinances affecting the settlement and administration of western lands. State governments emerged from the…
The Contrasting Opinions of the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists The Article of Confederation was the first new government for independent state. Under the Article of Confederation, the state government held most power. There were many weaknesses of the first government including lacking the power to tax and regulate trade between the states. So people decided to change it. At that time the Constitution wrote by James Madison was came out. When it came to ratification, some delegates at…
for the United States of America was long and difficult. The Articles of Confederation we weak and had to be replaced. Two groups fought for what they believed was the right form of government for the new constitution. These two groups were called the federalists and the antifederalists. Both of these groups arguments have lead to the type of government we have today in America. A famous argument between the federalists and the antifederalists was how much power the national government should get…
every state was required. There was often one or more recalcitrant member of the union. For example, Rhode Island even refused to take part in the framing; opposition to a new constitution was certainly formidable. Consequently, the Convention discarded the provision of unanimous approval and adopted the notion that the new Constitution would pass with only the approval of nine…
When the Federalist party was organized in 1791, those people who favored a strong central government and a loose constitutional interpretation coagulated and followed the ideals of men such as Alexander Hamilton. The first opposition political party in the United States was the Republican party, which held power, nationally, between 1801 and 1825. Those who were in favor of states rights and a strict construction of the constitution fell under the leadership of Thomas Jefferson. These Jeffersonian…
The United States of America was founded on a Constitution that was supposed to preserve our freedoms and certain liberties. All Americans at that time wanted to keep America a free an independent nation with rights for its people. However there was two different groups, the Federalists lead by Alexander Hamilton and the Democratic-Republicans led by Thomas Jefferson, which thought this could be achieved in very different ways. Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton were very different in their…
POLS 320 Writing Assignment Essay 2 Madison’s Federalist 10 is considered a milestone achievement in American political theory because it discusses the control the government should have over its country’s citizens. Madison also explains that the government itself should be regulated because if it isn’t, the government may fall victim to its own power and become too restrictive. Madison stated that the government should be made up of a group of individuals who were appointed to represent their…