The public interest must be considered in each case where there is enough evidence to provide a realistic prospect of conviction. Although there may be public interest factors against prosecution in a particular case, often the prosecution should go ahead and those factors should be put to the court for consideration when sentence is being passed. A prosecution will usually take place unless there are public interest factors tending against prosecution which clearly outweigh those tending in favour, or it appears more appropriate in all the circumstances of the case to divert the person from prosecution (see section 5.8).
5.8 Crown Prosecutors must balance factors for and against prosecution carefully and fairly. Public interest factors that can affect the decision to prosecute usually depend on the seriousness of the offence or the circumstances of the suspect. Some factors may increase the need to prosecute but others may suggest that another course of action would be better.
a) the court is likely to impose a nominal penalty;
(b) the defendant has already been made the subject of a sentence and any further conviction would be unlikely to result in the imposition of an additional sentence or order, unless the nature of the particular offence requires a prosecution or the defendant withdraws consent to have an offence taken into consideration during sentencing;
(c) the offence was committed as a result of a genuine mistake or misunderstanding (these factors must be balanced against the seriousness of the offence);
(d) the loss or harm can be described as minor and was the result of a single incident, particularly if it was caused by a misjudgement;
(e) there has been a long delay between the offence taking place and the date of the trial, unless:-
• the offence is serious;
• the delay has been caused in part by the defendant;
• the offence has only recently come to light; or
• the complexity of the offence has meant that there has been a long investigation;
(f) a prosecution is likely to have a very bad effect on the victim's physical or mental health, always bearing in mind the seriousness of the offence;
(g the defendant is elderly or is, or was at the time of the offence, suffering from significant mental or physical ill health, unless the offence is serious or there is a real possibility that it may be repeated. The Crown Prosecution Service, where necessary, applies Home Office guidelines about how to deal with mentally disordered offenders. Crown Prosecutors must balance the desirability of diverting a defendant who is suffering from significant mental or physical ill health with the need to safeguard the general public;
(h) the defendant has put right the loss or harm that was caused (but defendants must not avoid prosecution solely because they pay compensation); or
(i) details may be made public that could harm sources of information, international relations or national security.
5.11 Deciding on the public interest is not simply a matter of adding up the number of factors on each side. Crown Prosecutors must decide how important each factor is in the circumstances of each case and go on to make an overall assessment.
5.12 The Crown Prosecution Service does not act for victims or the families of victims in the same way as solicitors act for their clients. Crown Prosecutors act on behalf of the public and not just in the interests of any particular individual. However, when considering the public interest, Crown Prosecutors should always take into account the consequences for the victim of whether or not to prosecute, and any views expressed by the victim or the victim's family.
5.13 It is important that a victim is told about a decision which makes a significant difference to the case in which they are involved. Crown Prosecutors
Related Documents: Essay on public interest factors for the prosecution
are failing to comply with the law. Where appropriate, officers may also serve enforcement notices, injunctions, withdraw approvals, vary licence conditions or exemptions, issue formal cautions and fixed penalties. Simple cautions and prosecution are important ways to bring duty holders to account for alleged breaches of the law. Where it is appropriate to do so in accordance with this policy, the council should use one of these measures in addition to other enforcement action.…
care, skill or foresight that a reasonable person would have exercised in the same circumstances. c) Strict liability offences. Strict Liability: offences are minor in nature e.g. speeding. For these offences it is not necessary for the prosecution to prove mens rea; proof of the act alone is suitable to constitute a crime. d) Causation. The act or omission committed must have caused the specific injury complained of. The principles of causation mainly apply to murder and manslaughter…
persuade the courts that a reverse burden is necessary is heavy, the courts continue to uphold such provisions. In Sheldrake their Lordships also concluded that when conducting an assessment of proportionality, it was necessary to balance society’s interest in the effective suppression of a social…
that the accused did in fact carry out the crime, or the Relevant act required for the crime. The prosecutor can prove actus Reus by providing physical evidence and Witness testimonies. This element is often easiest element for the prosecution to prove. The actus Reus has to Be a voluntary act or failure to act, which can include cases of negligence (meaning that the accused failed to To take action when they had the duty to do so). MENS REA: the prosecutor…
possession, use. Driving Offences – includes speeding, drink driving and negligent driving. Public Order Offences – acts that are deemed to disturb the public order for e.g. offensive conduct, obstructing traffic, affray and bomb hoaxes. Preliminary Offences – offences that precede the commission of a crime (attempts, conspiracy). Regulatory Offences – includes breach of water restrictions or public transport rules. Summary Offences – less severe and heard in the Local Court by a magistrate…
imposition of standards on law enforcement officials. Several laws detaii how the police should conduct themselves in regard to criminal law matters. Three such laws are, (l) ln a criminal proceeding,the couft is not ro find the case of the prosecution proved unless it is satisfied that it has been proved beyond reasonable doubt. (2) ln a criminal proceeding, rhe courr is to find the case of a defendant proved if it is satisfied that the case has been proved on the balance of probabilities…
Core 1: crime 1.1 the nature of crime Crime: an act or omission (failure to act) which is injurious to the public which is punishable by law, the state and judicial proceedings Characteristics of crime: Must be an omission which breaks law Act or omission which is harmful to the community as a whole Act or omission which is punishable by state offence must be proved according to criminal procedure Criminal law found in both statute and common law Most criminal offences are in state…
inferences from the witness. Circumstantial evidence is evidence which, even if believed, does not resolve the matter at issue unless additional reasoning is used to reach the proposition to which the evidence is directed. For example, consider the prosecution of D for strangling V. W, a policeman, testifies that shortly after hearing V’s screams, he saw D running from the scene of the crime, and, after stopping D, found a stocking in D’s pocket. While this testimony is direct evidence on the issues…
assignment is to critically examine the position of the victim and to establish how affective the criminal justice system is in England and wales is in delivering justice for victims of crime. The researcher will look at the role of governmental interests in founding victim focused policies and the route of their engagement, at the centre of the criminal justice system. In order to determine if the position of the victim is at the heart of the criminal justice system the researcher will discuss the…