Compare and Contrast New England / Southern Colonies
1. Once established, the Thirteen British Colonies could be divided into three geographic areas: New England Middle Colonies Southern Colonies
2. Though there were many similarities in their development, they were very different: politically, socially, and economically.
3. Similarities: they were all democratic (self ruled), but they ran their democratic government in different ways.
The Middle Colonies had their government and church separate from each other.
The New England Colonies were a Theocracy, which meant that the church controlled the government.
The Southern Colonies had the least autonomy since they were an Oligarchy. This meant that the wealthy plantation owners controlled the government because they were the only people who could manage to pay for all their own expenses.
4. New England and Southern Colonies differences due to climate/geography.
New England: Climate/Geography: s *Bitterly Cold Winters / Mild Summers *Flat land close to coastline
*Hilly and Mountainous Inland *Rocky Soil (Difficult Farming)
Economy: Dependent on ocean. Codfish fishing most important; whaling, trapping, shipbuilding, and logging were also important.
Religion: Life in England was dominated by Church. The Puritans wanted to purify Christianity; they held very strict beliefs. Women were equal in the eyes of God, but less than men so they were not allowed to vote.
Practice explaining in written form the
The Effects of Verb Usage on Schema and Memory Interpretation Vincent T. Phan 006574-0020 Columbine High School IB Psychology SL December 15th, 2014 WORD COUNT: 1442 Abstract Our aim was to replicate the study done by Loftus and Palmer in 1947 on a smaller scale. This involves using two independent variables compared to their five. This is to determine whether the use of language effects the reconstruction of memories via the stimulation of certain schemas. We will do this by convenience…
July 14, 2008, 10:26 am P.R. Pitch of the Month (or Maybe the Decade) By Joe Nocera Like most journalists, I have an in-box inundated with p.r. pitches, most of which go directly to the recycle bin, where they belong. But every once in a while, I get one that is so brazen, so craven, so mind-bogglingly inane that I feel compelled to share it with others. Now that I am blogging, I can share them with you! (Flacks of America: don’t say you weren’t warned.) Check out, especially, the second to…
online users. While users might be willing to pay for low-cost specialized online products such as music and movies, they are not keen on accepting subscription charges to read online news, to sign in Facebook, etc. In fact, studies have shown that only a small fraction of users—almost three percent—are willing to pay to read online news [1, 3]. Users are also not willing to set up and frequently recharge accounts for each online commodity service that they use. These issues make many commodity…