Opinion
Chief Justice ROBERTS delivered an opinion with respect to Parts I-IV.
I. In Sebelius, this Court held that the individual mandate was not a valid exercise of Congress’s power under the Commerce Clause and the Necessary and Proper Clause. National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius, 132 S.Ct. 2566, 2582 (2012). The revised individual mandate is invalid for virtually identical reasons. The Constitution grants Congress the power to “regulate Commerce.” Art. I, §8, cl.3. This Court stated that “[t]he power to regulate commerce presupposes the existence of commercial activity to be regulated.” Sebelius at 2586. The individual mandate, when it was presented, was not a part of existing commercial or economic activity. The purpose of the individual mandate was to compel people to purchase health insurance. As stated in Sebelius, there has never been precedent giving Congress the ability to compel people to participate in unwanted commercial activity under the Commerce Clause. Id at 2586. “The Framers gave Congress the power to regulate commerce, not to compel it, and for over 200 years both our decisions and Congress’s actions have reflected this understanding.” Id at 2589. The suit at hand is distinguishable because at the time the Sebelius decision was released, no one had yet been required to participate in the individual mandate or pay a penalty for not participating. Now, in 2018, individuals all over the United States have both purchased health insurance because of the individual mandate or elected to pay the penalty for not purchasing insurance. Although Sebelius struck down the individual mandate as invalid under the Commerce Clause, it is now the time to reexamine whether the individual mandate is an existing commercial activity.
In order to answer this question, we must examine the results of the individual mandate as enacted in Sebelius. The first result is that individuals have decided to purchase insurance that, prior to the ACA, chose not to have health insurance. Primarily, these individuals chose to purchase insurance to avoid paying the shared responsibility payment (“penalty”). That brings us to the second result. The individuals who opted out of purchasing insurance had to pay a penalty to the IRS. Since the penalty was upheld as a tax controlled by the taxing power of Congress in Sebelius, there is no reason to examine the validity of the tax under the Commerce Clause. Art. I, §8, cl.1. What does need to be considered, however, is the status of the first result.
Does the fact that prior uninsured individuals now participate in the health insurance market due to the individual mandate constitute “commerce”? In other words, does the individual mandate’s effect on the insurance market now give Congress power under the Commerce Clause that they did not have in Sebelius? United States v. Lopez identifies Congressional authority under the Commerce Clause in three categories of activities; (1) the channels of interstate commerce; (2) the instrumentalities of interstate commerce; or (3) economic activities having a substantial effect upon interstate commerce. United States v. Lopez, 115 S.Ct. 1624, 559 (1995). The individual mandate is not related to the channels of interstate commerce (roadways, waterways, etc.). Additionally, the individual mandate is not related to protecting the instrumentalities of interstate commerce (cars, ships, aircraft, etc.). Therefore, if the revised individual mandate is to be sustained, it must substantially affect existing interstate commerce (emphasis added).
Arguably, the revised individual mandate could be considered an essential part of an existing economic activity, i.e. the health insurance market. It could also be argued that without the individual mandate, there would be a dissimilar incentive to purchase health insurance and therefore, it substantially affects interstate commerce. However, the current aim of the revised individual mandate has not changed
Constitutional Law Outline Course Themes What does the Constitution do? 1. Establishes national government & allocates power among the branches 2. Controls relationship between federal & state government (federalism) 3. Limits governmental power and protects individual rights Why must we interpret the Constitution? 1. Many important topics not addressed in text 2. Many provisions written in broad language that needs interpretation 3. Constitution rarely functions…
Constitutional Law Where does FED or STATE legislature get its power? 1. Congress i. – if abused their powers. It is up to the court to interpret it (Marbury v. Madison) 1. They don’t have the power, because it is not enumerated. Our govt is a govt of enumerated powers, or 2. Power was exceeded 14th Amend. § 5 Kimmel Test to see if the Congress esceeded ii. If breached its limits. There are immunities and privileges of the people and if they pass a law that breaches it Amend 14th §1 then…
the power of Congress to override state sovereignty, even when exercising its otherwise plenary powers to tax or to regulate commerce.” The court found that requiring states to pay their employees the minimum wage violated the Tenth Amendment b/c the law “operates to directly displace the States freedom to structure integral operations in areas of traditional governmental functions.” The court explained that forcing state and local governments to pay their employees the minimum wage would require that…
The pros and cons of voters I.D I am writing this essay to tell you some things about the pros and cons of voter ID. One of the biggest political issues today is the up and coming debates about photo ID laws. This is a law that requires voters to show identification in order to vote. Some states even make you a have a photo ID, and without one you can’t vote. The states that are the strictest on these laws are Pennsylvania, Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, and Tennessee. First I would like to start you…
to have a mercy killing” or on the other hand does the law say “No, it’s not okay to have this practice.” What you might find when you look into this topic of “is it legal” is there are always loopholes in the law. There is almost always a way around or through something. The different opinion and choice you would probably have if you were actually in the predicament of having to make that final decision. There are many different pros and cons of this topic and I’m going to walk through a few of them…
Neo- con Essay. America and Islamic extremists have opposed each other in beliefs for over a hundred years. The adoption of the Neo- Conservative mindset as a result of the September 11 attacks on the world trade centre resulted in even more tension between Islamic extremists and the US. This resulted in a decade of war between the US and the extremists. The US has a history of Neo Conservatives in the government, this movement was started by Leo Strauss in the 1940’s, and this led to the split…
Goodin affirms that political parties are instrumental in fulfilling the central democratic idea of citizens giving ‘laws to themselves’ through participation in the elections not just as voters but also candidates. Political parties define, popularize and advocate a particular ‘ratio’, which represents the peoples’ needs and wants. A no-party system lacks the much-needed…
Victoria Bolshakova Point-Counterpoint Persuasive Essay October 21, 2014 Is Obama abusing executive power and weakening our nation? According to Article II, Section 1 Clause 1 of the Constitution “The Executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America.” (Wikipedia. Wikimedia Foundation, n.d. Web. 21 Oct. 2014.) This passage refers to the significance that the President holds in the executive power. These authority entities the influence of the affairs of the government…
one function is to kill. Guns are lethal weapons. “In 2010, guns took the lives of 31,076 Americans in homicides, suicides and unintentional shootings. This is the equivalent of more than 85 deaths each day and more than three deaths each hour” (The Law Center. 2012). Guns have a negative effect on the public as it has brought up hospitals bills, crimes, death rates and suicides. Crime and death rates increased as the number of guns being carried increased. Our right to bear arms has been misused under…
of homosexuals is increasing rapidly, which means the number of people in favor of same-sex adoption and gay marriage should also be on the rise. But same-sex adoption issue is being controversial between the societies. In this essay I will discuss the problem, pros and cons of same-sex adoption to show the opinion of those people. There are many reasons why people support the same sex adoption to be legalized. The pros of same-sex adoption for children, firstly, child adoption by homosexuals better…