The current debate on doctor-assisted suicide has been ongoing for decades focusing mainly on legal issues, religion and morality. Should doctors have the legal right to euthanize a human being? Does this conflict with the Hippocratic Oath they vowed to abide by as a medical doctor? Or does leaving a patient to suffer a slow and painful death give them to right to bend the rules in order to help their patient. Ongoing debates have been held in order to find a common ground on this controversial subject, but little has been resolved. The right an individual has to choose his or her own fate clashes with the morality concept set by society that has resulted in this prolonged issue with no clear alternative.
Of all the arguments against the legalization of assisted death, concerns about possible societal consequences are often the most compelling. Skeptics believe that if assisted suicide and/or active euthanasia become legalized, the practice will expand from patients with life-threatening illnesses who are capable of making free and informed decisions to vulnerable groups of patients who do not freely choose or who are incapable of choosing or refusing aid in dying. For example, there may be patients who will feel forced into requesting assisted death by families or communities who cannot or do not want to care for them. Not being able to afford healthcare, particularly palliative care, may also persuade people to seek "a way out" through assisted death. There is also a concern that some patients, such as those with dementia or other mental disability, will be "chosen" as recipients of assisted death by families and physicians who view the patients' quality of life as poor. These examples reflect the "slippery slope" in which abuse occurs, thereby causing more harm than good. Opponents also fear that legalization of assisted death will hinder progress toward providing comprehensive proper care. They argue that assisted suicide and euthanasia will be substituted for optimal health care rather than being reserved as an option after all measures to relieve psycho spiritual and physical distress have failed
Diving deeper into this social controversy will allow us to grasp the true concept and views of the people who are faced with these life and death dilemmas. By getting a better understanding of the reason people contemplate doctor assisted suicide will hopefully help unravel the answers to this complicated topic. Religion, legal aspects, and human morality all influence the side people take on this seesaw topic. Pushing all else aside the central question concerning this topic all connects to the Hippocratic oath taken by doctors. Physicians are obligated to relieve pain and suffering to promote the dignity of dying patients in their care. So when a patient request to be euthanized it is the doctors obligation to respect their patients decision and forgo with the procedure. Laws, obligations, facts and opinions are what influence this ongoing debate; by researching learning more about this issue will slowly unravel the answer that lies beneath.
Some people believe doctors should have the ability to euthanize there patient based upon their wishes. The process leading up to an assisted suicide is long and thorough, there is paper work and legal aspects that are carefully looked over and analyzed. Two witnesses must be present, one being of no relation to the patient. The witnesses must not be entitled to any compensation. Secondly, another physician must evaluate the patient’s symptoms and medical records in order to ensure that the patient is terminally ill. Before any prescription is written, doctors must wait fifteen days and the patient must request to be euthanized again. Once the subject has asked twice to be put to death psychologist must run several test on the patient questioning their reason and motivation behind their demands. Very commonly, decisions are made out of anger
Assisted Suicide and Physicians Part Ethically Unacceptable and Morally Wrong Abstract Assisted Suicide: No Toleration Should We as a Society Play God? 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Background Terminally-ill patients choose to take their own life but require assistance. The state of Oregon classifies such an intention as assisted suicide and in legal terms through its Death with Dignity Act as when “a terminally ill Oregonian chooses to end their life through voluntary self administrating of…
Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide It’s a matter of life and death. Could you take someone’s life, if it meant ending their misery? This is the dilemma faced by millions of doctors around the world as assisted suicide, the suicide of a patient using doctor prescribed medication, takes a stance in current politics. However, the Hippocratic Oath, taken by all doctors, promises that all lives will be protected and preserved, and is a direct contradiction to the idea of assisted suicide. Those in the…
democratic rights as they determine end of life care. Doctor assisted suicide is an unalienable entitlement involving management of life, the attainment of liberty from debilitating diseases, and the pursuit of happiness despite current suffering. However, forty-eight states violate the Declaration of Independence that is essential to American beliefs and values, by prohibiting the dignified and peaceful death offered by doctor assisted suicide. Doctor assisted suicide should be legalized nationally and internationally…
rights to die with dignity where you would get either a lethal injection or a lethal drink or take a pill. There are physicians who have helped people with assisted suicide when the patient is unable to inject himself or herself with the lethal prescription drug that will end their life. Physicians have been taking on the responsible of assisted suicide in different areas of the United States and around the world. Physicians have taken an oath to help people with medicine to get better and live a…
Assisted suicide is a much safer way to die than suffering or killing yourself. Hearing the crying and weeping is better than hearing the agonizing pain of the one who is dying or the ticking and beeping of life support equipment. It is up to the patient, not the government; some people don’t have enough money because of the government in the first place giving poor people bad health insurance. Also assisted suicide is much safer than the person physically hurting themselves. Assisted suicide…
Andrew Ching Government/Period 5 9 November 2012 Doctor-Assisted Suicide Life is simply a matter of freedom – to live, prosper, fail and even die. For three decades, doctor-assisted suicide has been a hotly debated topic. From the beginning of mankind, suffering has always been within human existence. In contrast to popular belief that euthanasia is a recent phenomenon, doctor-assisted suicide was first introduced at the time medicine was invented. Since then, it has created countless ethical…
Human euthanasia, also known as assisted suicide is a controversial topic that has affected countries worldwide for an extended period of time. Assisted suicide is legal in four countries and the states of Washington and Oregon in the United States of America. Many people would argue that the decision to kill oneself is strictly a private choice that society should not have control over. That opinion assumes that suicide results when competent individuals make independent, reasonable decisions to…
Physician-Assisted Suicide Imagine lying in a hospital bed hooked up to all kinds of different machines. Doctors and nurses constantly entering the room to check up on you while you try to capture what little sleep you can muster through the pain. On top of the pain, you are suffering side effects from countless drugs. Breathing becomes an unbearable process. You have lost your appetite because you are constantly nauseated or throwing up. Doctors have given you no hope of survival; therefore, death is…
answer seems easy but add illness, doctors and family to the mix and things aren’t as clear cut. Does a patient who is suffering from pain and illness have the right to end their life with the help of a doctor? Answering that question is a little more difficult as ethics and legalities come into play. When discussing the everlasting debate over legalizing the practice of physician- assisted suicide I believe every patient has the right to choose between life and death if they can no longer benefit from…
suicide are usually psychologically unstable. They would want to die but at that period of time they are mentally unstable. When experiencing a difficult situation, they can feel depressed and think that dying is the only way out of their pain. If Assisted suicide is legalized anyone would be able to ask to die. This would mean that people who are depressed or going through a tough situation would be able to ask for it. It would become a popular choice for people who are mentally weak. They take the…