Introduction
I. Risk Assessment
II. Non-substantive Planning Analytics
III. Debt trade Ledger
Conclusion
Appendix
Introduction
The purpose of this paper is to provide a report to the Audit Engagement Partner, Little Diggers Ltd, which comprises a summary of the elements of the audit risks model, the assessment of materiality levels, the performance of non-substantive planning analytics and the audit procedures performed in order to establish the key financial statement assertions of existence and valuation.
The independent Audit firm, “Jones Cleese and Chapman”, is appointed to carry out an effective investigation of the Little Diggers records and the financial statements prepared under the responsibility of the directors. The firm acts as an external auditor, which according to its definition, must perform an independent examination and verification of the evidence regarding the assertions upon which the financial statements of an organization are based, in order to obtain reasonable assurance that the financial statements are free from material misstament and thereby express an opinion as to whether the financial statements represent a “true and fair view” and have been prepared in accordance with the applicable reporting framework.
According to ISA 200 the “Overall objectives of the independent auditor and the conduct of an audit” is to enhance the degree of confidence of intended users in the financial statements. This is achieved and guaranteed if the auditor acts according to the following principals: Objectivity, Professional behavior, Professional Competence and due care, Integrity, Confidentiality.
I Risk Assessment
The audit risk is the risk that the auditor provides an inappropriate audit opinion. This is further developed by ISA 315 (revised) Identifying and Assessing the Risks of Material Misstatement Through Understanding the Entity and its Environment as the objective of the auditor to identify and assess the risk of material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, at the financial statement and assertion levels, through understanding the entity and its environment, including the entity’s internal control, thereby providing a basis for designing and implementing responses to the assessed risks of material misstatement. (definition)
1.1 Understanding the Entity’s Environment (ISA 315)
Little Diggers Ltd is a large manufacturer of construction machinery based in the UK. It operates in the manufacturing industry of construction, demolition and agriculture.
Audit Risk is comprised of two components: Risk of material misstatement and detection risk.
The inherent risks for the Little Diggers Ltd include:
-There is a constant pressure made by the CEO Joseph Bamthorpe that the Company be listed on the London Stock Exchange and it requires stronger sales and profits. This constitutes a primary reason to believe that Inventories have been manipulated and show a significant increase of 46.40% in order to decrease in Cost of sales and boost in Revenue. This puts under question the Existence assertion of the Inventories, especially after this has also been a problem raised by the previous auditors and also by the internal Control.
-transactions are made in different currencies. This makes the Valuation Assertion more difficult to assess. Purchases made in various currencies might raise issues at the inflation rates and exchange rate.
Control Risks:
-Stock control, as assimilated by last year Auditors and internal control. The significant increase in Inventories makes difficult to count. Therefore the existence assertion is doubtful.
-Lack of non-executives board members. The purpose of non-executives board members is, as stated by “The Cadbury Report”, produced in 1992, “they should bring an independent judgment
COBIT Control Assessment Questionnaire The key to maintaining profitability in a technologically changing environment is how well you maintain control. COBIT's Control Objectives provides the critical insight needed to delineate a clear policy and good practice for IT controls. Included are the statements of desired results or purposes to be achieved by implementing the 318 specific, detailed control objectives throughout the 34 IT processes. - IT Governance Institute Audit Information:…
Internal Controls: policies and procedures designed to provide management with reasonable assurance that the company achieves its objectives and goals -Internal Controls are what drives the audit we look at the internal controls form both management and auditor perspective As an auditor what needs to be done to understand control risk Three Objectives 1. Reliability of Financial Reporting: fairly presented in accordance with IFRS or ASPE to provide reliable information to shareholders and…
Name: Essay I –Internal controls I. Internal Controls: Internal control structures minimize risk to the company that objectives will not be achieved. Internal control is a process, put into place by the board of directors, management and other personnel, designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the achievement of objectives in the following categories: A. Operations: Helps to assure effectiveness and efficiency. B. Reporting: Assures reliability of reporting. C. Compliance: Helps…
Session 1 These must be present to conduct an audit: Information and Established Criteria- there must be info in verifiable form -audited information must be compared against a standard ex. GAAP for FS or Tax Act for Taxes Accumulating and Evaluating Evidence- evidence used to establish whether information audited is in accordance with criteria...need to obtain sufficient evidence for audit objectives Competent, Independent Person- auditor must be qualified to understand material used…
Integrated Audit An integrated audit is when there is an audit of internal controls over financial reporting and an audit of financial statements both being conducted on an entity. The integrated audit integrates the audit of financial statements and the audit of internal controls and is conducted by the same auditor. Both the audit of financial statements and the audit of internal controls are conducted not only by the same auditor but are conducted at the same time. An integrated audit includes…
Q1: Discuss how the SEC has influence (if any) over the audit of Smackey Dog Foods, Inc. Solution: The SEC (Securities and Exchange Commission) has a great influence on the audit of Smackey Dog Foods, Inc., which is conducted by Keller CPAs. When auditing a publicly held company, auditors need to observe principles. The ethical principles of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) Code of…
Slide #1 Introductions of CAE and audit team. Today, we are going to discuss our Internal Audit Department’s LongTerm Audit Plan including how we will decide what to audit and when and conclude with placing our most important conclusions into an easy to understand RiskAssessment Matrix. Slide #2 The Internal Audit Department follows the Institute of Internal Auditor’s (IIA) International Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing (Standards). Included in these Standards is the…
directed. It refers to the way the rights and responsibilities are distributed among the board, company management, shareholders and other stakeholders. Issues involving corporate governance include Internal controls and internal auditors Independence of external auditors and quality of their audit Oversight and management of risk Oversight of the preparation of financial statements Review of compensation agreements with senior executives Resources available to directors to carry out their duties Nomination…
Internal Control Risks Internal control risk is defined as the part of an audit risk that relates to a clients internal control system. Internal controls maintain five components; control environment, process of risk assessment of an organization, information processing, control activities and monitoring controls. The auditors perform tests in order to evaluate the effectiveness of these five component controls. If the result from the auditor’s testing shows the client’s internal control system to…
Audit Design Part I ACC/546 August 11, 2014 Allan Foster Audit Design Part I ANDERSON, OLDS, and WATERSHED, CPAs Portland, Maine 04101 December 15, 2007 Mr. Larry Lancaster, President Apollo Shoes 3671 New Age Drive Portland, Maine 04101 Dear Mr. Lancaster: This letter is to confirm the engagement of Anderson, Olds, and Watershed’s services to provide an audit of the financial statements by examining the internal controls. Anderson, Olds, and Watershed (AOW) will consult with…