behind the punis hm ent. However, Nietzs che argues , thes e things have had different m eanings at different tim es . For ins tance, the act of punis hm ent has been at tim es a celebration of one's power, at tim es an act of cruelty, at tim es a s im ple tit-for-tat. We cannot unders tand a thing, and we certainly cannot unders tand its origin, if we as s um e that it has always held the s am e m eaning. Central to Nietzs che's critique, then, is an attem pt at genealogy that will s how the winding…
Words 1016 - Pages 5