The English Revolution without Cromwell Oliver Cromwell was the leader of the “New Model Army,” formed by the English Parliament and their Scottish allies. Together, all of them were able to bring the monarch to justice, freeing the people of England from the tyranny of the monarch. Without Cromwell, there wouldn’t have been a commonwealth, Canada would be completely different, and the British wouldn’t be as high up as we see them today.
Charles I was the son of James I, taking the throne in 1625. Like his father, he believed in the “Divine Right of Kings,” ruling as if he was a god. He was always short on money, and alienated many of his possible future supporters. The extravagance in his lifestyle led him to demand more money from parliament and the people, while also requesting funds for his wars. Parliament refused after already providing large proportions of cash and legal tender. Parliament decided to only agree after Charles signs the “Petition of Rights” in 1628, informing the king that he could not levy taxes without Parliamentary consent. He didn’t care at all, and continued following his narrow minded decisions without a second thought. From 1637 forward, he created many problems for himself, including the alienation of the Scottish people. Finally, Charles’ failure to arrest and execute the Parliamentary leaders as traitors created the revolution.
Assuming that the Parliament and the citizens were unable to stop Charles’ reign, many different scenarios could be played out. One could be that King Charles I rules England with an iron fist as the people suffer under his every careless mistake. The streets are ridden with thieves and ne’er do wells, the lucky ones were able to get out of the country, and the economy gradually falls into a depression. Without Oliver Cromwell, this may have happened in place of the history we know today. Canada’s development would also be affected, creating an only French country. Without Cromwell, England wouldn’t know if it could go on without a monarch and what it would be like to be ruled by a dictator or by a commonwealth
Related Documents: English Revolution Without Cromwell Essay
loans. Also they could not raise taxes without parliamentary consent. No one could be imprisoned without a cause. Also no troops could be quartered in private homes. Charles I ruled from 1605-1649. During his reign, the Scottish rebellion took place in 1637. In 1641 the Irish rebellion took place. Parliament issued “Great Remonstrance” which was complaints about King Charles in 1649. In January 1642 Charles invaded Parliament with troops. The English Civil War took place in 1642 and ended…
review SECTION 1 1. Commonwealth – the Cromwell controlled parliament, known as the rump parliament, abolished the monarchy and the house of the lords. It proclaimed England a commonwealth or republic. Constitution – a document outlining the basic laws and principles that govern a nation. 2. Charles I – a king who believed in the divine right of kings Petition of right – a petition stating 4 ancient liberties, (1) the king could not tax the people without the agreement of parliament, (2) he could…
approximately 130,373 square kilometers (50,337 square miles). Government Structure: During the later years (around 1680's), the power of the English monarchy was confined. The involvement of an active parliament was introduced.The monarch was to be under the law and rule by Parliament's consent, which would meet every three years. Economic Situation: The English economic structure in the seventeenth century was characterized by: Mercantilism: England received imports and manufactured goods from their…
something that has always been fought over and one power struggle was that of the English monarchy and Parliament. Under the Stuart rule, Parliament was dissolved and restored, there was a civil war, kings lost their thrones as well as their heads, and there was a military dictatorship, a secret alliance and a king fleeing to another country. These clashes between king and Parliament resulted in a revolution. The Glorious Revolution transformed England from an absolute monarchy to a limited constitutional…
Was Oliver Cromwell a hero or a villain? Its answer is really hard to clarify even for some scholars who have had dissimilar opinions about it and have been arguing about him for centuries. Cromwell has became seen as a devil incarnate, duelled fanatic, hero and man of God. For some historians such as Thomas Carlyle and Samuel Rawson Gardiner, Oliver Cromwell was a hero of liberty while to some others such as David Hume and Christopher Hill he was a regicidal dictator. But, the controversial vision…
Consolidation of National Gov./ Age of Absolutism 1.) During the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, states in northern Europe organized themselves in order to dominate European politics and become great powers. 2.) These nations believed different ways of government such as a parliamentary monarchy in England, or political absolutism, in France. 3.) These changes in politics created major powers by the mid-eighteenth century, these powers being: Great Britain, France, Austria, Prussia, and Russia…
1. Why did monarchs in the late 16th/early 17th centuries need new sources of income? Why did monarchs wish to get their income without the permission of the nobility? 2. Explain the role that each of the following played in the failure of England achieving absolutism, as well as the success of the French: England France · Religion - Religion · Parliament/Tradition…
England according to Parliament and the English laws and customs. Parliament also made sure to limit royal power by creating a Bill of Rights. Then, after 1688, no British monarch could ever rule without getting the consent of Parliament beforehand. These few examples help show how England was changed into ruling with a limited monarchy. One reason the English decided to change their political systems was because of the English Civil War between Oliver Cromwell and King Charles I. King Charles 1…
the Tudor Dynasty. The modern outlook on this supported by the views of J.L. Mackie is that time played the biggest factor and it was a gradual change, though this is opposed by the traditionalist view of Elton who considers there to be, ‘a Tudor Revolution in Government between 1533-1540’1. There are key factors which affect the question such as the role of parliament and religion which need addressing to be able to give a justified view on the period. Post War of the Roses Henry VII consolidated…
To what extent where the Acts of union between England and Wales the most significant development in politics and government in the period 1483-1547 Introduction: Acts of union Crown and parliament to crown in parliament (Thomas Cromwell) Empson and Dudley Richard’s III’s shift in control of the North The Acts of Union where very significant in the development of government. It unified Wales, which was seen to be a lawless country, to England and created one stable and powerful unit. The Acts…
