Antonio Gentile
November 4, 2013
Philosophy of Religion
Big Paper
Kretzmann
Kretzmann discusses the relationship between God and morality. He explains and defends the idea that God is the basis of morality. While doing this, he also sides against an old objection raised by Plato in “Euthyphro”. Kretzmann also supports the idea that God is a perfect being who is absolutely simple in order to back up his original claim that God is in fact the basis of morality, which again, relies on the assumption that God is absolutely simple. He uses two simple views of the relationship between God and morality to accurately and descriptively demonstrate his view more carefully. He also explains how bold simplicity is fitting with religious morality. I disagree with Kretzmann when he discusses how bold simplicity works with God’s attributes because of the flaws that follow.
Kretzmann explains that either God says an action is wrong simply because it is wrong and says that an action is right simply because it is right, or that an action is wrong because God says that it is wrong and an action is right simply because he says it is right. It is with these examples that Kretzmann explains that God is either the moral creator or the moral messenger. If God is the messenger, then He has no connection with morality and He simply has told us what is right and what is wrong. This is similar to the story of Moses delivering the Ten Commandments that came from God. Moses did not himself create the Ten Commandments; he was simply the messenger from God to his people. If God is the creator of rightness and goodness, then He has absolutely everything to do with our morals. Kretzmann believes that perfect goodness has to be an attribute of an absolutely perfect being. In the idea of simplicity, God is considered an absolutely perfect being of perfect goodness itself. Because of this, if there is goodness itself and there is an absolutely perfect being, then it must be the only standard of being morally right and wrong. He explains that bold simplicity forces us to say that where there is goodness there is power. Which does not make sense because it would be a false claim to say wherever there is power there is goodness. Instead, Kretzmann adds the word ‘perfect’ to make the statement ‘perfect goodness is identical with perfect power’.
Kretzmann has numerous accurate arguments but is only somewhat persuasive. When he leaves his argument, he mentions that it is still not entirely paradox free. He helps break apart bold simplicity and makes it much more simple but it he does not completely solidify his argument. However, by simply adding ‘perfect’ to the claim “where there is perfect power there is perfect goodness”, you now have as more convincing argument. So, it appears as though we should say that an absolutely perfect being is only as perfect as it is possible for anything to be. Kretzmann’s argument works because at the least he is helping to make the previous argument stronger even though it is not perfect in terms of being paradox free.
Kretzmann mentions an attribute that is difficult to understand. This attribute, simplicity, lets us say that an absolutely perfect being is absolutely simple. If God is absolutely simple then we should say that God ordinarily does not have any parts or that God cannot be distinguishable from any of his attributes. So, God is equal to all of his parts. But, does it make sense to say that God is equal to all of his attributes? We now have a subject, being God, and a quality, or attribute, equaling each other. Let us assume there is a red
Related Documents: Essay on Philosophy: Morality and God
to help to explain why there was a shift from the traditional theological philosophy to the philosophy of religion. The ideas that Westphal expresses within his paper about the emergence of the modern philosophy of religion have to agree with, such as his idea of the Kernel and the Husk. On the other hand some of the key thinkers that Westphal uses, within his paper to show their contribution to the emergence of philosophy of religion, I do not agree with all their ideas. I shall examine the thoughts…
Research Paper “PHILOSOPHY AND LIFE IS WHAT YOU MAKE OF IT” PHILOSOPHY 1381 UIW December 9, 2007 Abstract Wow, we’re finally at the end of our exploration into the world of philosophy. It been quite a long road for me but I made it through it all. Exploring this world that I had little knowledge of has broadened my horizon in the subject of philosophy. As we began we asked our selves “What is Philosophy? Philosophy is knowledge which is desirable in itself of those truths which can…
God The mere claim, that there could be “Proof for the Existence of God,” seems to invite ridicule. As far as the ideal, that the Earth might be round. Not always are those who laugh first and think later right. Many well-known scientists now admit that certain discoveries tend to indicate that God rather does exist than not. However, if I picture God as being everywhere, surrounding us like air or awareness then, an understanding of what God is suddenly becomes real. Simply by looking at what…
What is the relationship between religion and morality? It is in my opinion that religion is dependant on morality and not the other way around. Through this, it can be stated that morality reinforces the development and evolution of religion. In this essay, I shall show that this is the case drawing from theories proposed by Plato, Kant and Berg. According to Jonathan Berg, “…a way to construe ethics as depending on religion would be on the basis of a ‘Divine Command Theory’ of ethics, identifying…
God's fiat, then for God Himself there is no difference between right and wrong, and it is no longer a significant statement to say that God is good. If you are going to say, as theologians do, that God is good, you must then say that right and wrong have some meaning which is independent of God's fiat, because God's fiats are good and not good independently of the mere fact that he made them. If you are going to say that, you will then have to say that it is not only through God that right and wrong…
Philosophy Exam Review Definitions: Philosophy- Thinking about thinking or the love of wisdom Normative- In aesthetics, a term to refers to an approach to defining art. A normative definition involves defining art according to specific standards, or norms. Values- Induction (Inductive reasoning) – A reasoning process that involves drawing a general conclusion from specific observations. Logical Consistency- In logic, refers to statements that do not contradict each other Rehabilitations-…
Does God Exist? Introduction Philosophy is the study of and the attempt to answer, the fundamental questions pertaining to nature, morality, and conduct. It is divided into various disciplines including logic, metaphysics, epistemology, ethics, aesthetics, and social and political philosophy. Metaphysics, or the “first philosophy,” investigates questions that lie at the core of many other areas of inquiry. One of the most controversial questions in metaphysics is the question…
Religion or Science Philosopher and historian David Hume was considered as a deist, aside from being an empiricist and someone who usually supported the theory of evolution. Even if Hume believed that God created the universe, he did not think that God was further involved in anything beyond creation. This was especially true in how he formulated his moral theory wherein he claimed that man was inherently inclined to do good because it was beneficial to him. As a result of…
population gain their sense of morality from their religion. The tendency for religious leaders to be perceived as speakers for morality is something that is seen worldwide. Anywhere there is religion, there are religious leaders; and although there isn't a biological difference between the leaders and followers of any religion that would make the leaders superior, they are still often "regarded as having special moral insight" (Rachels, 2003). In chapter 4 of The Elements of Morality (4th ed), James Rachels…
Arguing the Existence of God What is God? Where did God come from? While I am sure no one can know, without a trace of doubt, of how what we know as God came to be; I can, at the very least, examine what knowledge we've collectively gathered of the history of the human race and make assumptions based upon my own sense of logic. Now to begin, we shall start at the first sculpture of a “god”, the Aurignacian Lionman of the Hohlenstein Stadel, which is the oldest known zoomorphic sculpture in the world…