The Juvenile Justice Process: A Breakdown of the System Dana R Kirkland Strayer University
Abstract Although based on the adult criminal justice system, the juvenile justice process works differently. Juveniles can end up in court by way of arrest, truancy or for curfew violations or running away. A youth may also be referred to the juvenile court system by school officials or a parent or guardian for being continuously disobedient. The juvenile justice process involves several different steps including intake, detention, adjudication, disposition and aftercare following release from a juvenile correctional facility. In this paper we will breakdown the numerous steps involved in the juvenile justice process as well as compared some If the juvenile was held in detention pending a formal hearing it at this time a detention hearing will be held. The detention hearing generally happens the day after the petition was filed by the prosecutor. It is here where a judge will decide whether the current detention of the juvenile is justified and whether continued detention is warranted. The judge will decide one of two outcomes; release the juvenile, sometimes under the consideration of home supervision or to detain the juvenile for a rehearing. If the juvenile is indeed detained he/she is subjected to a jurisdictional hearing. The jurisdictional hearing is a where the judge will decide if the allegations in the petition are true. A jury is not used in juvenile court. The judge will read off the allegations and ask the juvenile if the charges are true or false. It is here where the minor can decide to deny the charges or enter a plea. If the judge decides that the petition is true it is at that time a hearing date is set. The next step in the process is a disposition hearing. During the disposition hearing several factors are weighed; whether the judge feels the findings are true to the dismissal of the petition (findings are deem untrue by the judge). If the judge does agree with the petition and its findings after the hearing he will then decide what to do with the juvenile. The judge will either place the juvenile on a 6 month informal probation with the
Related Documents: The Juvenile Justice Process Essays
ESSAY QUESTION 11/20/2014 The Juvenile Justice Process There are millions of criminal offenders out there in this world, all different in personalities, ethnicity, backgrounds, and age. Adults and juveniles have a different justice process when it comes to being processed through the legal system because of a crime. Juvenile courts throughout the United States process more than 1.5 million delinquency cases every year. The juvenile justice process has 3 phases, The intake, adjudication…
Juvenile Justice System: Their Rights/Process The juvenile justice system of today is remarkably different in the scope, purpose, and operation that the early founders of the system ever envisioned. Some elite people call for the abolition of the juvenile justice system. The juvenile court system in the United States has been in existence since 1899. Over the past century, the juvenile justice system has been marked by the concerns in how to treat juveniles. The juvenile justice system is a network…
JUS-331 Juvenile Justice 3.1 Rights vs. Rehabilitation Rehabilitation v. Rights The main purpose of the juvenile justice system is to hold juvenile offenders accountable and responsible for their delinquent actions against society. The purpose of the juvenile justice system is to give juveniles a better understanding of law and to understand that ideally for every delinquent action there is going to a consequence and is determined within the confines of the law. Adults that commit crimes, have…
Charlie – A Case in Juvenile Justice Melissa Thomas CJ420 – Juvenile Justice Prof. Amy Ng December 4, 2012 Abstract Children are gifts from above and need guidance and love. If either one is absent then they are at risk of becoming juvenile offenders or career criminals. The juvenile justice system has many players that facilitate the tools for a juvenile to use an offense as a learning experience. The juvenile encounters three important individuals; the juvenile police officer, probation…
Juvenile Crime Statistics On the data presented by Texas Juvenile Probation Commission (2007), in calendar year 2006, police agencies in Texas suited 140,189 juveniles arrest between the ages of 10 and 16. Of this number, 60,657 were advised and unconfined, handled in justice and municipal courts, or redirected and 79,532 were submitted to juvenile probation departments. In addition to this, rural society and the Texas Youth Commission (TYC) has referred another 24,329 cases, for a total of 103…
defense of the accused. In the United States, jurisdictions have public defender office or the court appoint local attorneys and reimburse accordingly. Adjudication is the reason for are criminal justice system, whether a public or private wrong, the adjudication is the resolution. Most criminal justice systems operate on the premise of innocent until proven guilty and some variations in application though the crime control model. Importance of an independent judiciary elected vs. appointed. Question…
with the Juvenile Waiver Process Corey L. Bulger Capella University Table of contents Abstract p.3 Introduction p.4 Trends and Literature Review p.6 Systems and Theory Evaluation p.11 Conclusion and Recommendations p.14 Reference List p.19 Abstract In the past 25 years juvenile crime has been increasing, which has increased juvenile wavier process throughout…
Adult Justice System vs. Juvenile Justice System Versus CJ150: Juvenile Delinquency Josh Skaggs There are many similarities and differences between the adult and juvenile justice systems. Although juvenile crimes have increased in violence and intensity in the last decade, there is still enough difference between the two legal proceedings, and the behaviors themselves, to keep the systems separated. There is room for changes in each structure. However, we cannot treat/punish juvenile…
website research on juvenile justice system On November 17, 1999, a Michigan Circuit Court jury found thirteen-year-old Nathaniel Abraham guilty of second-degree murder.1 Abraham was convicted of killing Ronnie Greene Jr.—a crime he committed when he was only eleven years old.2 Although tried in an adult court, Abraham was sentenced by Judge Eugene Moore to juvenile detention until the age of twenty-one, at which point he automatically will be released.3 Abraham’s case illustrates the current controversy…