Chapter 7 –
Duty of Care in Negligence
Categories Approach to negligence
Negligence is a form of action on the case: for the indirect intentional infliction of personal injury (wilful injury) Negligence is comprised of three primary elements: (THIS IS NOT FOR DUTY OF CARE)
1. The defendant must have owed the plaintiff a duty of care.
2. that duty must have been breached.
3. that breach must have caused damage to the plaintiff.
In broad terms, a duty of care exists when there is a sort of a 'relationship' or a proximity between the defendant and the plaintiff. To establish a duty of care, the test is one of reasonable foreseeability:
A defendant will owe a duty of care to a plaintiff where it is reasonably foreseeable that his act (not omission) act might harm the plaintiff: CLA, s 5B (1) (a), Donoghue v Stevenson.
Requirements of duty of care
Duty of care is the obligation to avoid acts or omissions which are reasonably foreseeable to cause damage to another.
There are three elements:
A reasonable foreseeability of real risk to P either as an identifiable individual or as a member of a class of persons;
The existence of proximity between the parties with respect to the act or omission;
Absence of any rule that precludes such a duty.
Donoghue v Stevenson
The outcomes of Donoghue v. Stevenson established several legal principles and precedents:
Negligence. Firstly, the House of Lords ruling affirmed that negligence is a tort. A plaintiff can take civil action against a respondent, if the respondent’s negligence causes the plaintiff injury or loss of property. Previously the plaintiff had to demonstrate some contractual arrangement for negligence to be proven, such as the sale of an item or an agreement to provide a service. Since Donoghue had not purchased the drink, she could prove no contractual arrangement with Stevenson – yet Lord Atkin’s judgement established that Stevenson was still responsible for the integrity of his product.
Duty of care. Secondly, the case established that manufacturers have a duty of care to the end consumers or users of their products. According to Lord Atkin’s ratio decendi, “a manufacturer of products, which he sells… to reach the ultimate consumer in the form in which they left him… owes a duty to the consumer to take reasonable care”. This precedent has evolved and now forms the basis of laws that protect consumers from contaminated or faulty goods. These protections began as common law but many have since been codified in legislation, such as the Trade Practices Act (Commonwealth, 1974).
Neighbour principle. Thirdly, the Donoghue v. Stevenson case produced Lord Atkin’s controversial ‘neighbour principle’, which extended the tort of negligence beyond the tortfeasor and the immediate party. It raised the question of exactly which people might be affected by negligent actions. In Donoghue’s case she had not purchased the ginger beer but had received it as a gift; she was a neighbour rather than a party to the contract. Atkin said of this principle: “You must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which you can reasonably foresee would be likely to injure your neighbour. Who, then, in law, is my neighbour? The answer seems to be persons who are so closely and directly affected by my act that I ought to have them in [mind] when I am [considering these] acts or omissions.”
The rule in negligence is that the defendant owes a duty of care not to harm his neighbor but he does not owe a duty of care to save his neighbor. However, the situation is different, if it is an omission that is giving rise to a duty to act. This is where some special or exceptional relationship exists between the parties which give rise to the liability for failure to act such as control and supervision role, duty of protection – school and student, parent and child. Home Office v Dorset Yacht Co Ltd 1970 7 boys from a reform school who were working on an island under the control and supervision of 3 prison
illegal per se – adhesion, unconscionable, one-sided - capacity to contract competency, appreciation of entrance into contract minority – disaffirm before 18 (letter of intent/scholarship?) restitution co-signature of parent Coogan’s law (15% of child actor’s money) in California Fraud, duress, mutual mistake - valid, void, voidable - statute of fraud over one year – needs to be in writing - implied and express implied – quasi (justifiably relied on another’s promise)…
amendment- in all criminal prosecutions the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial,by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed which district shall have been previously ,ascertained by law , and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defence 8th amendment-…
Warren On behalf of Team A: Contents ANALYSIS FOR SUCCESSFUL LAWSUIT REPORT 3 Purpose 3 Factual Background 3 Issue 4 Roadmap 4 GROUNDS OF LIABILITY 5 Remedies for Negligence 5 Statutes Governing Contract Law 5 ANALYSIS OF NATIONAL BANK’S LIABILITY 7 Tort of Negligence 7 SUMMARY 10 DEFENSES AGAINST LIABILTY 10 Other Considerations 10 Analysis of Income 11 Offer and Acceptance Analysis 12 Summary 14 CONCLUSION 15 RECOMMENDATIONS 15 ANALYSIS FOR SUCCESSFUL LAWSUIT…
Under the Scope: Rice v. Paladin Enterprises, Inc. In Rice v. Paladin Enterprises, Inc. Mildred Horn’s relatives and representatives sued Paladin Enterprises, Inc. claiming that the publishing company crossed the line of what constitutes protected speech under the First Amendment. Rice argues that Paladin aided and abetted Lawrence Horn and James Perry in the triple homicide of Horn’s ex-wife, Mildred Horn, their eight-year-old son, Trevor, and Trevor’s nurse, Janice Saunders. After an ugly divorce…
1CONTRACTS OUTLINE By Dr. Robert R. Wills I. AGREEMENT A. Offer –An offer is defined as an indication of willingness to enter into a contract. An offeror is the person making the offer. An offeree is the person to whom the offer is made. 1. Essentials of an Offer –An offer must be communicated to the offeree, must manifest an intent to enter into a contract, and must be sufficiently definite and certain. a. Communication–To have the mutual assent required to form a contract, the offeree must…
Chapter one Business Law Law is a set of rules, enforceable by the courts, which regulate the government of the state and governs the relationship between the state and its citizens and between one citizen and another. There are various ways in which the law may be classified; the most important are: * Public and private law * A) Public law is concerned with the relationship between the state and its citizens. Specialised areas are: 1. Constitutional law is concerned with the workings…
Chapter 10 Key Terms Civil Law: the body of law concerning noncriminal matters, such as business contracts and personal injury Criminal Law: the body of law concerning felony and misdemeanor offenses by individuals against other persons and property Misdemeanor: classified as class A, B, or C, a misdemeanor may be punished by fine and/or jail sentence Felony: a serious crime punished by fine and prison confinement Jurisdiction: a court’s authority to hear a particular case Original Jurisdiction:…
Legal Notes Yearly exams Year 11 The legal System- Topic 1 Definitions- Rules-set boundaries of behaviour to certain groups Laws- sets boundaries of behaviour to everyone Anarchy- Rules are not applied to communities Fairness- Treating people how everyone believes they deserve to be treated, taking into account differences. Justice- Appropriate punishment applied to criminals etc. Custom- How people act, do things etc. Sanction- Consequence of something. A punishment Morality- What we think…
| |Figure 3 – Structure of the Supreme Court |6 | A court is where meetings are held. It is a session of an official body that has authority to try criminals, resolved dispute, or make other legal decisions. The main aims of the court is to maintain social order. For this, the courts interpret legislation and apply the legislation to solve disputes between citizens…
Torts Outline #1 Thomas Goodwyn 30 November 2012 INTENTIONAL TORTS TO PLAINTIFF’S PERSON Battery – § 18(1) Intentionally (2) harmful or offensive contact (3) causation Harmful contact – causes physical damage or injury Offensive contact – it offends a reasonable sense of personal dignity Physical Contact to person isn’t required Anything connected to the P’s person is viewed as part of the P’s person Morgan v. Loyacomo alleged shoplifter- contact with P’s body not required=L Leichtman v. Madden…