Love Does not Exist
INTRODUCTION:
Love holds a universal meaning because everyone has felt its affect in life, whether its by a spouse, for their children or even for themselves. But the question is, is the concept of love truly real? Does it signify something authentic in the human experience? I am arguing that it does not. argument one: “The Concept of Love is Superficial”
When you’re with your boyfriend/girlfriend/wife, significant other, you want to kiss them, or hold them right? And when you’re with your mom or dad or sister you want to give them a hug? . Humans commonly refer to love as filling a space in your heart, feeling adored and wanting to love another, But scientifically, love is not even an emotion. Love in our society is just a superficial concept that is learned from social conditioning. In religion, we’re told to love and praise god, in books at school, or on TV, we are told about mommy and daddy, loving each Because humans do not know of any other possibilities, and are not interested in considering contradictions, this leads to the mistaken belief of love which is passed on from one person to another person. As Pierce said in his passage “The Fixation of Belief” it is far easier to live ignorantly in belief, then to doubt and questions a propositions contradiction. Another cause which affects human’s beliefs comes from the Article “Your Brain lies to you” by the New York Times which says that when a belief sounds emotionally selective, you chose to believe it. So naturally, we become deceived into thinking love exists, when really it’s just a natural affection. Here’s an example of when this superficial love concept applies to you in modern day. Let’s say you’ve been dating someone for two months. Someone might ask you; do you love him/her? You might even ask yourself, do I love him? You’re unsure, because you don’t know what love is, because this love thing doesn’t really exist. You might even decide YES I love him, because I like being around him, he gives me butterflies, he makes me smile, I think he’s cute etc, the way your acting with him really checks off a lot of the signs of “love. But really, you’re just showing your natural affections for someone. And besides, even if it were to exist, following a solipsist perspective, how could we even know what love is compared to one another. What I see as love could be perceived as hatred to you.
ARGUMENT 2: “Loves inherent “Unconditionality” is strictly false.”
A lot of the time, people who are into the concept of love, claim that love is being unconditional. They’ll often say things like love knows no bounds, and does not insist on conditions around it. For example, for richer or poorer, sickness and in health, you know the typical wedding spiel before that man and wife vow before they kiss! This is such a false statement, because theoretically if this concept of love existed, there are endless conditions associated with it, making this statement completely illogical. It basically implies that we are like slaves of love, with no way out.. For example, let’s say we have a married couple, for 25 years, or a couple graduating high school who “LOVE” each other so deeply!!. And they end up breaking up saying things like love you, but I can’t do this anymore. Or I love you, but you’re holding me back, I have to go to this school 2000 miles away and chase my dreams etc. Uhmm hello, does this not contradict everything that love stands for? If you love someone unconditionally, and you decide that with your significant other, there are no ifs ands or butts. You can’t love someone unconditionally, and then end the romance. That breaks Aristotle’s law of non-contradiction. Therefore,
research the history of a few new tendencies in contemporary philosophy. Then I will discuss the Tom Rockmore interpretation of such tendencies. Tom Rockmore is Professor of Philosophy and a McAnulty College Distinguished Professor, Dr. Rockmore's current research interests encompass all of modern philosophy, with special emphasis on selected problems as well as figures in German idealism (Kant, Fichte, Hegel, Marx) and recent continental philosophy (Heidegger, Habermas, Lukacs). He is continuing to explore…
alongside my Associates Degree in General Studies at Johnson County Community College. Value/Meaning According to the official curriculum laid out by the school the subjects that fill this area is Art, Ethics, Foreign Language, Dance, Literature, Philosophy, Culture and Religion studies. The…
A Look at Human Nature & Confucianism vs. Legalism All of the Chinese philosophies and religions have had core assumptions about the human nature that helped shape their policies and way of influence. The ancient Chinese were deep philosophical thinkers that would debate ideas to further their understanding of themselves and the world around them. This invited a culture of learning and education. Therefore many Chinese philosophies and religions emphasized education as an intrical and important part of society…
gasses increase climate • There are legitmate debates for climate change, there are ones who think there are a large change in sea level because of ice sheets, while others think there wont be a change. • Political side, there are debates on such nuclear energy or should we put emphasis on solar, that would be a good debate, not extreme views • Hurricanes-should go up as the climate goes up they debate rather they see changes historically it’s a great debate • Interviewed by a journalist that wasn’t…
My Philosophy. For me, arriving at my philosophy has been a really hard and soul searching task. The Collins English dictionary describes the word philosophy as any “system of beliefs, values or tenets” (Davidson, 2009, p123) but, what do I really think is important? What values do I want to support, instil and nurture (Stonehouse, 1991) in the children that I teach? I have spent the past couple of days searching through my textbooks for anything remotely related to the word philosophy, scanning…
A DEBATE OVER UTILITARIANISM In the elements of moral philosophy By J. Rachels Presented by – Nida Naqvi UTILITARIAN APPROACH TO ETHICS Jeremy Bentham’s motto “the greatest good for the greatest number” A legal reformer who lived during the 18th and the 19th centuries Objective – provide publicly acceptable norm for determining what kind of laws England should enact. Example Theft analysis John Stuart Mill (1806 – 1873) “ The Utilitarian doctrine is that happiness is desirable…
Philosophy 109 Dualism Over Materialism As we look at the mind body problem or the debate of whether or not humans contain a mind separate from a body, we find that there are two major views. There is the materialist view, and there is also the dualist view. Although, there has been no empirical evidence of the mind, does not mean it does not exist, but that our sciences are not yet advanced enough to find the evidence? We must not be intolerant to the fact that all advances in human nature…
suggested approach Philosophy of Religion Ethics Row 1 The Design Argument The Cosmological Argument Religion and Morality Utilitarianism Situation Ethics Row 2 The problem of evil Miracles Sexual ethics War and peace 1. On the unit 1 exam, you will answer 3 essay questions. Either 2 philosophy and 1 ethics, or 2 ethics and 1 philosophy (you choose) in 1 hour and 45 minutes. Each 2 part question takes 35 minutes to answer. 2. You need to prepare 5 topics: either 3 philosophy and 2 ethics, or 3…
tendency to teach logic as a means of achieving self-centered ends. It was the truth he loved and believed in. He said he did not teach, but rather he served and engaged his students. Socrates had a willingness to question and he studied “the art of debate and became a master at cross-examination and irony”. He used these techniques because he believed people should be aware of and gain the knowledge by exposing ignorance and mistaken reasoning. Always beginning with questions helped him in knowing…
PHI 2-355 Philosophy of Religion White 2014/15 202 Prall House Phone: ext. 4239 Home: 319-551-9967 E-Mail: JWHITE Class Time: M-F 12:00-3:00 Office Hours: M, W, F 11-12 Th 3:00-3:30 Required Books: Michael Palmer (ed.), Philosophy of Religion (Fortress, 2011). Lots of other material on Moodle Course Requirements: (1) Daily readings, attendance, class engagement (15%) (2) Two papers each of about 5 pages in length (40%), or one paper and dictionary (3) 3 short-answer quizzes (20%) (4)…