dgement Drawing from Judgement: Drawing Conclusions from Evidence:
Induction – Typically described as a process in which you go beyond the information given – drawing inferences about a pattern, based on a few examples, or making projections about novel cases, based on what you’ve seen so far. Inducted conclusions are never guaranteed to be true. Nonetheless, if inductions are done properly, the conclusions are likely to be true.
Thus, we want to compare a descriptive amount of human induction, telling us how the process ordinarily proceeds, with a normative account, telling us how things ought to go. In this way, we would be able to ask whether our day-to0day judgements are foolish or sensible, and whether our common-sense conclusions are justified or not.
Attribute Substitution: If judgements often depend on remembered evidence, is there anything you can do to help yourself, so that memory problems are less likely to pull you off track?
One option is Attribute Substitution: you can use this strategy when you are trying to evaluate some point but do not have easy access to the target information. You therefore rely on some other aspect of experience that is more accessible and that is a plausible substitute for the information you seek.
Frequencies: Assessments of how various events have happened in the past.
Availability Heuristic: Relying on availability – the ease with which things come to mind – as an index for frequency. Tversky and Kahneman (1973) referred to this substitution – the reliance of availability as a substitute for frequency – as the Availability Heuristic.
Anchoring: In many situations, we do not know the answer to a specific question but we have an idea about what ballpark the idea is in. What we can therefore do is use that idea as an initial “anchor” and then reach our answer by making some suitable adjustment to that anchor. The problem, though, is that we usually adjust too little, and we are more influenced by the initial anchor than we should be.
In addition, anchoring has another consequence: When judgement errors arise for other reasons, anchoring serves to cement them in
Related Documents: Judgement Drawing from Inference Essay
subject investigates a great opportunity to look back at how my ideas were formed and what I truly believe in. It is interesting to look back at the direction I will take as a Teacher, How will my attitudes be reflected as a Teacher? Do I have ‘baggage’ from my early Mathematics and Science experiences, and what are the positives I can bring to my practices when working with children? Cross (1996) states that ‘Children develops though our thinking… and these skills…enables them to interact with their total…
List of fallacies From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search For specific popular misconceptions, see List of common misconceptions. A fallacy is incorrect argument in logic and rhetoric resulting in a lack of validity, or more generally, a lack of soundness. Fallacies are either formal fallacies or informal fallacies. Contents 1 Formal fallacies 1.1 Propositional fallacies 1.2 Quantification fallacies 1.3 Formal syllogistic fallacies…
regards to numerical calculations. You may do an experiment where you change length and measure time. From this data you collect you may apply some mathematical formula to come to some conclusion. As you have performed calculations on this data, you have quantitatively analysing the data. Data is just data. On its own it is useless. You must analyse this data in order for the information gathered from this data to be useful. c) identify the orders of magnitude that will be appropriate and the uncertainty…
imperative to my current and future career plans. I have also included my current CV and Job Description within this section. Section 3 As part of a self-appraisal exercise, I have undertaken both a Learning Styles audit and a Personality Type assessment. From this I have been able to glean an insight into how I currently learn and how my personality type influences this, both on a learning and managerial level. This section includes introductions to each methodology used, the analysis/ results and a reflective…
case of Iran Fariba Latifi Downloaded by [UQ Library] at 04:16 19 March 2013 Abstract Among many published cross-cultural studies, Hofstede’s work in creating a five-dimension value system and drawing a world cultural map is one of the most comprehensive and cited researches. The results emerging from Hofstede’s study can be used properly only when one considers its strengths and limitations. Reviewing Hofstede’s study, this paper describes the problems associated with using the study’s results…