In both cases, the defendants argued how they client was identified and that it was a violation of one of their amendments. However, since they were easily identified by an eye witness this was easy for they officers to close their case. References; Samaha, Joel. (2012). Criminal Procedure, 8th, Ed. Boston, MA: Gardner, T. J.& Anderson, T. J. (2013). Criminal Evidence (8th ed.) Belmont, CA: Wadsworth. Perry…
Words 316 - Pages 2