website research on juvenile justice system
On November 17, 1999, a Michigan Circuit Court jury found thirteen-year-old Nathaniel Abraham guilty of second-degree murder.1 Abraham was convicted of killing Ronnie Greene Jr.—a crime he committed when he was only eleven years old.2 Although tried in an adult court, Abraham was sentenced by Judge Eugene Moore to juvenile detention until the age of twenty-one, at which point he automatically will be released.3
Abraham’s case illustrates the current controversy over the most effective way to deal with juvenile offenders.4 The arrest rate for vio[*PG392]lent crime among juveniles has risen 62% between 1988 and 1994.5 Although arrests of juveniles fell 9% between 1995 and 1999, 17% of all arrests in 1999 involved a juvenile.6In addition, the recent crimes committed by juveniles are “altogether more vicious” than those the juvenile court system was originally designed to face.7 The media’s involvement in publicizing many of the violent crimes committed by juveniles has sparked public demand for stricter penalties.8 In response, some politicians have promoted measures to “get tough” on juvenile crime.9 Indeed, United States Representative Bill McCollum went so far as to say that “[i]n America today, no population poses a greater threat to public safety than juvenile criminals.”10 Many state legislatures have therefore enacted laws making it easier to try juveniles as adults.11 For example, in Michigan, jurisdiction over Abraham was transferred from a juvenile court to an adult court under a 1997 statute allowing prosecutors to request that a juvenile be tried as an adult for certain offenses, regardless of his or her age.12 Before that statute was enacted, a juvenile had to be at least fourteen years old to be tried—at the judge’s discretion—as an adult.13
On the other side of the debate over juvenile justice, some feel that juvenile offenders still can be rehabilitated if treated as juveniles [*PG393]rather than as adults and that “getting tough” on juvenile crime does not provide the answer.14 For example, although Abraham was tried in an adult court, Judge Moore believed that Abraham should be sentenced as a juvenile.15 Affirming his faith in the ability of the juvenile justice system to reform delinquents, Judge Moore called the Michigan law authorizing transfer of juveniles to adult court “fundamentally flawed.”16 Similarly, Reverend Al Sharpton and Martin Luther King III argued that it is unjust to sentence children as adults and organized a protest outside the Michigan courthouse where Abraham was being tried.17 Additionally, Amnesty International USA featured Abraham on the cover of its recent report on the juvenile justice system and maintained that trying him as an adult violated “international human rights standards for the protection of children.”18
The current controversy over juvenile justice results in part from the fact that many states have shifted the focus of the juvenile justice system from rehabilitation to punishment and deterrence.19 This Note maintains that in order to help reduce violent juvenile crime, states should continue to expand the focus of the juvenile justice system to include punishment and deterrence in addition to the original goal of rehabilitation. Thus, under certain circumstances, juvenile defendants should be treated more like adults.
Part I of this Note describes the history of the juvenile justice system, including the philosophy behind its formation and its similarities and differences with the adult criminal system.20 Part I also examines the general types of changes that many states have recently implemented to the juvenile justice system.21 Part II explores some alternatives for addressing the juvenile justice controversy.22 Part III advocates a system like that of Massachusetts, where certain juvenile [*PG394]defendants are automatically transferred to adult court, and where other juvenile defendants, who remain in juvenile court
Related Documents: Essay on Crime and Juvenile Court Judge
country acknowledge that a juvenile both male and or female is a person between the ages of 10 and 18. In addition, some states have the authority to establish the maximal juvenile age as 16. Anyone over a state's given age limit is tried as an adult. All Criminal law proceedings set by a juvenile person is termed under the definition of delinquency. And once the Criminal law matters are considered a delinquency the term crime is no longer used. Instead, the Juvenile court system uses the word act…
adult and juvenile court systems. Before the juvenile system was established in 1899 (Juvenile Justice System, 2012). Youths were in courts and placed in facilities with adults. This concept made the government re-evaluate how youths are treated and felt that they were different from adults because of their age, and they should be separated from adults and have their own courts. In this paper, we will take an overview of the juvenile justice system, a point by point comparison between juveniles and adults…
The Juvenile Justice Process: A Breakdown of the System Dana R Kirkland Strayer University Abstract Although based on the adult criminal justice system, the juvenile justice process works differently. Juveniles can end up in court by way of arrest, truancy or for curfew violations or running away. A youth may also be referred to the juvenile court system by school officials or a parent or guardian for being continuously disobedient. The juvenile justice process involves several different steps…
JUVENILE CRIME Juvenile Crime Dominique Griffin CJS/200 March 1, 2015 Doug Westly In this paper, I will be discussing juvenile crime along the edges of the differences between juvenile and adult courts systems, the description of delinquency and status offences and last, but least the variables that correlate with juvenile crimes rates. The differences for juvenile and adult courts vary. In adult court, the state is continually trying to prove that the adult actually committed the misconduct…
FINAL US LEGAL OUTLINES Criminal Justice * Most criminal statutes have sentencing structures. Judges usually have considerable freedom in determining type, length, conditions * Suspended sentence- the sentence is given but does not have to be served at the time imposed; the defendant may have to serve the sentence if rearrested or breaks parole. * Probation- the defendant is released to the supervision of a probation officer, defendant has to meet certain conditions (job, drug free,…
Juvenile Crime Foundations of the Criminal Justice System Week 9 The United States of America has criminal justice system that is created by the people and works for the people. The court systems have some differences in each state. There may even be some variances between local and state laws. However, the system’s objective is to work towards a balance. The functions of the justice system are law enforcement, the courts, and the corrections system. The system is into further…
Juvenile Court Process Marina Pacheco CJA/224 June 04, 2014 Nashmeel Sadjadi Juvenile Court Process Before juvenile courts came into existence, juvenile criminals were treated the same as adult criminals. Prior to the juvenile courts, it was concluded that children between the ages of seven and fourteen, and younger, did not have the capacity to commit crimes with criminal intent, therefore they were eliminated from the criminal justice system. For children over the age of fourteen, they were presumed…
Juvenile Justice Everyone is ultimately responsible for their actions, and when you break a law in the United States you are put through our criminal justice system. For children under the age of 18, they are considered minors and are not held to the same standard of regular adults; there simply not as responsible for their actions. So instead of ringing them through the rough and brutal normal criminal justice system. We have made a softer and gentler system (processes) for minors called Juvenile…
Charlie – A Case in Juvenile Justice Melissa Thomas CJ420 – Juvenile Justice Prof. Amy Ng December 4, 2012 Abstract Children are gifts from above and need guidance and love. If either one is absent then they are at risk of becoming juvenile offenders or career criminals. The juvenile justice system has many players that facilitate the tools for a juvenile to use an offense as a learning experience. The juvenile encounters three important individuals; the juvenile police officer, probation…
Paper on Juvenile Crime Anait Asatryan University of Phoenix December 7, 2014 CJS/200 There are many similarities between juvenile court and adult court, and there are also differences as well. The same process for booking applies for both, but the main differences are their constitutional rights, sentencing options vary, and the terminology used differs in juvenile court than adult court. Adults are given more constitutional rights, than a juvenile in court. Adults have the right to have…