Police Officers taking DNA after traffic stop?
Since the early 1990’s, 28 states have passed laws requiring DNA to be collected if the offense is serious, to where it will be put into a database, where it will “help” match offenders to an unsolved crime. It’s said to be that taking a swab of DNA from someone is “violating” the 4th amendment but some don’t believe that is true.
I do not agree to Officers being allowed to take a swab of my DNA, because they can accuse me of something I may have not done just because some sort of my DNA was found at crime scene.
A few reasons to why this may be bad are because if they found some sort of DNA at a crime scene and it goes back to you, you may be charged. Reason two is that the government and any Official may check a united database and see your DNA for some crime you may have committed. My final reason is that it’s bending the rules towards the 4th amendment (prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures and requires any warrant to be judicially sanctioned and supported by probable cause).
They may accuse me or someone of doing something if my DNA was found at a crime scene, I would be considered a suspect in the crime.
Officers should not be allowed to take DNA on a serious traffic stop because it’s said that officers “abuse their power” when approaching curtain scenes. Letting Officers take DNA and putting them in a national database without a “warrant” is violating the 4th amendment.
That is why I think that Officers should not be able to take DNA samples at a traffic stop.
The officers and court may convict you for something you may not have done years ago, but found your DNA at the crime scene.
Taking and analyzing a cheek swab of the arrested person’s DNA is not like fingerprinting and photographing a
Related Documents: Should Police Officers Be Allowed To Ta Essay
the watchdog or gate keeper over police behavior. Social psychologist Kurt Lewin coined the term gatekeeper, in 1945 to signify those who make decisions concerning the flow of news and information. These gatekeepers collect the news and select information to present to the public (Fielder 32). Some newspaper and TV reporters are careful to maintain independence from the police and are ready and willing to expose corruption, incompetence, or brutality. The police often make sure to distinguish between…
Contents 1.1. Identify the main types of state and independent schools: ----------------------------- P161 1.2. Describe the characteristics of the different types of schools in relation to educational stages and school governance: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ P168 1.3. Describe roles and responsibilities of: --------------------------------------------------------- P174 1.4. Describe the roles of external professionals who may work with a school:…
NATURE AND CAUSES OF GLOBAL MONEY LAUNDERING PRESENTED BY: Kiran Aftab (Roll # 01) Afifa Naseer (Roll # 68) MBA-2004 4th Semester INSTITUTE OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION UNIVERSITY OF THE PUNJAB LAHORE TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 6 History…
ARTICLE REVIEW Chemical aftermath: contamination and cleanup following the Tohoku earthquake and tsunami. Dan LaPrad Emergency Management 20 November 2012 Did Japan do enough to protect the First Responders and clean-up personnel? This article was written after the 9.0 magnitude earthquake that spawned the tsunami that devastated the coastline of Japan. It is critical of the protective measures that were provided to the First Responders and clean-up personnel that responded to…
PRINCIPLES OF CONTRACTUAL LIABILITY LAWS11-212 NOTES DEFINITIONS: Estoppel: Prevents promissors reneging in their promises where it would be unconscionable for them to do so, Waiver: Strict performance, can still be technically demanded, but won’t be insisted on. Privity: Only a party original to contract may sue. Unilateral contract: reward type contracts – obligation one sided Collateral contract: statements that are intended to have some contractual significance but are not included as terms…
Formation of a contract Contracts are agreements that are legally binding. They can be simple contracts or formal contracts. Formal contracts don’t normally involve any consideration whereas simple contracts can be written or oral and unilateral or bilateral. Any contract has a few essential elements: * Intention * Agreement (offer and acceptance) * Consideration. For a contract to be valid it must * Be made with parties that have legal capacity * Be made with genuine consent…