Euthanasia and doctor assisted suicides is an issue that I have by no means had any personal experience with. My research on the question was appealing and enlightening, but did not change my initial feeling on the topic. Throughout this paper I will talk about my belief that euthanasia active and passive, which I consider is necessary when the euthanasia is voluntary and more parties should be concerned with involuntary euthanasia. My belief becomes more difficult as it pertains to particular groups, such as the disabled, infants, the elderly, minorities, the poor, or women. The paper will close by addressing the state laws regarding euthanasia and physician assisted suicide in Missouri, the state in which I consider my home.
Euthanasia is a practice that has been performed and debated throughout time. Death not only involves the person, but also loved ones, health staff, and lawyers. All the parties concerned play a role when a decision needs to be made concerning life or death. I feel euthanasia both active and passive is acceptable when the patient openly consents to the practice, well-known as voluntary euthanasia. Active euthanasia, which “is commonly understood to the intentional commission of an act, such as giving a patient a lethal drug that results in death”, while passive euthanasia “occurs when lifesaving treatment (such as respirator) is withdrawn or withheld, allowing the terminally ill patient to die a natural death” (Pozgar, G. D., & Santucci, N. 2010, p.93, 94). I strongly think anyone should have the right to choose how and when they pass away and ought to be allowed to ease awful or terminal illnesses or diseases.
When the euthanasia is involuntary I think the practice requires extra concentration from the law. Seeing as the patient cannot be honestly involved to accepting, the choice should be made by medical staff, loved ones, and/or law officials. I believe every case should be looked at from different individuals whom are not linked to the case to make sure the patient’s best wellbeing is being practical. With involuntary euthanasia it seems several more ethical and lawful issues come in to play. There needs to be a third party involved to make sure the medical staff or the loved ones are making this decision for the patient and not for a profit to themselves or other planned reason. Also to protect those considered special groups, such as the disabled, infants, the elderly, minorities, the poor, or women.
Special groups of people are more of a fair matter to me because these individuals might not be mentally able or convinced to make a decision. “The ProCon.org Website addresses the debate of legalizing physician-assisted suicide endangering people with disabilities, the elderly, the poor, minorities, and women” (ProCon.org, 2011). I believe these people have some possibility of becoming endangered, but in the end I feel they can be protected by laws pertaining to more care being used with these special groups. I think one can look at the data of such a state as Oregon, where the practice is lawful and see how these special groups are protected. For instance the ProCon.org Website quotes Susan Okie, MD, Contributing Editor of the New England Journal of medicine wrote referring to the justification of physician-assisted suicide “There is no evidence that it has been used to coerce elderly, poor, or depressed patients to end their lives…” furthermore the Website states “Only 2 of the 208 patients who died by means of lethal medication were uninsured” (ProCon.org, 2011, Para 8). The health care facilities ought to have different staff to glance over each case to be certain the practice is fair and serves the greatest concern of the patient. Several states
Related Documents: Essay on Euthanasia Assisted Suicide Debate
"Physician-Assisted Suicide." Congressional Digest 77.11 (1998): 257. MAS Ultra - School Edition. Web. This article examined how the advancement in medical technology has had an impact on patient’s decisions related to health. It really focused in on issues such as the legality of physician-assisted suicide. As well as the legality, how physician-assisted suicide is carried out is dependent on Supreme Court decision to prohibit assisted suicide. Certain circumstances in which assisted suicide is considered…
Euthanasia: Should People Have the Right to Die Gabriella Esposito Professor Luzky Sociology 181-06 November 18, 2012 According to the Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary, euthanasia is defined as “the act or practice of killing or permitting the death of hopelessly sick or injured individuals in a relatively painless ways for reasons of mercy…by taking less then complete medical measures to prolong life.” Euthanasia is legal in very few places around the world. In the United States, Oregon…
Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia : Ethical and Legal Conflict within the United Kingdom It was April 15th in 1989, when Anthony Bland was on his way to watch the FA Cup semi-final at one of England's most famous football clubs in Hillsborough. What Bland, and other football fans throughout England thought would be a memorable football game, between some of England's most acclaimed teams, turned out to be a monumental disaster. The focus of this sporting event was not on the playing field, but instead…
Euthanasia Euthanasia (also called mercy killing) is the act of putting to death painlessly or allowing to die, as by withholding extreme medical measures, a person or animal suffering from an incurable, especially a painful, disease or condition. (“Euthanasia”) To this day euthanasia remains a widely debated ethical problem. As any ethical topic, euthanasia brings up highly controversial questions about life and death, and if we as humans have the right to decide who lives and who dies, or…
Euthanasia: Is There a Duty to Die? Before the coming of Christianity, attitudes toward active euthanasia and suicide had tended to be tolerant. As Christianity continued to spread, religion became a major factor in influencing the actions and beliefs of many people; the idea of hastening a human’s death through euthanasia or assisted suicide no longer seemed humane. In the late 1900s, organized action in favor of the legislation of euthanasia and assisted suicide were taken back into consideration…
Doctor Assisted Death The current debate on doctor-assisted suicide has been ongoing for decades focusing mainly on legal issues, religion and morality. Should doctors have the legal right to euthanize a human being? Does this conflict with the Hippocratic Oath they vowed to abide by as a medical doctor? Or does leaving a patient to suffer a slow and painful death give them to right to bend the rules in order to help their patient. Ongoing debates have been held in order to find a common ground…
Voluntary Euthanasia The Case For Elizabeth S. Davis National American University Abstract The purpose of this paper is to define euthanasia as well as give a brief history of the debate throughout the years. Then the author will show the reader that there is no reason as to why euthanasia has not been legalized. This paper will walk you through many aspects and issues of the debate and try to disprove those who wish to see the debate buried. Euthanasia is the act…
Assisted Suicide: Should it be legal? During a visit to see your mother, she suddenly falls to the ground with no warning. 911 is called, and she is rushed to the hospital with the outcome looking very bleak. After tests are performed, it is discovered that your mother has a tumor the size of a golf ball in her brain which has progressed so that removing it would be no help. Chemotherapy will add approximately a year to her life, but the treatment is so expensive, and the side effects are so bad…
in the hands of somebody else? The Right to Die Movement addresses this idea through the belief that individuals should ultimately control the time and circumstances of their own death. The movement fights for the opportunity of both assisted suicide, and euthanasia – two different forms of death, built upon the same concept. The Right to Die Movement is fairly new, and relies on the support of many different parties of individuals, the most influential ones being medical professionals. The influence…
Is Choosing PAS (Physician Assisted Suicide) an Easy Decision? Kimberly L. Klebine University of Saint Frances Abstract Physician Assisted Suicide has arguably been one of the most controversial subjects in the legal and medical system. Rapid and dramatic developments in medical technology have given the ability to save even more lives than ever possible. Medicine has put at the disposal the means to cure or to reduce…