Amanda Longo
March 15, 2012
English Comp 2
Mitchell
Why askville.com is an Un-reliable Source When writing papers for college or any type of schooling it is very difficult to find sources that are proper to use. Most professors do not want a lot of internet use because a lot of things that come out of the internet are un-reliable. When something is un-reliable there are a number of things that can make it this way. A lot of websites now are based on opinions or they can be edited by anyone viewing that page. Askville.com is a very un-reliable source because it is based on opinion, the questions are answered by more than one person, and this website is set up in a blog manner. When someone wants to know anything about anything they can type their question into askville.com and within a few hours or a couple days their question may be answered. Some people may find this great but the only problem is that it is usually that person’s opinion. The people who answered the question, “are Catholic schools better then Public Schools” were just normal people with an opinion. The answers to this question have a lot of hasty generalizations such as “all Catholic schools are selective and students must apply before enrolling” (askville). “A hasty generalization is drawing a conclusion on the basis of insufficient evidence” (Winchell). So, just because a few Catholic schools require students to apply and be accepted does not mean that they all require this. The person who answered this question did not send her children to Catholic school so she does not see why it is a good idea. She just sees the rules with applying and the cost and is against it. On the other hand, another person that answered did send her children to Catholic school and she sees all the rules and requirements as good things. So when someone is trying to look up facts this would not be a good source to use because there are too many things going back and forth on the question. This question or any question on this site can be answered by more than one person. This is not good because the answers may contain ad hominem. “This means the attack on the person rather than the argument or the issue” (Winchell). Now, when someone writes a question that they need an answer to they may get many different answers. This can be good but the problem with this is that if one person does not like the answer the person before them put they might not really answer the question they may just argue with that person’s answer and this is called ad hominem. Getting answers from a lot of different people may be okay too because some answers may be actual facts that people looked up before answering. But if they are actual facts then the person will state where he or she got the information from. So if it is not cited then it probably is not a fact. A blog is a place where people can write however they are feeling on a certain day or about a certain topic. That is sort of how this website is set up and a blog is not a reliable source because the only real facts are the
Related Documents: Hasty Generalization and Question Essay
school, I realized how often people rely on fallacious arguments to prove their points. The fallacy that I have encountered the most and that I am guilty of using the most is the hasty generalization fallacy and the fallacy that I understand the least is the “begging the question” fallacy. I feel that the hasty generalization fallacy is easiest to accidentally use because if something seems true for most cases, or for all the cases that we know of, we naturally want to assume that it is true ALL the…
A feather is light. Light is not dark and so a feather is not dark. Red Herring: Distracts the arguer by introducing a new topic. Sweeping generalizations: Applying a general rule to a statement where some parts do not apply. Ex: Children should be seen and not heard. Since little Wolfgang Amadeus is a child, he shouldn’t be heard. Hasty generalizations: Drawing a rule from a single case. Ex: My atheist neighbor is a grouch so all atheists are grouches. False Dilemma: When someone is asked to…
from a bias against others. Race, nationality, gender and sexual orientation are all factors for stereotyping. Stereotypes are basically fallacies would fall under the category of Hasty Generalizations. “The fallacy of hasty generalization is committed when the conclusion is based on insufficient information; a generalization is made too quickly” (Mosser, 2001). Everyone has been stereotyped and is guilty of stereotyping others it is a part of our everyday lives. A common stereotype that I have encountered…
December 2014 Never mind the college fund In the article by Jonnelle Marte of “Never mind the college fund”, she explains why David Fagan does not believe his eight kids should be attending college for higher education by using arguments such as: hasty generalization, straw man, and false dilemma. According to David Fagan, his kids should pay their way to higher education or must obtain a school scholarship if wanting to attend college. He rather expects his kids to learn the value of starting a business…
deductive reasoning A form of thinking that begins with a generally accepted truth, connects an issue with that truth, and draws a conclusion based on the connection. hasty generalization An error in reasoning from specific instances, in which a speaker jumps to a general conclusion on the basis of insufficient evidence. begging the question Assuming that an argument has been proved without actually presenting the evidence. false cause An error in causal reasoning in which a speaker mistakenly assumes…
should appeal to the reader's emotions, and we will soon learn that psychological appeals are a type of support for value claims. Emotionalism is the use of emotion instead of logic. Emotionally loaded terms are terms that are designed to 'beg the question' by implying a verdict without logical argument. Examples: For example, if a cable news channel decides that people who put explosives on themselves and blow up near enemies should no longer be called “suicide bombers” but “homicide bombers,”…
Study guide questions 1) In my opinion children should learn values in elementary school. I think this because a child spends most of his or her time at school and they are put in situations around others that they will need to learn and practice things like sharing and honesty. Although the teacher would be teaching instead of the parent, the values they would be learning would be beneficial to the child and if the parents don’t like these values then they can teach their child when they get…
effect – assuming one event caused another without proving it Either/or reasoning – assuming only two possibilities for a given situation exist Hasty generalization – drawing conclusion from too little evidence or unrepresentative evidence False analogy – assuming that two things that are similar in one way are similar in other ways Begging the question – assuming as a proven fact the very thesis being argued Non sequitur – concluding with a point that does not logically follow from a premise Oversimplification…
fallacy occurs when a writer builds an argument upon the assumption that there are only two choices or possible outcomes when actually there are several. Outcomes are seldom so simple. This fallacy most frequently appears in connection to sweeping generalizations: “Either we must ban X or the American way of life will collapse.” "We go to war with Canada, or else Canada will eventually grow in population and overwhelm the United States." We can either stop using cars or destroy the earth. Slippery slope…