Moody’s changed their business model and took advantage of the public, and investors; basically everyone involved. They became complacent of their reputation and no longer work towards the best interest of their clients. As a former Moody’s executive put it “things became a lot more bottom line driven (Lawrence & Weber, p.456).
The stakeholders that benefited through Moody’s actions were top executives, managers, investors, and some bank employees that were rewarded after they’ve succumbed to the pressure of giving loans to unqualified borrowers. Those that were affected by moody’s selfish acts were the homeowners who were giving loans without qualifications, those that were misinformed or not well informed. It’s hard to say the banks were affected by Moody’s actions because I believe knew potential of those risks and benefited from them for a while. Therefore, we can’t necessarily say the banks were affected.
I believe Moody’s had conflict of interest because, the company pressured sales agents, lenders and bank employees to produce more loans at any cost to fill the appetite of its investors as mention in the book (p.460). Everyone’s concern was about how much profit they bring in to the company instead of the financial well being of borrowers. In order to reduce this conflict, less pressure needs to be put on agents to close a large number of mortgages (Lawrence & Weber, 2011). With the increased pressure from individuals that are higher up, these agents were closing mortgages for individuals that were not qualified. By reducing the number of sub-prime mortgages that are issued, a situation like this can be avoided in the future. Another thing that may be beneficial is to issue more fixed-rate mortgages. With fixed rate mortgages, homeowners can get into the routine of paying a set amount for the loan period and not have to worry about their mortgages going up after the first three or four years like with variable rate mortgages.
Moody’s and its executives bare a greater responsibility for the financial crisis when compared with the others involved. The Residential Mortgage Back Security (RMBS) model Moody’s used was flawed. Instead of improving the system, this model contributed to the demise of the housing market. Moody’s was using this model to attract investors at unsafe costs (Lawrence & Weber, 2011). The investors were unaware of how risky their investment actually was. They based their investment on the RMBS amount that Moody’s provided (Lawrence & Weber, 2011). If Moody’s disclosed more data to its investors, these investors would not have made their investment into such a venture. While investors were making a blind investment,
Related Documents: Conflict Of Interest In Moody's Case
Moody’s Credit Ratings and the Subprime Mortgage Meltdown Table of Contents Introduction……………………………………………….3 Background………………………………………………..4-10 Analysis……………………………………………………10-12 Conclusion…………………………………………………12-13 References………………………………………………….14 In the early-2000s, Moody’s, one of the leading credit rating agencies in the world, evaluated thousands of bonds backed by so-called “subprime” residential mortgages—home loans made to those with both low incomes and poor credit scores…
CREDIT RATINGS Credit Rating A credit rating is Standard & Poor’s opinion of the general creditworthiness of an obligor, or the creditworthiness of an obligor with respect to a particular debt security or other financial obligation, based on relevant risk factors. A rating does not constitute a recommendation to purchase, sell, or hold a particular security. In addition, a rating does not comment on the suitability of an investment for a particular investor. The Big Three The Big Three By…
Demand for credit analysis • The likelihood of financial distress is an important aspect of firm risk. • Numerous parties are interested in the creditworthiness of a company, including banks, investors, suppliers, auditors, and employees, among others. • Debt is an important source of financing, though there are trade‐offs in financing with debt instead of equity capital. Market for credit: Suppliers • Commercial banks – Universal banking • Other financial institutions – Insurance companies…
decrease in automotive production.[46] The Turkish Stock Market and credit rating agencies have responded positively. According to The Economist, share prices in Turkey nearly doubled over the course of 2009.[47] On 8 January 2010, International credit rating agency Moody's upgraded Turkey's rating one notch.[48] In 2012, Fitch upgraded Turkey's credit rating to investment grade (long-term foreign currency Issuer Default Rating (IDR) was upgraded to BBB- (from BB+) and long-term local currency IDR…
especially in foreign exchange markets and stock markets. The main purposes of our essay can be summarized as follows. First of all, we briefly review the background of the sovereign debt crisis. Secondly, we state the spillover effect of sovereign credit signals in financial markets. At the next part we emphasis on the impact of sovereign debt crisis on foreign exchange market and stock market particularly. Description of sovereign debt crisis After the bankrupt of Lehman Brothers in September…
for the Department of Homeland Security and public 911 services. Financial Condition Northrop Grumman is a financially secure company that is looking to maintain its current status quo. According to their Value Line Report they were given an A++ rating for financial stability. Value Line is also estimating their 2012 revenues at $25100 million, which represents a decrease of $1312 million. Even though the company’s revenues have decreased since 2010, they have been able to maintain their strength…
whether power like this should be in the hands of many or in the hands of the few. Recently according to Yahoo finance the city of Chicago has been ordered to pay back $2.2 billion back to the bank after one financial service (Moody’s Investors Service) dropped their credit rating to “junk”. In fact it was ranked to Ba1 which is one step below investment grade. Apparently somewhere in the contracts that the city of Chicago signed there was a contingency that stated if the city falls below a certain…
finance to repackage risks and create “safe” assets from otherwise risky collateral led to a dramatic expansion in the issuance of structured securities, most of which were viewed by investors to be virtually risk-free and certified as such by the rating agencies. At the core of the recent financial market crisis has been the discovery that these securities are actually far riskier than originally advertised. We examine how the process of securitization allowed trillions of dollars of risky assets…
Based on the business model that First American Bank’s (FAB) Credit Derivatives business unit follows, it should go ahead and take credit exposure to CapEx Unlimited (CEU). Pros of undertaking such an exposure include a periodic fee payment from Charles Bank International (CBI) to FBI in exchange for credit protection. The amount of periodic fee charged to CEU should reflect adequately reflect the inherent credit risk that FAB is exposed to. Additionally, FBI will be able to strengthen its customer…
significantly over the last several years. (Increase of 86% since ’06) ONEOK’s solid positive free cash flow and expected 14 – 18% increase of EBITDA through 2013 lead us to extrapolate the financial position of ONEOK is fairly strong. ONEOK’s credit rating of Baa2 (Moody’s) and BBB (Standard and Poor) are both stable. As we looked at the Current Ratio of ONEOK (.75) it suggests that this company may have an issue with liquidity and meeting obligations that may come due. As we reviewed the consolidated…