Recommendation Peer Editing
Peer Editor: xxx
Writer: xxx
Content
Yes
No
Appropriate title

Introduction
Purpose: Describes report purpose

Problem: Reviews background or history of problem

Describes problem

Identifies what in general needs to be done

Explains what happens if problem is addressed

Explain what happens if problem is left unaddressed

Problem sections read smoothly

Scope: Describes specific solution

Identifies what report will cover and why

Identifies what report will not cover and why

Discussion
#1 Explanation: Definition: Qualifier (if needed) + Name + Class + Differentiation

Criterion is specific and focuses on only one area

Explains why criterion was chosen

Identifies criterion weighting

Explains why criterion weighted so

Data: Reports findings without comparing

Interpretation: States reason why each model is/isn’t preferred

Identifies preferred solution

#2 Explanation: Definition: Qualifier (if needed) + Name + Class + Differentiation

Criterion is specific and focuses on only one area

Explains why criterion was chosen

Identifies criterion weighting

Explains why criterion weighted so

Data: Reports findings without comparing

Interpretation: States reason why each model is/isn’t preferred

Identifies preferred solution

#3 Explanation: Definition: Qualifier (if needed) + Name + Class + Differentiation

Criterion is specific and focuses on only one area

Explains why criterion was chosen

Identifies criterion weighting

Explains why criterion weighted so

Data: Reports findings without comparing

Interpretation: States reason why each model is/isn’t preferred

Identifies preferred solution

Conclusion
Summary: Provides concise, objective abstract of report/findings

Includes a Table

Conclusions
Explains why some preferences are more or less important than others

Reader gets a clear sense of which