Zimbardo Research Paper Leslie Massey PSYCH/620 01/22/2015 Professor Sharon McNelly
Zimbardo Research Paper The Stanford Prison Experiment was a study conducted in 1971 by Dr. Phillip Zimbardo. According to Dr. Steve Taylor (2007), “It’s probably the best known psychological study of all time.” (Classic Studies in Psychology, 2007). Zimbardo stated that the point was to see what would happen if he put “really good people in a bad place” (Dr. Zimbardo, 2007). He did this during a time were most college students were protesting for peace and were against anything authoritarian. The experiment contained both positive and negative aspects; which will be discussed further in this paper. Value of the Study The value of Three students had to leave because of the abuse and the whole experiment was shut down in only five days because of the increase chance of psychological damage due to the abuse. The mock-guards jumped into their role, but they were given no guidelines; no regulations. They took their role as the authority figure too far. Before beginning this study, the mock-guards should have been given some sort of “do not cross” line for their safety and for the safety of the mock-prisoners. The point of the study is to see what would happen if good people were put in a bad situation. Psychologically breaking the participants and opening up new, abusive behaviors in the guards could have been prevented. Safeguards Safeguards have been put in place to reduce the likelihood of ethical concerns arising in research studies to protect the participants and the good standing of experiments or research. Although some of the safeguards are too strict and can interfere with research; there are some experiments that could use sterner regulations. Participants should be given the opportunity to leave the experiment as soon as they no longer feel comfortable. It is also important to remain upfront and honest about the research. Many experiments require participants not to know what the research is observing, however; it is unethical to use dishonestly to lure people into agreeing to participate. Questionnaires
Zimbardo Research Paper Psych/620 Zimbardo Research Paper Zimbardo Research Introduction Philip Zimbardo is a professor and a psychologist. He is in charge as a leader to the researchers/scientists in the Stanford Prison Experiment. Stanford Prison Experiment was a research that recognized the psychological influences of persons, engaging upright individuals in a wicked place. The worth of the Stanford Prison Experiment a part of the social psychology. Social psychology is the systematic endeavor…
scrutinized for their ineffective use or lack of establishment of ethical principles within their research. Zimbardo’s Stanford Prison Experiment and Milgram’s Obedience experiment were ridiculed for the lack of ethics involved. Although these experiments caused unnecessary harm to their subjects they also acted as the foundation for the establishment of the Belmont Report, which in itself, would change research forever. Ethics in the Name of Science Two very controversial experiments have been…
Ethics and the Stanford Prison Experiment In 1971 Philipp Zimbardo carried out one of the most ethically controversial psychological experiment the ‘Stanford Prison Experiment’. Originally he aimed to study how much our behavior is structured by the social role we occupy. Describing the study briefly 24 undergraduates with no criminal and psychological record were chosen for the research to play the roles of prisoners and guards in a mock prison situated in the basement of Stanford University…
Psychology Erica Mariscal Vigil PSYCH 620 Diana Wheatley 04/07/2014 Stanford Prison Experiment and Social Psychology Dr. Philip Zimbardo, a faculty member at Stanford University, conducted the Stanford Prison Experiment in 1971. The experiment was conducted in the basement of the psychology department at Stanford. According to Zimbardo, they study was “an attempt to see what happens when you put really good people in a bad place” (Classic Studies in Psychology, 2012). There were…
Q 1. Critique the power of organizations from Weberian and Goffmanesque perspectives in the Stanford Prison This document briefly reviews and critiques the ideas of Weber and Goffman in applying them to the Standard Prison Experiment. Weber identified the significance of bureaucracy within organizations. Within the bureaucratic organization there is a stratification of hierarchy where the legal legitimate authority is invested in individuals who exercise command on the basis of rules and…
Chloe Chen Psychology 30: Lucifer Effect Paper Prepare a 8-10 page book report on the Lucifer Effect. You are to apply what you’ve learned about Social Psychology throughout the paper—please cite your sources properly. What is the book about and who is the author? Then, give an introduction for the book by giving an overview. The Lucifer Effect is a book written by Philip Zimbardo, who is a famous psychologist and a professor emeritus of Stanford University. He was also known for the famous…
California in order to educate students on fascism during the holocaust; we have learned a lot about the psychological manner of humans from this experiment. A similar experiment to the one conducted in The Wave was The Stanford Prison Experiment. In this paper I will be discussing the experiment conducted in The Wave, The Stanford Prison Experiment, and finally comparing and contrasting the two. The Wave is a movie made to re-enact an experiment that was conducted by a high school teacher in California…
Dr. Zimbardo uses a situationist perspective on the ways through which anti-social behavior is understood, treated and prevented. This view contrasts with the traditional dispositional perspective, which locates evil within individual predispositions and looks at a person's internal factors and traits. The situationist perspective is different in that, unlike the dispositional perspective, it often uses experimental and laboratory research to demonstrate vital phenomena, whereas other perspectives…
‘Is Deindividuation the ‘loss of self?’ Explain with reference to theories and empirical research.’ Deindividuation, one of the most recognised consequences of crowd behaviour (Postmes & Spears, 1998), has traditionally been defined as a state where individuals in a crowd are ‘able to indulge in forms of behavior in which, when alone, they would not indulge,’ (Festinger et al., 1952). Researchers in Social Psychology have identified a number of variables that contribute to deindividuation (Guerin…
who understand these concepts grow as well. These talented individuals can be looked at from several different viewpoints and depending on who that person may be could in fact determine whether it is a positive viewpoint or a negative one. In this paper I will prove why it is necessary to have Ethical Hackers in today’s security models and how they have come a long way to improve how our information systems operate in a more secure manner. Hacker’s for years have been able to do things that the…
