Chapter 17 Is it always just sex?
Describing two humans sharing an intercourse is not easy, as explained in the book most authors go around the situation, or sometimes explain way to deeply, and it becomes awkward. So how should sex be explained? In order for it, not to be to awkward or too reserved?
Most writers when writing about sex, tempt to talk about it, but avoid the act itself, but if you look deeply when there talking about it. Sometimes, sex stands for something else.
Basically when an author is rambling off on something else, its usally sex. But if the author is talking specifically about sex, their usally are talking about something else.
Back in time it was hard to find a poilite literature due to all the censorship both officially and self imposed. Standing for the authorities wouldn’t let you publish anything that wasn’t within content, and people weren’t as liberal to be talking about other stuff that people still didn’t have the courage to talk about.
Joyce was censored, banned and confiscated both in the United States and in the United Kingdom. Due to her sexual refrences, there was a lot of sex.

Example: In john fowles, theres one famous sex scene. Between the two main characters who are Charles and Sarah. The novel is about love and sex, yet theres only one sex scene. So you get where im coming from right? Not everyone can talk about sex liberally without making it seem kind of weird, or awkward for the reader.

In millers novel, sex is