Explain why relations between the USA and the USSR grew worse in the years 1943-49 ?
The USA and the USSR were allies during WW2, but as soon as the war was over their friendship began to collapse. In the years 1943-49 relations grew worse and a cold war developed.
First of all the most important reason as to why relations grew worse was because the USA and the USSR did not trust each other. one reason for this was because of the extreme differences in political systems and the USA had always been suspicious of communism. Therefore this made relations worse because after they finished needing each in WW2 if they did not trust each other they would be unlikely to help the other nation if it did not benefit their own nation.
Therefore as soon war ended tensions began to rise. This can be seen at the Potsdam conference in july 1945, which is 5 months after the end of the war. I know tensions began to rise and the nations started to have disagreement when there were several disagreements at this conference.The second conference was the Potsdam conference in July 1945. In this conference things were different, Truman was now in charge and he saw things differently and didn’t trust Stalin as far as he could throw him! There were a number of disagreements for example the size of the reparations and the fact Truman did not tell Stalin that he had an Atomic Bomb. This fact worried Stalin and it even started a very long arms race.
As a result of Stalin’s fear the USSR tried to form a buffer zone of communists states on their western borders in the years between 1945 and 1948. For example they approached Czechoslovakia, Poland, Hungary, Bulgaria, Yugoslavia, Romania & East Germany! The plan was to try and make them all communist therefore increasing Stalin’s empire! This made relations worse because the USA then feared the spread of communism so they intervened and decide they needed to take action before it was too late and the communist spread was too large.
The USA was alarmed by Stalin’s takeover of Eastern Europe and decided to implement a policy of containment. They did this by implementing the Truman Doctrine and the Marshall plan. Truman thought it was his responsibility to stop the spread of communism; he called it the Truman Doctrine. For example, Greece was one of the countries that hadn’t turned to communism yet, in order to stop the communist rebels over throwing the government, Britain send its army to fight the rebels and protect Greece. But in 1947 when Britain told America they could no longer afford keeping their army there America sent its troops. This is just one example, next Truman offered aid to any country that hadn’t turned to communism that needed aid, a.k.a the Marshall Plan. This included America sending $17 billion dollars in
Short Story Analysis “The Necklace” There are many themes intertwined in the telling of the short story “The Necklace”, by Guy de Maupassant. Two that must be considered particularly revealing are ones of envy and deceit. The main character, Mathilde Loisel, is extremely envious of other women who are wealthy. She believes that she deserves to live with worldly possessions and to be highly respected by others. She feels like she doesn’t belong with her husband, a poor clerk, who was chosen…
The Necklace: A story beyond a moral lesson The author, Maupassant, in his story “The Necklace” conveys a simple moral; one mistake can have years long detriments. Mathilde’s night of pleasure at the party and for carelessly losing the borrowed necklace led to ten years of misery which latter found to be unnecessary and could have been avoided if only Mathilde had been honest with Madame Forestier from whom she borrowed this imitation. It gives a special lesson to people who try to impress by…
The story of “The Necklace” by Guy de Maupassant tells a story of a woman, Madame Loisel, who got overly obsessive with material possessions, which ultimately lead to her downfall. Instead of being content and thankful for the position she was in, she thirsts for better and prettier things in an unhealthy manner. Madame Loisel wants to be in a higher socioeconomic class, and complains about the current status of her life. Through a series of events, she gets to live her fantasies for one night, but…
on a daily basis. Some choose to lead a life filled with good morals and the best chosen decisions, however there are those who choose the antagonist role, and fight against unnecessary outcomes. In The Necklace, Mathilde protects herself by forgoing a lifetime of savings to invest into a necklace she lost in an attempt to enhance her image. Maupassant uses strong literary devices such as irony and symbolism to signify an important truth that we must be content with who we are and what we have as…
Luxury or Affordability: Mme. Loisel’s inner conflict in Maupassant’s The Necklace In Maupassant’s “The Necklace” Mme. Loisel lives a comfortable and affordable middle-class lifestyle, but one that she criticizes and hopes to abandon; she dreams only to live within the silk walls that only a more lavish lifestyle could bring, a lifestyle she knows could never be hers. Mme. Loisel believes that she is made for a luxurious lifestyle and therefore longs the life of an upper-class woman. Mme. Loisel’s…
The Necklace In the story “The Necklace” Mathilde the beautiful wife, is selfish and dissatisfied with her life style. She lives a better than average life with a servant at her beck and call and still complains about her surrounds and the fact that she only has one servant. “She suffered from the poverty of her dwellings, from the wretched look of the walls, from the worn-out chairs, from the ugliness of the curtains.” While a woman in her status would never describe their home with such…
James Underwood 9/12/13 English 101-070 Mr. -------- In the short story, “The Necklace” by Guy de Maupassant, we meet Mathilde, a pretty and charming women who felt she was married into a class below her. While living a comfortable life, she craves more than what she has. She spends most of her time thinking about a lavish and luxurious lifestyle, to the point that it’s everything she wants in life, but nothing she has. The major theme in the story is how deceptive things can seem. When…
she discovered, in a black satin case, a superb diamond necklace; her heart began to beat covetously. Her hands trembled as she lifted it. She fastened it round her neck, upon her high dress, and remained in ecstasy at sight of herself. Then, with hesitation, she asked in anguish: ‘Could you lend me this, just this alone?’ ‘Yes, of course.’” In this quote, Madame Loisel is talking to Madame Forestier about a diamond necklace that she would like to borrow to attend a distinguished…
Bickford English 1102 6 February 2006 Analysis of "The Necklace" Many women dream of living a rich life, full of luxury, riches and servants. In the short story "The Necklace" by Guy de Maupassant, a middle-class woman named Madame Loisel desires that life style very much. In "The Necklace" Madame Loisel's vain desires cause many conflicts and her ultimate downfall. One small conflict in the story is Madame Loisel vs. her husband. He is always trying to make his wife satisfied and she never…
An Exploration of the Theme of Deception in Guy de Maupassant’s The Necklace Steven Major November 15, 2013 Instructor Patrice Glenn ENG 125 Introduction to Literature The Necklace by Guy de Maupassant tells the harrowing tale of Mathilde Loisel and her desire to move up within the ranks of French society. Though provided with her needs, Mathilde also wants the desires of her heart that her husband and his current status in life cannot provide to her. Consistently unsatisfied with her station…