Following this interpretation the common law may, as shown by the cases of Stone and Dobinsoni, Gibbins and Proctorii, and Instaniii, imply a duty of care in situations where the defendant has voluntarily assumed responsibility for another’s welfare. By contrast, in Sinclair, Johnson and Smithiv the defendant’s conviction for manslaughter was quashed because he had merely done “a desultory attempt to be of assistancev”. In our case scenario Dot is under a duty of care, having voluntarily undertaken…
Words 2189 - Pages 9