Imagine being a prisoner getting beaten for walking to slow, not having food, water, or maybe even clothing. If it wasn’t for the Geneva Conventions, it would still be like this today. These conventions have changed the world. I will tell you about what they are, and the how the conventions play in the world today.
The Geneva Conventions are 4 treaties and 2 additional protocols protecting civilians and wounded soldiers of the war. The first treaty was signed in 1864. What exactly are the conventions? They are “rules” of the war pretty much. It’s a humane treatment of civilians, prisoners, and wounded people during the war. It all started when Henry Dunant visited the wounded soldiers, he was shocked at the disturbing facilities. As a result, he published a book, Memoir of the Solferino, in honor of the war. This however led to the establishment of the Red Cross in Geneva, then later led to the Geneva Conventions. The Red Cross with a white background like we see today is the symbol of the Geneva Conventions.
The First convention dealt with the treatment of wounded and sick armed forces in the field. With this convention, prisoners were to receive food, medical care, and payment for any work they do. They also now had the ability to send and receive mail to communicate with loved ones back home. The second convention dealt with the sick, wounded, and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea. And the third one death with the treatment of prisoners of war during times of conflict. Lastly, the fourth convention death with the treatment of civilians and their protection during wartime. These conventions were considered war crimes and are punished under international law. Even though people were punished for breaking the conventions, they
Geneva Convention Introduction Swiss citizen Mr Henry Dunant called for an international agreement to be established after he witnessed atrocities such as the murder of wounded and looting of bodies at the Battle of Solferino. His proposal was for the protection of those who are wounded or dying and the establishment of a permanent relieve agency to provide humanitarian aid. This is how the Geneva convention and the Red Cross was established and the treaty was signed in 1864 by 12 countries.…
labor in. POWs in America were well protected, often paid for their services, given food and shelter and generally sent home after the end of the war. The difference is shockingly obvious, but the root of the diverse treatment stems from a single convention, which one country signed and the other refused. Yet America is not all sunshine and lollipops, and by digging deeper, it is possible to see the slight shadow of gulag treatment in the way that some prisoners today are dealt with in the exclusive…
Prisoners of War (POW’s) had been treated horribly with abuse and torture, while in other places were treated with respect of the Geneva Convention but were still starved. POW’s had been treated based on the countries such as being in Germany, Japan or Italy. For instance, the Germans were cruel people; they still respected the Geneva Convention so the prisoners were not treated horribly. They were given the basic essentials for life, but even then they were given small food portions, over worked…
The concept of parties settling their dispute in a binding manner by reference to a person or persons of their choice or private tribunals was well know .to ancient and medieval India. Appeals were also often provided against the decisions of such persons or tribunals to the courts of judge. appointed by the king and ultimately to the king himself. However, the law or arbitration as is known to modern India owes its elaboration, in phases, to the British rule of India. There were series of Regulations…
adapt the Geneva Conventions to terrorists but also have hybridized the GPW and GC in the treatment of some detainees. The traditional combatant would fall under GPW’s POW protection and privileges, while a non-combatant would fall under GC protections for civilians. Civilians, “unprivileged”, or “unlawful combatants” do not receive POW status and may be punished for acts of violence that legitimate combatants could not be punished. Today the lines are blurred with some believing the Geneva Conventions…
II powers, rendering Congress’ actions moot while he overstepped the law. As a result of the unclear wording of Article 1033 of the National Defense Authorization Act, in addition to the Authorization for Use of Military Force and the Third Geneva Convention, President Obama acted within his presidential powers when he authorized the prisoner exchange. After a vote of 269 to 163, the House of Representatives condemned President Obama for failing to give 30 days notice to Congress about the exchange…
States with opposite or adjacent coasts may be effect unilaterally by one of those States, hence maritime delimitation is international by nature’. Question is of course whether England did this in 1999 or not. Article 83 (1) of the United Nation Convention of Law of the Sea (hereafter LOSC) states that delimitation as explained above will be effected by agreement of the basis of international law, as referred…
and maintained the standard of the Geneva Convention. The treatment of prisoners in the Korean War was supposed to be maintained by a standard known as The Geneva Convention on the Prisoners of War in 1929. The article was signed and passed on July 27, 1929 to essentially have a guide and rule-based system for the quality of life for prisoners who may be captured in conflict. Then, many years later The Geneva Convention was surpassed and the Third Geneva Convention was created in 1949, right before…
The term 'world order' referes to the way in which global events and cirumstances are influencded by the major actors in the world. Untill 1990s, commentators on world affairs called their discipline 'International relations'. Since the advent of globalisation the term 'international relations - relations between nations - is no longer broad enough to describe the world. The term 'new world orde'r originated in the early 1900s in the wake of the optimism at the end of the cold war. The need for…
CURRENT DEVELOPMENTS PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW Edited by Dominic McGoldrick and Sarah Williams SELLING THE PASS: HABEAS CORPUS, DIPLOMATIC RELATIONS AND THE PROTECTION OF LIBERTY AND SECURITY OF PERSONS DETAINED ABROAD Abstract On 31 October 2012 the Supreme Court of England and Wales handed down its judgment in Rahmatullah v Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs and Secretary of State for Defence [2012] UKSC 48. The case concerns an application for habeas corpus brought by a citizen of Pakistan originally…