A common question among historians is that should World War I and World War II be all considered one war. While it is currently considered two different wars, some may disagree. Me personally, I think that they should be considered two separate wars. While they both happened within a 50-year time period, they were fought over two different reasons. Also there was a time of peace without warfare separating the two wars, so saying they were one war, is like saying someone playing a soccer game, recovering, then days later playing a different game and say it was all one game. World War I began when Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria was assassinated by Serbia. Before this, there were alliances made by European powers to have extra protection for one another. The alliances were the Triple Alliance, which consisted of Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Italy, as well as the Triple Entente, which consisted of Britain, France, and Russia. World War II didn’t consist of the same alliances, meaning that there was some sort of a significant change in between the two wars, allowing the two wars to be distinctively different from each another. While World War I was caused by alliances clashing, World War II began from one big player, Germany. Germany plays a huge role in World War II, giving an unbalance in participation between the European powers. Whereas in World War I, the participation in the war by the European powers was fairly balanced due to the alliances, giving another distinctive difference in the two wars. Also in World War II, there was involvement of countries not in the European area, like Japan and China. This expands the “playing field” of the war, as well as their being some battles in Africa, as well as exploring into the Pacific and battling there, which can cause major differences between World War II and World War I, and again separating them further, making them look more like two wars than one. World War I technology was different from the second war. World War I was fought mostly in trenches. Early airplanes were used. Poisonous gas gave a big advantage to those with the technology. In World War 2, tanks were used as the main deployment in many areas. Planes saw technological improvement, and bombers heavily used. Submarines became more popular as a way to win water warfare. Secret codes were used as a way to communicate between others, so any unknown people who may try to read it, are unable to understand what it means. The second World War was much more technologically advanced than the first, showing that there was much time and experimenting able to be done between each war, again shoving them further apart. World War I was caused mainly by the tension between all the countries and alliances gathering together. With alliances being made, that creates stronger and stronger forces, which may bring fear to countries and make them want to form alliances. So with all these strong forces, tension rose quickly, and when the Archduke of Austria was assassinated, that was what caused all the tension to go into warfare. World War II was nothing like this, as Germany struck fear into
War of the Worlds by H.G. Wells is a fiction story written about war and mankind’s coming of age. It is also a philosophical novel with many deep meanings underlying the shallow looking on what happened when the Martians came. Obviously the whole book is about the struggle mankind faces, but it is not always with aliens, they are actually more of a good way to represent what Wells really believed. He believed man is dominant, yet should remember how big the universe is. The narrator, who is also…
World War I The United States originally had a policy of isolationism, avoiding conflict while trying to find peace. This resulted in increased tensions with Berlin and London. When a German U-boat sank the British liner Lusitania in 1915, with 128 Americans aboard, U.S. President Woodrow Wilson vowed, "America was too proud to fight" and demanded an end to attacks on passenger ships. Germany complied. Wilson unsuccessfully tried to mediate a settlement. He repeatedly warned the U.S. would not…
THE POST-WORLD WAR I Revolution and Change in Russia - Russia was rapidly becoming industrialized. Their leaders wanted their country to be one of the great imperialist powers of the world. They set up a sphere of influence in Chinese Manchuria, they next sought to gain control of northern Korea. Japan also wanted northern Korea. After protesting unsuccessfully against Russia’s presence there, Japan declared war with Russia. -> Japan won. The Revolution of 1905: - Businesspeople, professionals…
How does the director Steven Spielberg, use film techniques to convey one or more themes in his film, War of the Worlds? Steven Spielberg utilizes many techniques, in his film, War of the Worlds, including camera work, actors and sound effects to convey various themes such as family relationships. An initial scene, ‘Eve of the War’, establishes the relationships amongst the family especially around the central character Ray Ferrier (Tom Cruise) which are built upon in ‘Coming of the Invaders’. ‘Worst…
horrors of a bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki are unimaginable. To be able countries fight with nuclear weapons. A nuclear war has never happened, but because nuclear weapons are extremely powerful and could cause destruction throughout the world, even a small nuclear weapon has enough potential to wipe out an entire city. Nuclear bombs were first invented during World War II. They were used to bombard two cities of Japan to convince them to forfeit. Despite its ability to cause destruction, nuclear…
The Atrocities of WW2 | December 3 2012 | | Who is most to blame? | Article 147 of the Fourth Geneva Convention defines war crimes as wilful killing, torture or inhuman treatment, including... wilfully causing great suffering or serious injury to body or health, unlawful deportation or transfer or unlawful confinement of a protected person, compelling a protected person to serve in the forces of a hostile power, or wilfully depriving a protected person of the rights of fair and regular…
its pictures.” (4) atmosphere - description of people very shy and unassuming. - pictures alter as war goes on – people are waving at camera (5) - on the picture of the dazed Robert: “You know it will obtrude again and again until you find its meaning – here.” (6) - Robert “doubts the validity in all this martialling of men but the doubt is inarticulate.” That Robert opposed the war says a lot about the circumstances – Rowena’s death, his mother – that drove him to enlist - Rowena…
The First World War; The Arms Race Or The Assassination Of Archduke Ferdinand In Sarajevo In 1914? The First World War was the product of years of tension and competition between the Great Powers. There were many separate disputes between the different countries. However these disputes had not led to war. The arms race was a very significant cause to the war, however all this nationalism needed a trigger to ignite the smoldering hostilities and led to the outbreak of the First World War. Two bullets…
Arshdeep Singh 3/31/11 Mr. Rod 1st p WW1 Essay In the 19th century when WW1 ended with the signing of the Treaty of Versailles. It left many long term causes some of them being the Ottoman Empire, Germany, and the Austro-Hungarian Empire all fell. But due to their falling it lead to new colonies being made in their place by the people. The leading cause to all the demolition after ww1 and ww1 are Militarism and military plans, Alliance system, Imperialism, Mass Politics, Intellectual Context…
WORLD WAR I A Social Studies Unit by Jami Hodges On June 28, 1914, Archduke Francis Ferdinand (heir to the AustrianHungarian throne) was assassinated during a visit to Sarajevo. At the time of the assassination, Bosnia was the focal point of a dispute between Austria-Hungary and Serbia. The Austrian-Hungarian government was convinced that Serbia was behind the assassination and used the event as an excuse to crush its enemy. Upon declaration of war a chain reaction began leading most of…