Writing
EN1001M – Introduction to Literary Study
Introduction
Many papers that you write in college will require you to make an argument; this means that you must take a position on the subject you are discussing and support that position with evidence. It’s important that you use the right kind of evidence, that you use it effectively, and that you have an appropriate amount of it.
Comments like “for example?,” “substantiate,” “proof?,” “go deeper,” or “expand” in the margins of your graded paper suggest that you may need more evidence.
Using evidence in an argument
Does evidence speak for itself?
Absolutely not. After you introduce evidence into your writing, you must say why and how this evidence supports your argument. In other words, you have to explain the significance of the evidence and its function in your paper.
Here are some questions you can ask yourself about a particular bit of evidence. Answering them may help you explain how your evidence is related to your overall argument:
1. O.k., I’ve just stated this point, but so what? Why is it interesting? Why should anyone care?
2. What does this information imply?
3. What are the consequences of thinking this way or looking at a problem this way?
4. I’ve just described what something is like or how I see it, but why is it like that?
5. I’ve just said that something happens-so how does it happen? How does it come to be the way it is?
6. Why is this information important? Why does it matter?
7. How is this idea related to my thesis? What connections exist between them? Does it support my thesis? If so, how does it do that?
8. Can I give an example to illustrate this point?
Quotations
When you quote, you are reproducing another writer’s words exactly as they appear on the page. Here are some tips to help you decide when to use quotations:
Writing
1. Quote if you can’t say it any better and the author’s words are particularly brilliant, witty, edgy, distinctive, a good illustration of a point you’re making, or otherwise interesting. 2. Quote if you are using a particularly authoritative source and you need the author’s expertise to back up your point.
3. Quote if you are analyzing diction, tone, or a writer’s use of a specific word or phrase.
4. Quote if you are taking a position that relies on the reader’s understanding exactly what another writer says about the topic.
Be sure to introduce each quotation you use, and always cite your sources.
Like all pieces of evidence, a quotation can’t speak for itself. If you end a paragraph with a quotation, that may be a sign that you have neglected to discuss the importance of the quotation in terms of your argument. It’s important to avoid “plop quotations,” that is, quotations that are just dropped into your paper without any introduction, discussion, or follow-up. Paraphrasing
When you paraphrase, you take a specific section of a text and put it into your own words.
Putting it into your own words doesn’t mean just changing or rearranging a few of the author’s words: to paraphrase well and avoid plagiarism, try setting your source aside and restating the sentence or paragraph you have just read, as though you were describing it to another person. Paraphrasing is different than summary because a paraphrase focuses on a particular, fairly short bit of text (like a phrase, sentence, or paragraph). You’ll need to indicate when you are paraphrasing someone else’s text by citing your source correctly, just as you would with a quotation.
When might you want to paraphrase?
1. Paraphrase when you want to introduce a writer’s position, but his or her original words aren’t special enough to quote.
2. Paraphrase when you are supporting a particular point and need to draw on a certain place in a text that supports your point—for example, when one paragraph in a source is especially relevant.
Writing
3. Paraphrase when you want to present a writer’s view on a topic that
Related Documents: The Importance Of Evidence In Literature
argumentation required proof or evidence Rhetoric: the art of persuasion Aristotle, Rhetoric, 330 BCE Develops from the observation that not all legitimate thinking takes the form of Socratic dialectic Written partly against Socrates’ claim that rhetoric is mere flattery, that only philosophy leads the way to truth Aristotle’s text introduced the basic elements of oratory, many of which we continue to recognize today in modern essay writing (arrangement, style, evidence, expression, audience, purpose)…
ENG122: Composition II An Introduction to Argument English 122: Composition II An Introduction to Argument Argument and Rhetoric An argument can take many forms. It is, at its root, a method for communicating a singular position with evidence, logic, and persuasion. There are essential elements to all valid arguments, though they may take different forms. 1. Claim 2. Evidence 3. Counterargument 4. Rebuttal A successful argument depends upon the delicate balance between these elements. Imagine a…
Romans his slave. Brutus appeals to the people's minds and leaves an impression that Caesar would have become a tyrant. What Brutus terms as his reason is a hypothetical situation and is not reason enough for killing Caesar. He does not provide any evidence to his statement that Caesar was ambitious. Where as Mark Antony uses flawless logic and genuine emotional appeal in his masterful oratory. first of all, Antony enters dramatically to the pulpit with Caesar's body to win the sympathy of the mob…
More refused to submit to both The Act of Supremacy and the Oath of Succession. Sir Thomas More was charged with high treason because of this. Rhetoric is persuasion and the art of logical argument. During the trial Sir Thomas utilizes this principle of rhetoric to make his case against King Henry’s divorce. Sir Thomas More is using this principle of rhetoric when he says, “In good faith, Master Rich, I am sorrier for your perjury than for mine own peril, and you shall understand that neither I nor…
Criticism of President George Bush’s Announcement of Allied Forces’ Air Raid on Iraq Introduction One of the most exciting genres of rhetoric to study is war rhetoric. It is packed with language that excites the senses. It follows a compelling dramatic structure. It features a battle of good versus evil. What follows is a rhetorical criticism of war rhetoric, in particular, Bush’s address to the American people announcing that U.S. armed forces were launching air raids on Iraqi military targets…
2011 terrorist attacks (Krauthammer 2008). Through the rhetoric of political speechwriters, the administration described its agenda as one of “fighting terror,” “spreading democracy,” and “protecting the US’ strategic interests.” According to Dr. Robert Jervis, Columbia University professor of International Affairs and the most cited expert on the subject, the Bush Doctrine is, in fact, far more serious than its rhetoric suggests; it is a doctrine of preventive war, an initiative that…
Conservatives vs Liberals: The Merry-Go-Round of Political Party Rhetoric “Liberals and conservatives are two gangs who have intimidated rational, normal thinking human beings in to not having a voice on television or in the culture. Liberals and conservatives are paradigms that mean nothing to anyone other than the media” --Jon Stewart Today’s society seems to be overrun…
Literatures and Foreign Languages Let Us Learn and Resource Together 23 November 2008 Rhetorical Analysis of “A More Perfect Union” Speech The speech titled “A More Perfect Union” was delivered by Senator Barack Obama on March 18, 2008 near the historical site of the signing of the U.S. Constitution in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The speech responds to the video clip of Barack Obama’s pastor, Reverend Jeremiah Wright, making racially charged comments against America and Israel. The pundits…
that were more significant than the choice of wine was how you drank it. It declared your innermost nature. (56) 6. The symposia were scenes for frisky but opposing discussion in which drinkers would try to outdo each other in humor, poetry, or rhetoric. The ambience of the symposion prompted the Greeks how civilized they were, in comparison with the barbarians. Cultured competition and Greece’s believed dominance over foreigners were evident in the Greek love of wine. (52) 7. What most distinguished…