guideline to evaluate (EC, 2001). Both process has been criticized for the inadequacies to address all the issues (Põder and Lukki, 2011) and variability of scrutiny by reviewers depending on their personal skills and competencies (Peterson, 2010). 2. Role of ES Review within EIA Process Evaluate the approach and findings of the study, in relation to the actual effects of the development, the accuracy of the prediction made and the effectiveness of mitigation measures proposed (Harrop and…
Words 2469 - Pages 10