Organisational Analysis 2011 - 2012 Marking Criteria | |
| |(All 3 criteria are equally weighted) |
| |THEORY and LITERATURE KNOWLEDGE AND |ANALYSIS LINKING THEORY & PRACTICE |CRITICAL EVALUATION, COHERENT ARGUMENT |
| |UNDERSTANDING | | |
| | | | |
|MARK | | | |
|100 | | | |
| |Demonstrates an excellent knowledge and |Insightful analysis that highlights and|Excellent evidence of sound judgement, critical thinking and|
|90 |understanding of theories and concepts used.|exposes key issues. |well supported evaluations. |
| | | | |
|80 |Shows excellent evidence of reading widely. |Extensive integration of theory with |Development of strong, coherent argument. |
| | |practice. | |
|70 |Extensive reference to wide range of | |Consistently addresses the purpose of the question. |
| |relevant literature. |Well chosen number and quality of | |
| | |examples. |Adept handling of the material, well reasoned, with a clear |
| | | |line of thought. |
| | | | |
| | | |Coherent structure |
| | | | |
|68 |Demonstrates a good knowledge and |Perceptive analysis that explores |Good evidence of judgement, critical thinking and support |
| |understanding of theories and concepts used.|important issues. |for evaluations. |
|65 | | | |
| |Shows good evidence of reading. |Good integration of theory and |Development of a coherent argument. |
|60 | |practice. | |
| |Reference to a good range of relevant | |Addresses the purpose of the question. |
| |literature. |Good number and