Explain and Illustrate the idea that morality is a conventional agreement for our own advantage and one problem with this.
Do you often ask yourself, ‘why am I behaving in this civil way, when I could be gaining a lot more by behaving in a different way?’ Some claim that we are born with morals, and that it is a priori knowledge, however other philosophers argue that morality is in fact an agreement between humans.
The idea that morality is a convential agreement for our own advantage is a very interesting theory. Many believe that we are all egoists, which means we act in order to maximise our own self-interest rather than the interest of others. However, some believe that we are ‘enlightened egoists’ which is a person who realises that there are consequences to their actions. They have desires and interests but often choose not to act on them because they realise that by doing so, they could lose the things they really value. This ‘egoism’ idea then leads to Social Contract Theories. This is because man is essentially self-interested, we must all behave morally in order to maximise and gain plus’ in our lives, than acting irresponsibly and loosing things. The idea of a social contract between humans started with Glaucon, who believed that morality is a social construction, whose source is the desire to maintain ones reputation for virtue and honesty; when that sanction is removed, moral character would disappear. Hobbes agreed, and stated that we as humans live in a society with rules because we are concerned for our own safety. Yet again, self-interested – any concern for others simply hides a concern for ourselves. Contracts simply secure some happiness or self –gain but as a result, some compromises of personal freedom will have to be made.
A way of illustrating the theory that morality is a conventional agreement is to look at Thomas Hobbes’ idea of ‘the state of nature’. He believes this is what we are constantly trying to escape and what we would decline into, if we weren’t to have social contracts. This ‘State of Nature’ is described as a ‘war of all against all’ and that ‘the life of a man would be solitary, poor, nasty, brutish and short’. This is because resources are scarce; there is a fear of death, along with no rules or laws. An example of why people in the state of nature would create a social contract is this:
There is a man with limited resources, however he acquires a pig. When he goes for a nap, his next door neighbour takes the pig. This is because he is self-interested and wants the pig for himself. However, both of them realise that when he goes to sleep, the original owner
Related Documents: Morality and Social Contract Essay
changes over time people’s views and beliefs conform to what the “now” is of society. In my opinion morality comes from our ever changing society. Morality is considered the right and wrong in ones’ way of life. In our book, The Right Thing to Do, morality and social conventions go hand in hand. Social conventions are societies accepted and expected behaviors; which ties right into what morality is, the right and wrong of society. Each person has his/her own belief of what is right and wrong…
exchange for peace and the arbitration of disputes. Morality, then, emerges from enlightened self-interest. Ethics essentially consist of some agreed-to prohibitions against force and fraud, i.e., some agreed-to constraints on unbridled self-interest, which are backed up with government force (e.g., police, soldiers) and reinforced by culture (e.g., school, church). Contemporary philosopher Antony Flew: “A general explanation of morality and [self-]interest might be stated thus: all our benefits…
understandings or “contracts” that bind industries, companies, and economic systems into moral communities. It is in these economic communities, and in the often unspoken understandings that provide their ethical glue, that we believe many of the answers to business ethics quandaries lie. Further, we think that answering such questions requires the use of a yet deeper, and universal “contract” superseding even individual ones. The theory that combines both these deeper and thinner kinds of contracts we label…
Navigating through Ethics to Find my Morality Deron M. Medley Walden University Untitled As I reflect on what I’ve learned regarding moral theories of ethics, how do I apply it to my everyday life? What I’ve learned about the nature of morality, “as human beings living in the world we have basic duties and obligations” (Thiroux and Krasemann, 2009, p. 1). I come to realize that it is my responsibility to use the freedom I possess carefully and to understand…
Tuan Nguyen Hw9 1. Justice is the first virtue of social institutions, as truth is of systems of though. 2. The social contract is an intellectual device intended to explain the appropriate relationship between individuals and their governments. Social contract arguments assert that individuals unite into political societies by a process of mutual consent, agreeing to abide by common rules and accept corresponding duties to protect themselves and one another from violence and other kinds of harm…
In order for exchange to occur: a/ a compjex societal system must be involved ~ organized marketing activities must also take place jU a profit-oriented organization must be involved in the process 4/ money or other legal tender is required e. each party must have something the other party considers to be valuable Toyota found that consumers wanted cars to Iast Ionger and be more eiivironmentally friendly. GM, however. enjoyed being the top U.S. car producer, and focused more on…
Life Thesis: Many facets of Oscar Wilde’s life are portrayed in the “Importance of being Earnest” including his creative personality, his struggle to fit in society, and his views on marriage. I. Oscar Wilde uses irony to creatively mock the fake morality of the Victorian society. a. From looking at the life of Oscar Wilde it is obvious that he was very creative. i. Wilde wrote all kinds of literature. ii. Wilde’s way of thinking differed from many others. b. The title “The importance of being Earnest”…
conclusion social contractarians draw from the dilemma is that we are better off if we cooperate, adopting an (enforced) agreement or social contract, than we would be if we acted as “independent egoists” (in other words, as people who pursue their own interests without cooperation or agreement). The prisoner’s dilemma is a very artificial situation, of course; but there are many real situations that are similar in the sense that independent egoism will produce worse results than accepting a social contract…
human capabilities. Eudaimonia for a human being is the reaching of excellence in reason. Aristotle makes the claim that by nature man is blind to morality implying that man is naturally amoral, this is supported when he says that man is born without knowledge hence morality cannot be part of human nature as man has yet to acquire knowledge of morality. Another point Aristotle makes is that we are all slaves by nature. There are those who will rise above the rest of the peoples. Aristotle seems to…
the Issue of Gay Marriage Gay Marriage is a complex issue in regards to why one would or would not support it. If we take the issue outside of morality you still have legal and financial implications to deal with. However, if that was the only barrier, then I would be for Gay marriage. I don’t see any reason why we would let something like social security benefits, or insurance stand in the way of something harmless, especially if we are celebrating love. The issue of Gay marriage is not,…