It has been suggested that knowledge is justified, true belief. In other words, in order to know something, you must be able to justify how you know. So, belief is only knowledge if your belief can be supported by any evidence regarding the truth of the premises. This idea comes from Plato’s “Theaetetus” and explored again in Russell’s “Problems of Philosophy.” Furthermore, it is examined in Gettiers “Is Justified, True Belief Knowledge?” Most things, such as knowledge cannot be known unless they are supported and thus, proved to be a knowable truth.
To prove any such premises, one must use the conclusion of another premises, and so on and so forth. What will happen then, when we reach the last of knowable things? The Theaetetus suggests that some things are knowable and some things are not. (Theaetetus 201d) All knowledge comes from a primary source, when such primary elements were formed. These elements cannot be supported, nor proven. We must just accept them as true. Socrate’s points out that, “primary elements, as it were, of which we and everything else are composed, have no account.” (Theaetetus 201d) These, being the axioms: the foundation of belief.
But, how does one begin to believe these axioms without evidence? There is no basis on which they are supported. We see that the primary elements have no explanations, nor evidence to support their claims. It is just so. Which would again, raise the question: How do you know? The answer being, you do not, you just know there is no answer to their questions; No explanation can be derived from any sort of further knowledge. Furthermore, to question the axioms is to question any knowledge at all.
Being caught up in an ongoing circle of debate on knowables and unknowables would cause certain collapse. The only way to avoid this altogether is to realize that for certain aspects of knowledge; one cannot prove the basic elements of belief. We know this to be true beyond a doubt and it is not irresponsible to accept this to be true. Aristotle deems these certainties to be necessarily true, self evident and better known than anything that they could be used to prove. (Ibberson) This basic and non-derivative knowable can be termed ‘intuitive.” (Russell 133) This type of knowledge is accepted as universally true, having no means to prove the truth. An example of this lies in the definition of a straight line, which goes on and on and on.
In gauging things known, one must consider Edmund Gettier’s, “Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?” Gettier shows proof that sometimes, justified true belief is sometimes comes about inadvertently. That is, by pure luck or chance alone. In Gettiers article, he exemplifies Smith and himself (Jones) applying for a job. Smith has a justified belief that “Jones will get the job.” (The President of the company said so.) Smith also has a justified belief that "Jones has ten coins in his pocket". (He counted them.) Smith therefore justifies “the man who will get the job has ten coins in his pocket.” In fact, Jones does not get the job. Instead, Smith himself does. Smith also happens to have ten coins in his pocket. So his belief that “the man who will get the job has ten coins in his pocket” was justified and true for him. But definitely not ultimately true belief because the truth itself was gained through a coincidence.
Chance alone guided this justifiable truth. Truth is sometimes deceptive, being that it could have come from false pre-tenses. We could say that we knew (had knowledge) who
Related Documents: Essay on Philosophy- You Cannot Know
Study Guide for Introduction to Philosophy Midterm 1. What does “philosophy” literally mean? Philosophy literally means the love of wisdom 2. What do the terms, epistemology, metaphysics and ontology mean? Epistemology means the nature of knowledge, Metaphysics is the nature of ultimate reality i.e. god, soul, and substance. Ontology is the ‘what is, how it is, and what makes it what it is’ form of philosophy. 3. Who were the Sophists? What characteristics define them? Sophists are wandering…
Vanessa Gabriel Philosophy 201 The Skeptical Philosophers After having read the allegory of the cave by Plato, Meditations on First Philosophy by Rene Descartes, and The Matrix, I begin to thoroughly understand the meaning of the term skepticism in philosophy. As mentioned by Dew and Foreman, there are varying levels of skepticism, but generally speaking, all skeptics tend to lack trust in the claims of knowledge made by others (Dew and Foreman, 2014, P. 148). The Matrix and both the readings…
the world both philosophy and religion are studies heavily. Although both have completely different definitions and meanings, they provide us with and explanation and knowledge of God. According to Merriam-Webster dictionary, philosophy is defined as being a “pursuit of wisdom”, “a search for a general understanding of values and reality by chiefly speculative rather than observational means”, and “an analysis of the grounds and concepts expressing fundamental beliefs.” Philosophy is a unique type…
Phil 1011 Quay Rice 28 March 2013 Sources of error All philosophers since philosophy began as had a different philosophy on philosophy; therefore they must have some sort of reasoning behind the differences in philosophy, also known as a source of error within the other philosopher’s philosophy. That being said, in order to fully understand the differences in the different philosopher’s philosophy one must begin by examining each philosopher. We will begin our diagnosis by considering René…
Peter Nolan Professor Daniel Shannon Introduction to Philosophy November 24, 2014 God & the Necessity of Evil In Rene Descartes Meditation IV, he explores the problem of error (evil) and why he is “subject to an infinitude of errors”(20) when it is inconsistent to believe that God, the most perfect being, would be directly responsible for evil through the creation of defective creatures. By analyzing Descartes premises in Meditation IV, I will demonstrate how he has truly solved the problem of…
These teachers claim to be talking about truth but they stray away from it immediately; no one knows the future not even Homer. These teachers claim that if people will follow them these teachers will show them exactly what will happen in their futures. They claim they don’t want money but that’s what their whole world revolves around. All of this dishonesty really damages their reputation and know one believes them. These teachers are the biggest hypocrites ever, and we should dismiss their studies…
Walter Kaufmann once said, “philosophy means liberation from the - routine, soaring above the well known, seeing it in new perspectives, arousing wonder and the wish to fly.” I think this quote means that philosophy is the path that leads us to examine and change our lives for the better. Philosophy all began with the classic greeks when they started studying human behavior. They divided the art of philosophy into three main categories, which are metaphysics, logic, and ethics. Metaphysics is the…
ii) Do you agree/disagree with the argument/ideas? Within the Westphal's paper he has many different opinions expressed by not only himself but other philosophers to help to explain why there was a shift from the traditional theological philosophy to the philosophy of religion. The ideas that Westphal expresses within his paper about the emergence of the modern philosophy of religion have to agree with, such as his idea of the Kernel and the Husk. On the other hand some of the key thinkers that Westphal…
any errors or omissions. Philosophy HZT4U-A Unit 2 Introduction, page 1 Introduction In Unit 1, you considered the views of several philosophers about the question “What is reality?” You may have found one answer or another particularly enlightening, but you would still be justified in asking a further question: “On second thought, how does anyone know for sure what the nature of reality is?” An excellent follow-up question is, “What does the word ‘know’ mean? And what guarantee do…
purpose of the Myth of Er is to emphasize one of the points that Plato has been making throughout this whole book, that philosophy, or the quest for knowledge is essential in order to have a successful existence, either as a person or a group of people. One cannot work towards something until and unless he knows what that thing is and how to get there. It is only possible to study philosophy up to the point where one fully understands the Form of the Good, which is the ultimate form. Because of there being…