Does the defendant have the right, under the best evidence rule to enter the radiologist’s testimony and written report instead of the actual X-ray which was lost or does the Plaintiff have the right to keep the testimony and report barred from evidence?
Background:
The plaintiff applied for a life insurance policy with the defendant life insurance company. The defendant wanted to make sure that the plaintiff was an “acceptable heath risk” due to an underlying heart condition on plaintiff’s medical history. On March 20, the plaintiff went for a physical exam and X-ray. In a written report the radiologist confirmed that the plaintiff did have an enlarged heart. On April 9, the plaintiff died from an unrelated cause of death. On April 9, the defendant had not accepted or rejected the policy application, at the time of death the defendant did reject the application and returned the paid premium. The plaintiff’s wife has filed a cause of action against the insurance company for the insurance proceeds. Defendant is claiming that at the time of the plaintiff’s application he was not an acceptable heath risk based on his enlarged heart therefore he was uninsurable. The defendant during discovery and trial was unable to find the X-ray and defense counsel is wants to introduce the radiologist’s written report and testimony establish that the plaintiff’s heart was enlarged. The plaintiff wants this precluded as evidence based the best evidence rule requires the X-ray to be present.
Applicable Law:
USCS Fed Rules Evid R 1004Rule 1004. Admissibility of Other Evidence of Content -An original is not required and other evidence of the content of writing, recording, or photograph is admissible if:
(a) all the originals are lost or destroyed, and not by the proponent acting in bad faith
Schozer v. William Penn Life Ins. Co., 84 N.Y.2d 639 (N.Y. 1994) Under a long-recognized exception to the best evidence rule, secondary evidence of the contents of an unproduced original may be admitted upon threshold factual findings by the trial court that the proponent of the substitute has sufficiently explained the unavailability of the primary evidence and has not procured its loss or destruction in bad faith. Best evidence rule simply requires the production of an original writing where its contents are in dispute and sought to be proven. Under a long-recognized exception to the best evidence rule, secondary evidence of the contents of an unproduced original may be admitted upon threshold factual findings by the trial court that the proponent of the substitute has sufficiently explained the unavailability of the primary evidence and has not procured its loss or destruction in bad faith. Why Did you repeat this? Loss may be established upon a showing of a diligent search in the location where the document was last known to have been kept, and through the testimony of the person who last had custody of the original.
Cole v. Canno, 168 A.D. 178 (N.Y. App. Div. 1915) Secondary evidence as to the contents of a letter necessary to sustain plaintiff's cause of action for breach of contract is only admissible when such is the best evidence attainable after reasonable efforts to obtain the original are exhausted. he party alleging the loss of a material paper, where such proof is necessary for the purpose of giving secondary evidence of its contents, must show that he has in good faith exhausted, to a reasonable degree, all the sources of information and means of discovery which the nature of the case would naturally suggest, and which were accessible to him. On appeal, the court held that because the courts below improperly concluded that the best evidence rule established an absolute bar to the admission of that secondary evidence, without permitting the insurer to establish any excuse for its nonproduction, a new trial was required.
As in the case of any other lost original, once the absence of an X-ray
Memorandum To: From: Date: 08/31/2012 Re: Laws of Evidence Assignment #2 Statement of Assignment You have asked me to analyze and determine whether the evidence that prosecution would like to introduce at trial can be admitted based on the Federal Rules of Evidence. Pursuant to your request, this memo includes my analysis, reasoning, and conclusions regarding the admissibility of such evidence. Statement of Facts The defendant was prosecuted for the murder of his wife. The victim’s body…
Shoes Casebook Define the process you will use and address the following assessed classroom discussion questions: What procedures will be used to collect accounting evidence? What sampling tools and techniques will be used for the examination? How will you use analytical and inferential tools to evaluate accounting evidence? Submit your assignment to the facilitator. Note. APA formatting is not required for this assignment. Use a title and reference page where appropriate. Consider…
preponderance of the evidence, that defendant parties somehow committed wrongdoing in the dispute being heard by the judge and jury. In attempting to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that a defendant or defendants committed wrongdoing, plaintiffs have two forms of evidence that are permissible in the courts, including direct and circumstantial evidence. Factual evidence is known as direct evidence, which is seemingly prima facie in itself. Circumstantial evidence, however, attempts to…
A) State & Federal Legislature enacts laws termed Statutes. A) System of law derived from centuries of general rules, customs and experiences, derived from the English. Administrative Law: Army/Navy/Air Force/Marines/Coast Guard B) Cities and Counties always have a right to create laws termed Ordinances B) Judicial Decisions- rules based on decisions of actual legal disputes. Based on the concept of precedent: Once a case has been decided at a higher court (Appellate/Supreme), all future analyses…
Evidence Base Policing In summarizing evidence based policing we come to the conclusion that many cases were justified by a scientific research and not by reasoning or proven evidence. Also practicing one’s and not what’s factorial has been the outcome procedure to everyday field training. Some advantages and disadvantages of evidence base policing are as followed: When law enforcement makes a decision, we come to the conclusion that is not based off of experience. Police agencies use the tools…
voL.5 NO. l0 NOV 20il niio$ By Mohan Dholl, Legol Studies Teocher, PLC Croydon, NSW Critrle - Evidence and Defences The State has much power and the citizens of a State must be protected fiom the arbirary abuse of power by the State. The law enforcemenr arm of the State can detain people suspected of criminal actMq', can EVIDENCE ACT I 995 - SECT l4l - Criminat proceedings: standard of proof interrogate, can lay charges and can bring matters before the courts. Given the dispariry…
Abstract The United States and Australian laws of criminal procedure show many common features which originate from their common English origin. These include the presumption of innocence, the neutral role of the trial judge, and the use of the jury trial. However, between the jurisdictions there are also significant different approaches especially in relation to the treatment of illegally obtained evidence, improperly obtained confessions and entrapment. The transparency of the jury is also an important…
ways does Governor Brisbane’s Proclamation of Martial Law provide insights into the nature of conflict between Aborigines and settlers in the frontier areas around Bathurst in 1824? Essay introduction approx. 200 words There has been much controversy and debate over the issue of frontier violence and conflict between colonial settlers and indigenous Australians during early colonisation of Australia. While some historians contend that the evidence of frontier violence and indigenous deaths has been…
contemporary and prevailing laws to advocate the prosperity of the technological advancement. The generic terminology of Contract Law is defined as rules implemented to conduct the terms of the relationship and the content of an agreement between two or more parties in the forms of individuals, enterprises or other associations contemplating the exchange of interests and ownership of goods and services. The offer and acceptance conditions are embodied within the contract law, perhaps certain regulations…
rights set forth in the Fourth Amendment. When applicable, the rule dictates that the evidence illegally obtained must be excluded as evidence under the Fourth Amendment. See Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643. One important corollary to the Exclusionary Rule is the “fruit of the poisonous tree” doctrine. This rule holds that, in addition to the material uncovered during the illegal search being inadmissible, any evidence that is later gathered as an indirect result of the illegal search will also be excluded…