Being a company with over 100 years of history, Ford’s supply chain is very complex, both upstream and downstream. Facing with the increasing competition from Asian automakers, Ford is in a critical position to find better solutions to bridge its existing legacy supply chain to a more responsive and efficient supply chain model.
The facts that Ford should be considering when redesigning the supply chain are: Ford is selling automobiles which are very complex consumer products; Ford’s operation involves many raw materials, thus raw material vendors; Ford has to deal with individual customers who’s purchasing habit is much harder to predict therefore has limit contribution to manufacturing forecasts; last but not least, due to product category that automobile belongs to, it requires physical distribution channels versus virtual stores.
After analysis and consideration, it came to conclusion that fully implementation of virtual integration wouldn’t be practical for Ford; however Dell’s “using technology to enable coordination across company boundaries to achieve new levels of efficiency and productivity, as well as extraordinary returns to investors”, will definitely help Ford’s to identify current bottlenecks and streamline process.
Through the recommended continuous vendor relationship management, better information flow and coordination, leaner manufacturing initiatives, Ford should expect to see improved quality, higher customer satisfaction, better plant productivity, stability and lower dealer and company costs.
Issue Identification
Ford Motor Company was the second largest industrial corporation in the world. It operates business in 200 countries worldwide with about 370,000 employees and total more than $144 billion revenues. The company’s core business had remained the design and manufacture of automobiles for sale on the consumer market. To cope with the growing competition presented by Japanese car makers in last two decades, Ford took actions to continuously improve quality and reduce cycle times while dramatically lowering the costs of developing and building cars by industrial consolidation with other automobile markers, including Chrysler and Daimler-Benz.
The merging enabled Ford to take advantage of its size and global presence, however, it also brought more complexities to Ford’s product mix, more challenges in managing the further expanded supplier base and dealership networks. There are two different perspectives emerging within the company recently concerning how Ford should shape its existing supply chain to better support future business success. Whether or not Ford should adopt virtual integration- Dell Computer’s proven new and cost effective supply chain model supported by enhanced IT technologies, has become the fundamental issue.
In order to better identify whether or not it’s wise for Ford to persuade Dell’s supply chain model, it is necessary to compare and analysis in the context of both Ford and Dell’s unique business nature.
Environmental and Root cause analysis
Virtual Integration, like Michael Dell (founder of Dell Computer) interpreted, is a strategy that Dell uses to blur the traditional boundaries in the value chain among suppliers, manufacturers, and end users. Technology and information are key enablers in such new model.
1. Suppliers:
Ford used to have several thousand suppliers of production material in complex network of business relationships due to the history reason. Suppliers were picked primarily based on cost, and little regard was given to overall supply chain costs, including the complexity of dealing with such a large network of suppliers. Starting from early 1990s, Ford had begun to add more tiers to its supplier base to decrease the number of suppliers the company dealt with directly in order to improve communication efficiency and better relationship management. However, the IT capabilities, maturity
2014 Principles of Finance Final Project General Motors Company vs Ford Motor Company Lauren Grippo GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION (COMPANY) General Motors Corporation (General Motors or GM) was incorporated on August 11, 2009. Also known as GM, the company designs, builds and sells cars, trucks and automobiles parts globally and headquartered in Detroit, Michigan. The company also provides automotive financing services through General Motors Financial Company, Inc. (GM Financial). The company…
Dilemma in the Ford Pinto Case On August 10, 1978 three young girls died in a 1973 Ford Pinto after being stuck from the rear by a driver in a van. The Ford Pinto was completely engulfed in flames and the accident resulted in the death of the three young girls. Today, the debate continues regarding whether or not The Ford Motor Company was responsible for this case and many other cases involving the Pinto bursting into flames resulting in disfigurement or death. Ford has argued for…
Abstract The Ford Pinto case occurred in the 1970s. Famous automobile company Ford designed a new model, and named “Pinto”. Due to its stylish appearance and reasonable price, the Ford Pinto quickly became a popular model. However, the public has raised a lot of questions about the safety of the car. One of the fatal question is that the car’s gas tank has design flaws. And there is evidence that in case of Pinto suffer a rear-end collision, the gas tank is easily punctured by bolts on the differential…
Ford Motor Company: Supply Chain Strategy Ford Motor Company is an American multinational automaker with its headquarters in Dearborn, Michigan. It was founded by Henry Ford and incorporated on June 16, 1903. The case deals with the hurdles, implications and the extent of virtual integration in one of the world’s largest automobile manufacturing company. ‘Ford Motor Company: Supply Chain Strategy’ case focuses on the viability of implementing a supply chain strategy following Dell’s model.…
The Recall Of Both Ford And General Motors And the Ethical Implications. Leander Andreas Zapheriou Lindsey Wilson College Business Ethics 4/25/14 Author Note Leander Andreas Zapheriou, Student Athlete, Lindsey Wilson College. Leander Andreas Zapheriou is currently studying Business Administration concentrated in Management. Abstract This paper discusses the events leading up to the recall of both the Ford and General Motors. Both these vehicle companies dispatched faulty vehicles…
FORD CASE STUDY 1. Using competing values, assess why Ford is widely considered more effective than GM. How could GM have used the competing-values approach in the early 1980s to recognize that it had problems? • In case of Ford motors they were earlier implementing the Rational Goal Model that lays immense emphasis of higher level of productivity, efficiency and profit. The decision-making is centralized to the higher-level authority with very less or no participation from the lower level…
Product Development as a System: A case study of body and stamping development at Ford. Engineering Management Journal, 23(1), 16-28. Retrieved from EBSCOhost. The authors in this journal present the case study of body and stamping development at Ford. A System view of a lean product development is presented in integrated people, process, and tools. The approach of this system is derived from Toyota’s product development system. The success of the Ford Motor Company is based on this system, principles…
Case Study Report- Ford Motor Introduction Ford Motor Company (Ford) is an American multinational corporation which produces cars and trucks. The automaker was founded by Henry Ford and incorporated on June 16, 1903. Ford is the second largest automaker in the U.S. and the fifth-largest in the world based on annual vehicle sales in 2010. Ford introduced methods for large-scale manufacturing of cars and large-scale management of an industrial workforce, using elaborately engineered manufacturing…
Ford Pinto Case: The Invisible Corporate Human Pricetag In this essay, I will argue that Ford Motor Company’s business behavior was unethical as demonstrated in the Ford Pinto Case. Ford did not reveal all the facts to consumers about a harmful gas tank design in the Ford Pinto. They tried to justify their decision to sell an unsafe car by using a Cost-Benefit Analysis which determined it was cheaper to sell the cars without changing to a safer gas tank. The price of not fixing the gas tanks…
Alen Badal The Union Institute F www.ford.com Ford recently received $5.9 billion in Energy Department loans to help retool its plants.m Illinois, Kentucky, Michigan, Nlissouri. and Ohio to produce 13 fuel-efficient models, including 5,000 to 10,000 eiectric cars per year starting in2011. In mid-2009, Nissan Motor was granted $1.6 billion in loans also from the U.S. Department of Energy to build as many as 100,000 electric cars a year at its plant in Smyrna, Tennessee, by 2013. Ford's…