Kim Jong IL
In order for a ruler to be a dictator, one must absolute power to rule over a country. Dictators are rule by force regardless of what others want or need. Kim’s dictatorship of North Korea was characterize by ruling through terror and using gas chamber to torture people, which led him having complete power over the people and government of North Korea. Kim kept the North Korea at the edge of starvation and collapse, banished to gulags citizens deemed disloyal and turned the country into a nuclear weapons state. His harsh punishments of the people through things such as torturing his people makes Kim Jong IL the worst dictator known to mankind. “Kim enforces loyalty and obedience through its ministry of people’s security, which requires citizens to spy on each another, including family members. (Head para.5) Anyone who is overheard saying anything perceived as critical to the government is subject to a reduced loyalty group rating, torture, execution, or imprisonment in one of North Korea’s ten brutal concentration camps.” Kim torture his people to have his own desire. “He is said to be arrogant and self-centered in policy decisions, openly rejecting criticism or opinions that differ from his. He is suspicious of nearly all of those who surround him and volatile in his emotions. (“Kim Jong IL. Biography” para.3) There are many stories of his irregularity, his playboy lifestyle, the lifts in his shoes and pompadour hairstyle that make him appear taller, and his fear of flying. Some stories can be verified while others are most likely exaggerated, possibly circulated by foreign operatives from hostile countries. This is a great example of how Kim had no sympathy for the thing he did. Like a true dictator, his rules were absolute unfair and ignore human right. In 1990s, an overwhelming famine struck North Korea as a result of decades of economic mismanagement, resource misallocation, poor industrial and agricultural productivity, the disappearance of previously productive markets following the Soviet Union's collapse, and the government's massive military investment. “This famine claimed an estimated 2 to 3 million lives (out of a population of perhaps 22 million) and forced the country to rely heavily on international aid to feed its population while Kim continued to funnel all available funds into the maintenance of his million-man army. (“Kim Jong IL. Biography” para. 5)” Some of the visitors who managed to make their way into the country bore witness to the overwhelming and brought back reports of children eating grass to survive. Refugees told stories of cannibalism, with families protecting the bodies of deceased relatives lest they be consumed by starving neighbors.
While his people starved, Kim Jong-Il denied himself some of the pleasures. “His taste for expensive drink ran to a cellar stocked with 10,000 French wines. While North Koreans survived on the equivalent of $900 per year, Kim spent $700,000 annually just on his beloved Hennessy cognac. (“Kim Jong IL. Biography” para.6) Even as North Korea appealed to the UN for food relief, Kim retained a personal sushi chef and enjoyed rare delicacies like shark-fin soup. While traveling on his personal train, he had live lobsters flown in at stops along the way.” Famine and bad nutrition left a permanent effect on the North Korean population. A 2002 UN European Survey found that an average 7-year-old boy in North Korea was 20 centimeters shorter and 22 pounds lighter than his equal size in South Korea. Not even the army, traditionally the best-fed profession outside the ranks of the Communist Party elite, was immune from these effects. As of 2011, North Korean soldiers were told six inches shorter than South Korean soldiers. Regular human-rights abuses throughout North Korea were uncontrol and well documented during Kim's reign. “It is estimated that there were some 200,000 political prisoners in the country as of 2006, and there were innumerable
and what is taught to us. We are taught by our parents, by our teachers, by grandparents, by siblings, friends, ect.. but ultimately a parents wants there child to grow up knowing they taught them to do what was right and wrong. This is where Nature vs. Nurture come into play this is where we learn ones interest and abilities such as creativity, social skills, problem-solving ability, and so forth. Parents are the keys to intellectual development for almost all children in the care and education…
Nature vs Nurture: Do You Choose Your Sexuality, Or Is It Genetic? The nature vs. nurture debate is one of the most enduring in the field of psychology because of the many different topics that can be attained in this single field. Psychologist have thought and asked questions of how far are human behaviors, ideas, and feeling, innate and how far are they all learned? These issues are at the center of the ongoing nature versus nurture controversy. The French philosopher Rene Descartes suggested…
Nature vs. Nurture The dubious history of the heredity environment controversy can be easily traced as far back as the start of the present century with at least some historical evidence placing the roots of this dispute in the time of John Locke. This controversy has continued despite continual reiteration that the critical question is not how much of a trait is due to heredity and how much is due to environment, but rather how environment transact to influence development." ( Wachs ,…
Nature vs. Nurture “we all born mad,some remain so”.(Samuel Beckett) want it or not,we come to this world with a pre-determined identety that we have no power over it.A set of parameters, like our parents, form the blueprint of what we are.from this point,we are somehow consciously aware of the influences we are exposed to.I am going to discuss the superiority of nurture over nature, in the process of what we become.The issues involved, are family,values of the society, and the…
7th Nurture Vs. Nature There has been a large controversy over whether parental teaching effect our way of thinking or if the environment influences and effects our way of thinking. Some people believe that it is strictly parental teachings that effect our way of life, others believe that it is the environment that effects us, and some believe that both of these influence our behavior. Either way, people have been struggling for a long time deciding whether our personalities are nurture or nature…
2014 Researchers have been in dispute for many centuries about whether nature or nurture has a stronger influence on early human development . Nature is inherent traits from birth and Nurture is one's environment (physical, cultural, social, and familial) and how each plays in one's physical and psychological identity (doc 1) . In my opinion, I believe that nurture is a more powerful influence in the human experience. Nurture strongly influences early human development for many reasons. th According…
The debate nature and nurture has been going on for years and is still unresolved due to no one quite knowing which one is true. Nature vs nurture is about what makes us, us. The genetic makeup (nature) and life experiences (nurture). Many theorists think that it is nature, what we have inherited and our genes, makes us the way we are and how we develop. Where other theorists believe it is the way we are brought up and our experiences, that make us the way we are and how we develop. A wide variety…
Nature Vs Nurture I am familiar with “Nature over Nurture” and I’ve seen it firsthand. I have seen it in small children who make toys that they want while ignoring the room full of toys they have. I’ve seen it in adopted children taking after birth parents in their interests, weaknesses and strengths, regardless of the surroundings that they were pre-exposed to. It is the nature that radiates who we are no matter what our environment is. It is the nurture that builds our psyche…
The nature versus nurture debate is about the roles of innate quality or genetic inheritance versus personal experience or environmental factors. This notion is part of the fundamental themes in psychology that is known as heredity and environment (Wayne Weiten & Doug McCann, 2013). Theorists have argued about personal traits and abilities and their connection with nature and nurture. Some theorists believe that personality traits and skills are governed by genetic predisposition. However, environmental…
Keith Mierzejewski Methods of Critical Thinking Research Paper December 11, 2010 Nature vs. Nurture One of the most enduring debates in the field of psychology is the controversial idea of nature vs. nurture. Throughout the endless history of the debate, no clear conclusion has been met, only hypotheses have been formed. At the center of the debate, human behaviors, ideas, and feelings are being determined, whether they are learned or inherited. Determining physical traits, such as eye color…