Using an organisation of your choice, you are required to critically evaluate the Working Capital Management policies in operation
There are many definitions of management accounting with academics such as Jagels et al (2007, p.2) defining it as being “concerned with providing specialised, internal information to managers who are responsible for directing and controlling operations.” Similarly, Adler (2013, p.1) offers a comparable description citing that management accounting aims to “provide information that is relevant and useful to the operational and strategic decisions that senior managers make.” Both of these definitions suggest that management accounting is used for internal purposes unlike financial accounting which focuses on providing information to external parties such as investors. Furthermore, we can also surmise that management accounting places much of its emphasis on planning, forecasting and future decisions rather than the historical financial performance of the organisation.
A key aspect of management accounting is managing working capital with Moyer et al (2008, p.542) stating that “effective working capital policies are crucial to a firm’s long-run growth and survival.” Raheman and Nasr (2007) corroborate this by outlining how it “directly affects the liquidity and profitability” of a company. This essay will seek to define and evaluate the various different features that make up working capital and how they can be successfully managed, with particular reference to the practices of the Clandeboye Lodge Hotel, a four star hotel situated in Bangor, County Down.
Working Capital is identified as the arithmetic difference between current assets and current liabilities (Sagner, 2010) with many authors including Proctor (2009) listing the main current assets as inventory, trade receivables, and cash. Following on from this, the main current liabilities are understood to be trade payables and bank overdrafts as outlined by Siddaiah (2010). It is the balance of these which will determine a firm’s liquidity, or in other words their “ability to pay in cash the obligations that are due” (Vijayakumar, 2001, p.146). Cash is the most liquid of current assets with it being readily available, whilst inventory is typically the least liquid as it generally takes the longest amount of time to convert into cash. There are a number of ratios used to establish how liquid an organisation is, however Baker and Powell (2005, p.48) state that the “most widely used” is the current ratio and it is calculated by dividing the firm’s total current assets by the total current liabilities. There are many arguments over what the ideal current ratio should be, with scholars such as Fabozzi (2001, p.480) disputing that the “general standard for this ratio (such as 2:1) is not useful.” However, many authors including Thukuram (2006, p.87) conclude that a ratio of 2:1 is “considered ideal as a rule of thumb.” Nevertheless, whilst aiming for a 2:1 ratio would suggest an encouraging solvency position, any higher than that is not necessarily considered positive. As Jackson et al (2009) point out, a current ratio that is more than 2:1 can only be considered good if you are a creditor of a company. From the company’s point of view, it may mean that they are holding too much stock or struggling to collect cash from customers. Alternatively, a ratio of less than 2:1 can indicate that the business will have difficulties in meeting their short term financial commitments. This is one area that the Clandeboye Lodge seem to completely ignore when attempting to manage their own working capital. The priority of the business seems to focus on looking ahead to the future, making plans and accurately forecasting, whereas with the use of liquidity ratios, in order to perform a meaningful analysis “one must have at least a few years of historical data” (Vinturella and Erickson, 2013, p.166) to accurately establish possible trends and industry norms.
detecting misstatements at assertion level, directed towards the actual dollar value (TOD and SAP)- More for BS Audit Documentation- record of audit procedures performed and evidence obtained, conclusions reached. Submitted 60 days after auditors report. Why are they important? Planning and performing the work, review audit work, future audits and inspections. Examples: Minutes, engagement letters, audit strategy, analysis of the RMM, description of IC, Phase 1: Making Client Acceptance Management’s…
Two perspectives: Economic Consequence (understand decision impact) & User-Orientation (how to read/analyze stmts) Corporate Governance: encourages mgmt. to report in good faith and act in best interests of shareholders. GAAP: needed for comparability and minimize bias; established by SEC, enforced by stock exchange, bank regulations, AICPA. IASE: International accounting Standards Committee. IFRS: International Financial Reporting Standards. Operating Activities: prod & sale of goods/service; Investing:…
ACC 333 Exam Two Outline Weds – 7 PM FSB 0025 ERM & CSR ERM (Enterprise Risk Management) Cross functional approach taken by organizations to better manage the outcomes that result from uncertainty: negative outcomes (risks), positive outcomes (opportunities) The above issues represent uncertainty regarding their outcomes Risks should be taken (optimized) while others should not be taken (mitigated with risk responses) ERM things that haven’t happened yet; uncertainty then reveals itself Benefits/Goals…
Mandatory Accreditation of Outpatient Surgery Centers Enough? 107 PLASTIC & RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY 189, 189 (2001). 6. Id. 7. Robert del Junco et. al., Report of the Special Committee on Outpatient (Office-based) Surgery, 88 J. MED. LICENSURE & DISCIPLINE 160, 162 (2002). 8. Id. 9. COMMITTEE ON QUALITY ASSURANCE IN OFFICE-BASED SURGERY, A REPORT TO: NEW YORK STATE PUBLIC HEALTH COUNCIL & NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, ix (2000) 250 Widener Law R eview [Vol. 12:249 oversight…
2013 Collin Technologies Case Study Baldrige Performance Excellence Program National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) • United States Department of Commerce July 2013 To obtain Baldrige Program products and services, contact Baldrige Performance Excellence Program Administration Building, Room A600 100 Bureau Drive, Stop 1020 Gaithersburg, MD 20899-1020 Telephone: (301) 975-2036 Fax: (301) 948-3716 E-mail: baldrige@nist.gov Web: http://www.nist.gov/baldrige The Collin Technologies…