The Adversary System
1. The adversary system is the main system of trial in Australia where the two parties battle to win the case. There are strict rules of procedure that must be followed and the judge and the jury are impartial arbitrators.
2. In the adversary system each party has control of their own case. This is known as party control, where they get to decide how evidence is presented, providing the rules of evidence and procedure are followed, and they get to prepare their own case and present it.
In the adversary system, parties are responsible for instigating proceedings. In a civil case the plaintiff is responsible for deciding whether to go to court to sue the defender, whereas in a criminal case it’s the prosecution who decides whether to charge the accused. The parties are responsible for investigating the facts of the case (deciding what evidence to presents, witnesses to call and questions to ask) and investigating the law, which may bring forward relevant precedents. In a civil case, the parties also decide whether to have a jury and choose whether they want to have legal representation, and the quality of that legal representation.
Party control ensures that parties are responsible for the outcome of the case, have the responsibility to prepare their case and then both sides fight to win their case. Cases are heard without state interference. However, party control increases the costs involved in taking a matter to court.
3. The role of the Judge ensures that the contest is fair and impartial so that both sides have an equal chance to win. The judge decides on the admissibility of evidence, questions of law and ensures the burden of proof is discharged. The judge decides the case when there is not jury, and sentences the accused in criminal cases. The adversary system could not function of the judge was not independent and impartial. The judge cannot favour one side nor have previous knowledge of the accused or parties in a civil case.
4. The burden and standard of proof are essential elements of the adversary system. They ensure that the person bringing the matter to court has to prove their case to the required standard. In a criminal case the prosecution brings the case, and in a civil case it’s the plaintiff. The standard is the strength of proof required in the case. In criminal cases the prosecution needs to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, and in civil cases the plaintiff needs to prove their case on the balance of probabilities.
Phillips June 26th, 2014 Adversary System The adversary system can best be described as the basis of our system. According to USlegal.com, “ this system is used across the U.S in which the parties to a case develop and present their arguments, gather and submit evidence, call and question witnesses, and, generally control the information presented according to the law and legal process, (Adversarial System Law & Legal Definition).” The basic outline of the system is that each party or side…
effectiveness of the Adversarial system in achieving Justice The adversarial system of trial was developed by the British in 1743 as a system of trial. The adversarial system was adopted by Australia. Australia adopted this system of trial as Britain colonised Australia in the 19th century. Britain brought with it a system of law known as ' common law' ". As the name suggests, the adversarial system in Australia refers to a method of trial, which involves contestants or adversaries, that is, it is an adversarial…
Generator (PKG) provides complete trust at the decryption end. Applications: This scheme finds its greatest use is in the file transfer service. 3.5. Multi-instance Security and Its Application to Password-Based Cryptography Mi-security [18] is used in systems where a single instance can be compromised and a second line of defence is provided, aiming to ensure that the effort to compromise all of some large number m of instances grows linearly with m. Advantages: Mi security is potentially much higher than…
The habits of exercising security and accountability of a soldiers items allow the soldier and their team to operate to the highest standards or have items be accessed by an opposing adversary creating loss of overall mission success. Operational security is a process that denied critical information to an adversary. If one were to obtain the information presented it could be used against friendly…
American Court System Eva McGill CJA /224 5/21/13 Danielle Diaz The United States courts and history and its purpose has been a strong order of justice in the nation since the first time it was established. The system was designed to allow the citizens of the United States to receive a fair criminal trial regardless of social status, gender, race, and ethnic background. The Court .A court is an institution that the government sets up to settle disputes through a legal process. Courts decide…
PRESENTATION NAME Re-cap from last week Sources of law Alternative methods to courts • Alternative methods of dispute settlement have grown in the last few years because of the delays, costs, ignorance and intimidation of the traditional court system. – These include • tribunals; • ombudsmen; and • alternative dispute resolution. Alternative methods to courts Alternative methods to courts Judicial and quasi-judicial tribunals – Designed to provide cheap, quick and fair dispute resolution…
(1120). The importance of vengeance and envy describe not only the characters themselves in the sources, but also symbolizes the attitudes and beliefs of the society as well, which all lead to the social changes brought on by a more effective fief system and an intellectual revolution after the wake of the crusades. The main thematic focus of Raoul of Cambrai deals with vengeance. The idea of vengeance shapes Raoul's actions first by forcing him to burn the city of Origny which then lead to him…
The British origins of common law The common-law system first developed in England and is therefore often referred to as ‘English common law’. Upon colonisation by the British, Australia adopted a common-law legal system. Other countries using this system include Great Britain, Canada, New Zealand and the United States of America. Common law can be best described as a collection of legal principles and rules that is derived from the decisions of judges in higher courts. However, the term ‘common…
PART B The Adversarial System is a legal system used in the common law countries. In this system, a case is argued by two opposing sides that have the main responsibility for finding and presenting facts. The prosecutor tries to prove that the defendant is guilty, and the defendant’s lawyer argues for freeing the defendant. A judge or a jury who does not investigate any further then decides if the defendant is guilty or not. Both parties have the equal opportunity to present their opinion. The…
help of technology companies, The Guardian The New York Times and ProPublica reported Thursday. The NSA has also maintained control over international encryption standards. As the Times points out, encryption "guards global commerce and banking systems, protects sensitive data like trade secrets and medical records, and automatically secures the e-mails, Web searches, Internet chats and phone calls of Americans and others around the world." The American Civil Liberties Union, which has filed a…