paper Paul Mees’ main argument is that “low transport density isn’t a barrier to successful public transport, and that it is easier to change public transport provision in a city, than it is to change urban densities (not that increasing urban densities isn’t a worthy goal). Certainly urban density makes it easier to make public transport successful, but I’d agree that it is possible to make public transport work a lot better in low density environments. Indeed, in Melbourne, relatively high quality…
Words 2990 - Pages 12