Opinion on effectiveness of Letter to Shareholders of the annual report
Chairman Nooyi’s Letter to Shareholders meets the majority of criteria on the purpose of a letter to shareholders. Overall, the letter provides a strong summary of previous year highlights, future goals, and objectives. Exact core numbers and percent of revenue Pepsi incurred are reported and this allows the audience to make decisions based on the reporting; however, these numbers are non-GAAP. It sets a positive tone and reports on sales and earnings, financial health of the company, achievements to date, continual changes and innovation, plus closing remarks of where Pepsi is headed. Emphasis is placed on positioning for long term growth while addressing impactful issues on changing markets and how the company will remain competitive in challenging environments within many different aspects.
It is detailed in how Pepsi will continue to build the brand both domestically and on a global perspective while touching on productivity, people, operations, and performance. Most importantly it addresses the future plans for this upcoming year and specifically how Pepsi will execute on these plans. The letter is effective in its communication and provides a good summary of visions and strategies with both prospective and current shareholders. The content allows existing shareholders to have a better understanding on all decisions, goals, and operations that Pepsi is currently engaging in both now and later allowing enough insight for the audience to take the information and evaluate Pepsi’s overall performance goals.
A couple details that could have been addressed more clearly are on how the corporation will minimize risk and the actual plan for how it will allocate the increase in marketing dollars. The message lacks a bit of overall strategic vision; however, still provides shareholders a solid groundwork to have a comprehensive understanding of Pepsi so as to make better decisions for the continual growth of the company.
Major Issues of Management’s Discussion and Analysis
The Management’s Discussion and Analysis section lists several major issues that Pepsi must face in the upcoming year and in the future. Issues identified included everything from consumer changes, market changes on a global perspective, and overall business operations from finance, accounting, intelligence, all encompassing. Some of the most crucial issues affecting Pepsi’s success have a lot to do with changes in consumer mindsets, global economics, political changes, and increases in price for commodities due to global fluctuations on many variables that are uncontrollable. Since many of the outstanding and developing issues addressed in this section are indeed uncontrollable variables- this requires Pepsi to adjust business operations accordingly to accommodate these issues that are outside of its natural control.
Change in Consumer Preferences: Demand for Pepsi products as stated may be adversely affected by changes in consumer preferences and tastes. This is an uncontrollable factor as consumer values change as society begins to evolve into a different mindset in regards to food consumption. This includes changes in the perception of sugar and other artificial ingredients or attributes in addition to an increasing negative image of “junk foods”.
International Market Expansion/limitations in political changes: Pepsi has no control over changes in policy or government both domestically and internationally. Civil unrest or other developments and risks in markets where products are sold may heavily affect overall business operations. However, again- this is an uncontrollable variable. Pepsi can only continually engage in international market research and adjust plans accordingly to accommodate such volatility which may prove to be difficult. Since international markets are a large percentage of Pepsi’s business model, failure to successfully implement global
Pepsi Co. is a multinational food and beverage manufacturer producing and distributing snacks, beverage and other consumable products. As some of you might have already known, the first Pepsi bottle was produced at the beginning of the 20th century, but it was not until 1965 that there was a fully incorporated firm distributing the product, or in short, Pepsi Co was officially founded in1965 in Delaware. Its headquarters are now located in Purchase, New York. With over 2500000 employees, an annual…
Caleb Bradham looking for ways to attract people to his pharmacy invented the beverage now known around the world as Pepsi-Cola. After the first advertisement the sales of the new soft drink began to explode. Throughout its existence Pepsi adjusted its marketing strategies trying to keep up with the social and economic conditions of its consumers. The breakthrough move by Pepsi was made in the late 1950s to capture the market of new generation of baby boomers. Our mission is to be the world's…
The consumption of Pepsi and Coke increased 3% per year from 1970 to 2000. The growth was due to many factors but the main reason was the introduction of diet and other flavors. The growing economy and pricing strategies. b. Update the profitability....what has happened to Coke and Pepsi since 2006? Use evidence from their annual reports dated 2012. (10 points) Coke and Pepsi has continued to see growth over all. Coke has increased their market share over Pepsi in the beverage market…
Investment Analysis Investment Analysis In 1965, Pepsi Co was created through a merger of two companies Pepsi Cola and Frito Lay by Donald M. Kendall, President and Chief Executive Officer of Pepsi-Cola and Herman W. Lay, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Frito-Lay. Pepsi was originally founded in 1898 by Caleb Bradham, a New Bern, North Carolina, druggist, who first formulated Pepsi-Cola. Today, Pepsi is part of a portfolio of drinks that includes carbonated and non-carbonated drinks such…
You Are an Investment Analyst Abstract Through this paper Pepsi and Coca Cola will be fully evaluated. A stock market analysis will be presented to a client as part of a professional consultation process. A background of both Pepsi and Coca will be accompanied in order to have a full synopsis of each company. The stock trends will be examined for both investment options. The stock trends will be based from the intial public offering day to January 2, 2012. Current events surrounding both…
and Pepsi are the two greatest competitors in the soft drink industry. A brief introduction and history of the two companies will provide a basis for understanding how the companies have come to be where they are today and how they run their companies. The company structure of each will also be briefly explained to provide an understanding of how management style is impacted. Marketing and Advertising The marketing skills that these companies possess are the reason both Coca-Cola and Pepsi are…
areas: Historical trends and advertising/promotion expenses expressed as a percent of total sales relative to what Pepsi and Coca Cola are doing. First, in regard to historical trends, in 1985, Crush captured 22% of the market share while spending 25.2%, or $4,371,200.00 on advertising expenses, earning total sales revenues of $17,345,680.00. This occurred without the presence of Pepsi and Coca Cola competing in their target market. Due to our repositioning strategy, Crush will once again be targeting…
A Case study On PepsiCo Burma connection Executive summary: The case mentions about how PepsiCo had to withdraw all its assets from Burma despite the fact that they were doing very well in this country. In July 1988, decline in economic conditions led to large-scale and bloody rioting in cities in Burma. In Sept 1988, the army under General U.Saw Maung replaced the Government with the State Law and Order Restoration Council (SLORC), a group of military officers. In 1990, SLORC proposed…
does operations of hundreds of third-party bottlers and distributors. The Competitive Situation: The top three carbonated soft drink corporation in America are Coca-Cola Co. Pepsi Co. and Dr. Pepper Snapple Group in that order. Coca-Cola is leading with market share percentages of 42.4% and following behind them is Pepsi Co. with a market share percentage of 27.7%. The Dr. Pepper Snapple Group has two very tough competitors ahead of them while they are still competing and staying the third most…
Victoria Dominguez Case Two 1. Historical aspects in my opinion were and are the main problem when it comes to MNC’s in India. India’s history of colonization puts them in a position where they have to scrutinize even the smallest inconsistency because their natural resources, their people, and their country can be at risk if something were to go wrong or get out of hand. For example, in 1984 DOW chemical company had a huge chemical spill that contaminated the whole town of Bhopal and is still…