2. Label the following….
a) “One ought to respect one’s elders because it is one of God’s commandments.” This is a normative judgment because it is talking about morals. It is also labeled as religion because it claims that the morals are set by a religious figure. In this case it is God.
b) “Twice as many people today, as compared to ten years ago, believe that the death penalty is morally justified in some cases.” This is a normative judgment because it is talking about whether or not something is morally justifiable. It is labeled law because it is a case that deals with a law (punishment).
c) “It would be wrong to put an antique chair in a modern room.” This is a descriptive judgment because it does not talk about morals at all. It is simply empirical.
d) “People do not always do what they believe to be right” This one is a bit tricky. It seems to be a little bit of both because it is describing what people do based on what they believe to be right. But this could also be normative because what people believe to be right and wrong comes down to morals.
4. “Explain emotivism and intuitionism in ethical theory.”
In regards to ethical theory, emotivism explains morals in a subjective manner. The book explains that it would like saying that “murder us wrong” by saying “murder-yuck!” Or to say “courageous self-sacrifice is good” by saying “self-sacrifice-yeah!”
Intuitionism, however, “claims that our ideas about ethics rest upon some sort of intuitive
Related Documents: Ethics: Ethics and Normative Judgment Essay
Ethics and Leadership Kristen Joseph Professor Shana Nicholson April 9, 2011 Meta ethics is the branch of ethics that seeks to understand the nature of ethical properties, and ethical statements, attitudes, and judgments. Finding the answers to the questions how do we distinguish the good from the bad. Normative ethics is interested in determining the content of our moral behavior. Normative ethical theories seek to provide action-guides; procedures for answering the practical question…
Chapter 1 2) Everyday human beings are using ethics and may not even realize it. Ethics defines everything we believe in and make a stand for. It defines what is right or wrong, good and bad, and what judgments that we may make. Ethics defines our values and makes us into the person that we are. Everything that we hold dear to us is at stake when we do ethics. It helps us what decisions to make and what is more important, or a better decision. 4) Yes, your feelings can be your sole guide…
Ethics Notes Lewis and Gilman have two focuses for Public service: (1) using enforced rules or compliance systems and (2) depending on individual integrity in decision making. (pg.1) Working definitions Ethics-involves thinking systematically about morals and conduct and how we treat other people (pg.5) Values – refers to principles of action that implement or promote morals or ethics (pg.5) Morals- refers to standards of right of conduct (pg.5) Moral choice- the would-should divide, the…
According to the SEC, means "timely, meaningful and reliable disclosures about a company's performance. …. Refer to notes There are different views of CSR for different firms. So, it is significant that Company A highlights their own values and ethics as they might not incorporate the general view of CSR. The values that one company has might not reflect the values of other companies. Core characteristics of CSR Voluntary- the views of the EC and UK govt- critics of CSR see voluntarism as a…
consequentialism: The normative ethical theory that says that an act is morally right just because it produces the best actual or expected results. Act utilitarianism: The version of act consequentialism that says that only wellbeing is intrinsically valuable, and so says that an act is morally right just because it maximizes overall well-being. Ad hominem attack: An attempt to undermine the position of an opponent by criticizing his motives or character. Agnostics: Those who suspend judgment on the question…
last time: Outline of the subject matter of this course: 4 units, each reflecting a different approach to normative philosophical ethics: 1. Teleological/Consequentialist Ethics: Utilitarianism and egoism. Readings by Jeremy Bentham, John Stuart Mill, Bishop Joseph Butler; critique by Dostoevsky; some relevant contemporary feminist reflections by Marilyn Frye. 2. Deontological ethics: Immanuel Kant: Sections 1 and 2 of the Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals; Kant's notorious essay "On…
Ethics Project Ethics is a system of moral principles of conduct governing an individual or a group. This can basically be defined as the difference between right and wrong behavior. Ethics cannot be categorized as one simple definition though. Many people have their own meaning of ethics. Many people find their actions as good ethical behavior, and who is to say it is not? You cannot change how people view their own actions but when it comes to others there is always a fine line between morally…
Moral Antirealism Meta-ethics is a philosophical problem that attempts to discover what morality means. It is the focus of whether normative ethics, the value judgments of what is moral, can be impartial or commonly held. This philosophical discipline is trying to decipher what moral values means, and what people meant when they said something is “right” or “wrong.” To understand if morals are objective or universally true, meta-ethics tries to find the foundations of morals, and recognize…
Phylosiphy has 5 majors: logic, ethics, metaphescs, epistemology, Ethic branches: Metaethics, normative, descriptive. 3 def of piety 1. Doing what’s dear to gods. 2. Gods became God [all gods]. And what’s dear becomes what’s loved. 3. Piety is part of Justice. Natural law = divine law as MLK thinks. But not the man made laws. 2nd part cultivating of traits (character) The goal of man is to do something for the politics. Convention is the way what’s usually done. Ethos is focusing…
Andrew Coe September 18, 2011 Ethics v. Morality The terms “ethics” and “morality” have been topics of great debate for many centuries. Both terms are becoming ever more commonplace in casual conversation, and both are used interchangeably without much hesitation. Many scholars, however, would argue that the two terms have distinct differences – that they do not mean the same thing – and that they should be used more prudently. Authors William H. Shaw (San Jose State University) and William K. Frankena…