The judge read the charges Mr. Chou was being accused of which included break and enter with intent, mischief under $50, and fail to comply with probation. The judge then explained to him his rights and options to a trial where the onus would be on the crown to prove guilt, and asked him if he was sure that he wanted to plea guilty. The crown then proceeded to read the facts of the day of the offence while disclosing that the accused was a heroin addict. The offence took place on Feb 18th the accused got onto the TTC started causing a disturbance by yelling and punching the TTC windows, he then started taking off his clothes, got off the TTC, approached a house and kicked the front door, he was found on the floor in the residence. The crown mentioned that this was done while on probation and that the accused has no mental issues; therefore this happened due to the drugs consumed. The Judge then asked the accused if he agreed with the facts in which he responded, “yes your honor”. The crown then proposed 6 months conditional sentence and 2 year probation.
The defense stated that the accused had been sober for a year prior to this therefore the hallucinations was much stronger when he relapsed. He gives a little background on the accused disclosing that he is 39 years old, and has a daughter in Caledon which he sees every other weekend. The defense tells the judge that it is important for the accused to be allowed to leave today, so that he may retain his job that is a big part in helping him stay sober and out of trouble. The judge then turned to the accused and
Related Documents: The Law Of The Case Of Mr. Chou's Law
Summary Ash Court On the 24TH April 2012 an article was written by Andrew Gregory in the Daily Mirror about shocking findings in a care home in North London. Secret filming took place after Ms Worroll started to notice bruises on her mother in various places, after just six weeks of moving into Ash Court. What was revealed on the tape was shocking, It showed Jonathan Aquino repeatedly striking her mum Marie aged 81. Marie who suffers from acute arthritis and Alzheimer's is a vulnerable elderly…
includes CJA 394 Week 3 Team Assignment Court Management Executive Summary General Questions - General General Questions Write a 350-700-word executive summary in which you articulate court purposes and responsibilities and the importance of strategic planning and vision as foundations of successful court management. Additionally, appraise the impact of court consolidation and restructuring on future court processes and responsibilities as part of court management efforts and responsibilities…
Bindrim v Mitchell ROCEDURAL POSTURE: Defendant author and defendant publisher appealed from verdicts against them on plaintiff's libel and contract counts and from a judgment for damages in favor of plaintiff in the Superior Court of Los Angeles County (California).OVERVIEW: Defendant author wrote a book about plaintiff's use of the so-called "Nude Marathon" in group therapy. As a participant, defendant author contractually agreed not to disclose what transpired. Following publication of defendant…
it on August 19, Mattel then decided it was not interested and told Lamle so in October. He sued for breach of contract, the district court dismissed the suit, Lamle appealed. ISSSUE: Does the court affirm the grant of summary judgment as to the other claims? LAW: Hamilton v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 270 F.3d 778, 782 (9th Cir. 2001) stated “The grant of summary judgment for breach of contract claims is reviewed without deference.” And Summers v. A. Teichert & Son, Inc., 127 F.3d 1150, 1152 (9th…
This document of CJA 374 Week 3 Discussion Questions and Summary shows the solutions to the following problems: DQ 1: How are the operations of the juvenile court system and adult court system similar? How are they different? DQ 2: What are the major decisions of the Supreme Court in the area of juvenile justice? What is the effect of these decisions on the juvenile justice system? DQ 3: What are the pros and cons of securely detaining a juvenile prior to any formal action to adjudicate…
Law List three categories of criminal offence, adding an example to illustrate which court each would be tried. Summary only offences Either way offences Indictable only offences Summary only offences are the less serious offences such as motoring offences, less serious assaults and other regulatory offences. Usually, these are dealt in a magistrates courts however, you may be advised otherwise. Either way offences are more serious offences: theft, more serious assaults, ABH (actual…
Hudson BUSI 301 Fall September 22, 2013 Courtroom Observation: 2008 1L Moot Court Tournament at the Liberty University School of Law, White V. Gibbs CA# -8776-CV285. This case is between the (plaintiff) Mrs. White and the (defendants) Patrick Gibbs and Stand Alone Properties, L.L.C. as O’Malley’s Tavern. A Motion of Summary Judgment on behalf of O’Malley’s Tavern in the US District Court of Northern District of Indiana. Is being argued/presented. Briefly; Mrs. White is suing…
Magistrates court in relation to criminal cases.(14 marks) There are three main categories which are used to decide how serious the offence is. If it is a minor offence such as driving without insurance it is called a Summary offence. If it is an offence which is not minor nor serious ,such as common assault, it is called a Triable either way offence. If it is an offence which is very serious ,such as manslaughter, it is categorised under an Indictable offence. In relation to the Magistrates court only…
Research summary: Angela Wimbley Strayer University 5-6-2013 Research Summary Methods of Judicial Selection, qualifications, and terms of office: California The number of judges in Supreme Court is 7, 102 for Court of Appeals, and 1535 for Superior Court. On the number of Circuits/Districts, for Supreme Court is none, 6 for Court of Appeals, and 58 for Superior Court. The geographic basis for selection in Supreme Court is statewide, district for Court of Appeals, and county for Superior…
the grounds on promissory estoppel. The circuit court granted the motion and awarded N&W $47,000 in damages. Hinson appealed that the circuit court was wrong in awarding the summary judgment in favor of N&W because no contract had been formed between the parties, the elements of promissory estoppel had not been established and the record lacks evidence supporting the elements of a negligent misrepresentation claim. The judgment of the circuit court of the first judicial district of hinds county was…