There were many negligent acts that took place on the opening night of Bobby Robino’s Rib and Chicken Restaurant.
The first act occurred when Bobby accidently spilled the BoBo sauce on the floor of the restaurant while serving Mr. and Mrs. Obese. As an employee of Bobby Robino’s Rib and Chicken Restaurant, it is Bobby’s duty to clean up the trail of sauce on the floor in a reasonable amount of time, five minutes, to prevent any safety-related accidents. The duty was breached when Bobby, while carrying the saucy platter, Bobby failed to notice his mistake and carelessly continued to serve customers.
But for the Bobby’s action of negligently spilled sauce and not cleaning it up in a reasonable time, Luella would not have slid down the floor and slam into a salad cart which collided with table #27 and cause Bones’ chair to tip over and cause him to break his finger, and the same salad cart also causing Brew and Beano (who were seated at table #27 also) to choke on baby back ribs, since their table was also smashed into. It is reasonably foreseeable that the spilled sauce that was left out and not cleaned up in a reasonable amount of time would cause someone, like Luella, to slip on it and fall. It is also reasonably foreseeable that the neglected sauce mess which wasn’t cleaned in a reasonable amount of time would cause someone, like Luella, to slip and fall and slam into a salad cart, causing the cart to be projected. It is reasonably foreseeable that sauce on the floor which was ignored and not cleaned in a reasonable amount of time would cause someone, like Luella, to lose her balance, push into a salad cart, send it flying into a table, like table #27, and cause a chair, like Bones’, to tip over and cause him to break his finger. It is also reasonably foreseeable that sauce that was left out on a center aisle and not cleaned up in a reasonable amount of time would result in someone, like Luella, to slip and slide, fall into a salad cart, cause the cart to start moving into a table, like table #27, and cause a chair, like Bones’, to move and cause him to break his finger, and for the same salad cart to cause others, like Brew and Beano, at the table to be startled and to choke on their food. Concerning Bobby Robino’s liability, he is not responsible for Mr. and Mrs. Obese as there was no negligent act nor injury that directly impacted them. Larry Lunch, in addition, cannot sue Bobby because he too was not affected by the negligent acts. On the other hand, Luella Lunch can sue for monetary compensation concerning her physical/mental injury. Bones, Brew, and Beano are also able to pursue compensation for their injury/distress because of the negligent act which took place. The Saturday night in no way ended there. Johnny Joke decided to be funny by taking advantage of the sauce on the floor and attempted to “sauce surf”. This action is outside of the proximate cause zone and makes Joke an intervening causor. As for Bobby Robino’s liability, from this point forward, he is no longer at fault since an intervening causor exists.
Joke had the duty to avoid the mess and not to walk through the mess of sauce. Joke breached the duty by intentionally sliding through the center aisle and trying to ‘”sauce serf”. But for the negligent act of Joke “surfing” through the sauce in the restaurant, he would have not crashed through the front picture window of Bobby Robino’s Ribs and Chicken, and tumble into the parking lot, causing the oncoming driver Wanda Whiplash to slam on her breaks, and thus having her breaks lock up and swerve to the right and hit Donald Dump’s parked car which he was occupying and having his passenger, Marla Maiden, injured and resulting into additional injuries for Dump and Maiden.
It is reasonably foreseeable that someone, like Joke, “sauce surfing” down an aisle at a fast speed would result in that person crashing through the front picture window of a restaurant and end up in the parking
Basic principles of the Tort of Negligence 1. What are the differences between Contract and Tort? 1) Requirement for the contact: offer acceptance and consideration between the parties to form a legally binding agreement. (whereas in tort, there is no agreement between the parties) The parties are known to each other, and they are consensus parties. The compensation for breach of contract is to put the eviction in a position as if the obligations were fulfilled. 2) Tort is a wrongful act or…
Torts of negligence are breaches of duty that results to injury to another person to whom the duty breached is owed. Like all other torts, the requirements for this are duty, breach of duty by the defendant, causation and injury(Stuhmcke and Corporation.E 2001). However, this form of tort differs from intentional tort as regards the manner the duty is breached. In torts of negligence, duties are breached by negligence and not by intent. Negligence is conduct that falls below the standard of care…
Professor Tom Carter LEGL 210(CU 08) BUSINESS LAW I 11 October 2012 Assignment # 1 Negligence 1. Summary of the facts James Frederick brought a new car 8 months ago. He encountered several issues from the 1st day. The issues involved defective brakes, clutch and transmission. He took the vehicle to the dealer right away, and the dealer tightened the brakes, replaced the clutch (brake pedal) as well as performed additional repairs on the fuel door, trunk door, and transmission. One week later…
slug she shall have a right to claim against the cafe owner. Whether she will bring an action under tort law or contract law ? The cafe owner sells sandwich to the customer. As a food shop he should concern about food because it is relevant to health and ultimately life. It can be said that the owner has a duty of care and finally negligence. The claimant can take an action against him under the tort law. Rules: To make a legal research, it is necessay that what legal rules would be applicable on…
Should Tort Laws be replaced? I believe that Tort Laws shouldn’t be replaced. I am going to tell you three reasons why I believe this. One, people who have suffered injury should be able to seek justice without restrictions. Two, negligence is an unintentional tort that involves careless or reckless action. And three, there is no real proof that the number of lawsuits has risen. People who have suffered injury should be able to seek justice without restrictions. That goal is met by the current…
WIRETIME, Inc., committed any torts? If so, explain. WIRETIME, Inc. committed a written defamation as libel tort. A defamation statement was made when WIRETIME, Inc. placed an ad in a magazine stating that BUGusa, Inc. recording devices were low quality and did not work reliably for more than 1 month. WIRETIME, Inc. attacked BUGusa, Inc. reputation and honesty as a company, by imposing false statements. Scenario: WIRETIME, Inc. (Janet) Has WIRETIME, Inc. committed any torts? If so, explain. In this…
Midterm Essay Tort Law Torts and Defenses FACTS: Teenage Son has borrowed parent’s car one evening. First, he dropped by his girlfriend's house to pick her up but once there met with considerable resistance from her parents. Her father stood menacingly in front of the car as your son started the engine, and your son, not one to be intimidated, yelled out the window that he would run over her father if he did not get out of the way. The father, who doggedly stood his ground until the last…
committed any torts? If so, explain. The question listed above has asked if WIRETIME have committed ant types of torts, this is indeed true. WIRETIME has committed a tort. The type of tort the committed is called Defamation. WIRETIME committed defamation by making false and bashing statements BUGusa, Inc’s products. If these statements are not true BUGusa, Inc’s can take legal action against WIRETIME. Scenario: WIRETIME, Inc. (Janet) Has WIRETIME, Inc. committed any torts? If so, explain…
Contract and Negligence for Business LECTURE SLIDES Duty of care Learning outcome Understand principles of liability in negligence in business activities Aim of the session To review how negligence differs in tort and contract law with emphasis on duty of care TOPIC 7 UNIT 5: Aspects of Contract and Negligence for Business Negligence Negligence is now the most significant tort Whereas other torts protect particular interests (for example, defamation protects people’s reputation), negligence may be…
Chapter 6 Exam Review Tort A Tort is a violation of a duty imposed by the civil law Defamation Defamation involves a defamatory statement that is false, uttered to a third person, and causes an injury. Opinion and privilege are valid defenses Malice Public personalities can win a defamation suit only by proving actual malice False Imprisonment False Imprisonment is the intentional restraint of another person without reasonable cause and without consent Emotional Distress The intentional…