This article was downloaded by: [Trent University]
On: 10 October 2013, At: 13:25
Publisher: Routledge
Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK
Western Journal of Communication
Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rwjc20 Criticism is as Criticism Does
Raymie E. McKerrow
a
a
School of Communication Studies , Ohio University
Published online: 25 Aug 2013.
To cite this article: Raymie E. McKerrow (2013) Criticism is as Criticism Does, Western Journal of
Communication, 77:5, 546-549, DOI: 10.1080/10570314.2013.799284
To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2013.799284
PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE
Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the
“Content”) contained in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising out of the use of the Content.
This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. Terms &
Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/page/termsand-conditions
Western Journal of Communication
Vol. 77, No. 5, October–December 2013, pp. 546–549
Criticism is as Criticism Does
Downloaded by [Trent University] at 13:25 10 October 2013
Raymie E. McKerrow
While there are numerous approaches to criticism, this essay takes the position that each is worthy of being considered in relation to the question or problem being addressed. That means, in practice, that whether or not the essay contributes to theory development will depend on the purpose underlying the critical act.
Keywords: Critical Scholarship; Gatekeeping; Purpose; Theory
The title is a play on a more commonly known phrase, popularized in the movie,
Forrest Gump. That phrase, ‘stupid is as stupid does,’ implies that a ‘‘person who does stupid things is still stupid. You are what you do’’ (Urban Dictionary). Likewise, criticism ‘‘is what it does’’—it really can’t be other than what is done through the act of being critical, whether the object or target is another person, an idea, an event, or any other artifact. This does not mean that the critical act is flawless, and always acceptable. Criticism may be offered at inappropriate times, it may be an unintentional (or intentional) misunderstanding of the event or idea being targeted, or it may simply be weak or even deluded. It may reflect poorly or well on the person engaging in the critical act, or on the target, or both. The practice of academic criticism follows the same orientation as that engaged in interpersonal interactions. That is, it too is defined by what it does—either well or ill. A key difference, separating the interpersonal interaction from the act of writing a critical essay, is that convention dictates specific styles or approaches that have been deemed appropriate and useful in engaging discursive events. Whether marked as primarily Ideological, Narrative,