1. The Reviewer made an excellent point in reference to personality traits vs. affective states. The Reviewer discussed confusion as to which is the focus of the paper. I agree with the Reviewer that this distinction is important. Therefore, I have included in the literature review a section on personality development and assessment based on the Five-Factor Model of personality. I have also placed greater emphasis on interpersonal theory of personality, specifically outlining how stable personality traits are developed through interpersonal transactions.
2. The Reviewer requested a distinction between depression and anxiety resulting from a CVD diagnosis and symptoms and pre-existing depression and anxiety. I have two responses to this request. Our first is that while this distinction is important, I argue that the NEO-PI-R assesses for enduring personality traits, rather than time or context specific states. Second, I feel that I failed to highlight the fact that our sample was recruited based on healthy status, and exclusion criteria included a CVD diagnosis. The ambulatory symptoms I assessed for are indicators of risk for CVD, and not CVD itself. Therefore, depression and anxiety related to CVD are not a focus of this paper.
3. The Reviewer suggested a clear and deliberate definition of marital quality and marital satisfaction, and I agree that these concepts need to be defined upfront. I have included these definitions, as well as discussions on how these particular constructs relate to interpersonal processes and personality. The Reviewer also suggested tying the concepts of marital satisfaction to childhood attachment security. While I agree that a discussion on childhood attachment security would add to the depth and make the paper more comprehensive, I feel that it is not an essential component, and due to the length restriction it would not be optimal to include it.
4. The Reviewer recommended that I provide a more detailed explanation of how partner personality affects CVD development. While the Reviewer referenced this as a more minor point, I would actually argue that partner effects need to be highlighted as the main focus of the paper. This is because there is scant literature on the effects of partner personality on physiological indicators of CVD development, and my hope is that this study will contribute to this literature and emphasize the need for expansion. Therefore, I have more directly addressed this gap in the literature, and expanded on our discussion of why I reason that partner personality will impact CVD related physiology. I focus primarily on how a
Type Your Name Here! Date: Wednesday, January 21, 2015 &Reading Response # 3 Chapter(s): Mengestu, Chapters 3 & 4 DIRECTIONS: (Do not delete these directions!) After completing the entire reading for the day, answer the first two questions below in fully developed paragraphs (10-12 sentences in each paragraph). Answer thoroughly and in complete sentences. Mind your grammar Κ! This is a formal assignment, so proof read and edit carefully. I want sophisticated answers that demonstrate…
organization of the whole book together. Preparations 1. Review the Chapter 2 Outline available in the Assignment 2 Folder. 2. Review the Chapter 2 Presentation at the course homepage. 3. Read Chapter 2 in the Essentials of Marketing textbook. 4. Visit the Online Learning Center Student Edition and review any/all resources available for Chapter 2. 5. Complete the following WSJ Current Events Exercise: 1. Go to the Procter and Gamble Web site and review the many Brands they market. 2. Go to the Procter and…
support your response. In the Inquiry of a Client's Lawyer Concerning Litigation, Claims, and Assessments, the date by which the lawyer's response should be sent to the auditor. In the CR Brown inquiry the date is not shown. Also, the letter should request the lawyer to specify in his response the latest date covered by his review (the "effective date"). It should be recognized that, to adequately respond to an audit inquiry letter, lawyers will ordinarily employ some internal review procedures which…
Name________________________ Assessment Plan 304 Promote children and young people’s positive behaviour Evidence requirements | Complete() | 1.Signed completed assessment plan (in plastic wallet) | | 2.Review of City and Guilds | | 3.Discussion with Assessor | | 4.Completed assessment form | | 5.Reflective journal | | 6.Checklist signed and completed | | Assessment plan issued date by: | Assessor:Learner: | Date: | | Assessment plan submission plan agreed by: | Assessor:Learner:…
implementation of the Post Incident Analysis (PIA) process to measure the effectiveness during the response to the incident. The result of this research is to suggest the importance of developing guide of line PIA to analyze record and share experiences from incidents response. These lessons learnt can be added to future planning and training exercises by the different agencies of emergency responders. A literature review including recognize fire service textbooks, journals, magazines, online research and different…
Wednesday 10/1 –one hard copy brought to class for peer review Revised Draft Due Monday 10/8 one .doc or .docx copy submitted via Bb journals by 12:30pm; complete project packet due at beginning of class Rewrite Due Monday 10/22 upload .doc or .docx via Bb journals by 12:30pm Source: Carter’s “Barbarian’s Running Late,” personal experience/observation, and any pre-writing work Grading: Paper – 150pts; Packet – 10pts Background: A response essay with summary asks the writer to read rhetorically…
Discussion 1 Peer Review – Annotated Outline 100/100 Resources Discussion Participation Scoring Guide. Guidelines for Effective Peer Review. The purpose of this discussion is to provide, and receive, peer feedback on the Unit 3 assignment, Annotated Outline. In the discussion in Unit 3, you posted your Annotated Outline, along with a brief description of your project direction. This discussion is the next step: providing peer reviews for two of your peers. Post your peer reviews here, with a subject…
MOVIE REVIEW: “HANCOCK” 1 Movie Review: “Hancock” Emanuel Vasquez Professor: Michael Christensen Psychology 1010-004 Utah Valley University February 28, 2013 MOVIE REVIEW: “HANCOCK” 2 Movie Review “Hancock” John Hancock (Will Smith) is a powerful superhero who has become a looser because of his addiction to alcohol and clumsy acts. He has also become the most hated person in Los Angeles. Even though he has saved many lives, he also destroyed many properties, costing the…
breakdown below. Unit Tests 50% Pop Quizzes 20% Reflective Responses 30% The semester grade in the course will average the quarterly results as 80%, with 20% coming from the comprehensive Final Exam. The Reflective Responses are papers written in response to the primary source readings. Each will be a single typed page dealing with an issue that the student finds in the primary source material. One Reflective Response will be written for six of the religions studied this semester. A…