Skies are blue, and squirrels laugh running up their giant green homes. Cars clear their throats then roar to life. The warm sun glows and wraps around you like a golden blanket, gently touching the different colored fences that line up on every block to form a suburban rainbow. Birds stop by and visit to admire the dazzling sight, chirping with delight.
Clean and shiny, houses stand out proudly towering over the neatly trimmed, squared shaped hedges that compliment the yard. Below that is an even neater patch of grass trimmed to perfection. The sun beams down on the sidewalks and they glisten and sparkle all the way down the block desiring to be noticed. Friendly faces invite you in to their world with a smile when they see you greeting you with a good morning or a how do you do?
Time goes on, and the sun rises to the highest point in the sky engulfing us in its blazing rays. Smells of hamburgers and hot dogs on the grill fills the whole neighborhood. Oval shaped brown leather spirals in the sky falling into a kid’s outstretched hands. An orange circled shaped Spalding spins in the air before dropping with a cush in the circular basket. Kids can be heard screaming not it as they run away from their chasers trying not to get caught. A hollow wooden bat can be heard making contact with a small white sphere in the distance.
The moon and the sun trade places and darkness falls us on like a black curtain. Houses light up, glowing with life, not a single house is gloomy. Life at night is much
consent. However, the trial court dismissed Ms. Smith’s claim of the physician’s negligence, since she had not demonstrated any deviation by Dr. Shannon from the established standard of medical practice. Also, the trial court rejected Ms. Smith’s second claim, on the ground that though Dr. Shannon didn’t inform her of all risks described in the PDR, the plaintiff had failed to prove that the information “was in fact medically important or recognized risks”. The trial court especially noted that Ms.…
to be believed without inferences or conclusions from it? Direct evidence depends on the credibility of the witness. For example, W testifies that she saw D strangle V with a stocking. W’s testimony is direct evidence on the issue of whether D did in fact strangle V with a stocking, since if that testimony is believed, the issue is resolved. Circumstantial evidence depends on both the credibility of the witness and inferences from the witness. Circumstantial evidence is evidence which, even…
Q1. What is the dual-court system? Why do we have a dual court system? A. The dual-court system is the result of a general a agreement among the nation's founders about the need for individual states to retain significant legislative authority and judicial autonomy separate from federal control. The reason why we have a dual-court system is, back then; new states joining the union were assured of limited federal intervention into local affairs. The state legislatures were free…
and 28 grams under the Massachusetts Controlled Substances Act. Determination of the court: A jury trial found Melendez-Diaz guilty. Legal reasoning or rationale used by the court to reach their decision: " Various formulations of this core class of testimonial statements exist: ex parte in-court testimony or its functional equivalent — that is, material such as affidavits, custodial examinations, prior testimony that the defendant was unable to cross-examine, or similar pretrial statements that…
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WISOTA DUNCAN BLOOM, Petitioner V. STATE OF WISOTA, Respondent RESPONSE TO PETITIONERS BRIEF AND CHIEF On Appeal from the State of Wisota Court of Appeals ORAL ARGUMENT IS REQUESTED AMBROSIO E. CASTELLANO ASST. ATTORNEY GENERAL PO BOX 114 SERAFINA, NM 87701 (505) 470-7260 CONSEL FOR THE RESPODENT TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF AUTHORITIES……………………………………………………….. 3 I. Nature of the Case and Course Proceeding………………………………. 4 II. Summary…
Issue: Does the defendant have the right, under the best evidence rule to enter the radiologist’s testimony and written report instead of the actual X-ray which was lost or does the Plaintiff have the right to keep the testimony and report barred from evidence? Background: The plaintiff applied for a life insurance policy with the defendant life insurance company. The defendant wanted to make sure that the plaintiff was an “acceptable heath risk” due to an underlying heart condition on…
scientists perform several different roles in the crime investigation and legal system. While the primary role of a forensic scientist is to collect and analyze the evidence found at a crime scene, the individual may also be called upon to give expert testimony and train other law enforcement individuals in how to record and collect evidence. In the following section, we will briefly examine each of these roles. Analyzing the Evidence One of the most important roles of the forensic scientist is dealing…
controversies in the court system. The battered spouse syndrome was introduced in the 1980s and was used to explain a woman’s actions, and was used in defense by lawyers when a woman killed her husband or boyfriend due to the fact of being abused over several years. But now that syndrome also applies to men, gays and lesbians as well. In order to use this defense the evidence has to be admissible. For many trials the battered spouse syndrome was used, but the expert testimony was being viewed as…
Ila Ann Still Capstone Project Week 10 Final Application Assignment May 10, 2014 Professor Cynthia Jackson Several problems exist when it comes to laws, investigations, testimony, training, education, information sharing and the debate between the legal and psycholegal community when it pertains to the cases of child abuse. In 2012, the Federal Bureau of Investigations reported that an estimated 1,214,462 violent crimes occurred (U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation, 2012)…
circumstantial is because science cannot be clearly defined by law. The legal system have created standards and written legal rules regarding the admissibility of forensic evidence. When forensic evidence that is presented in court is rarely unaccompanied by an expert witness to provide the court room with a professional explanation backing the reliability of the forensic process used to collect the relevant evidence. This is one the…