“Trials and Verdict”
Angela Wiggins
Strayer University
CJR100
Shane’e Major-Kelly
August 24, 2014
County: Riverside
Convicted of: Forcible Rape, Forcible Oral Copulation, and Robbery
Year of Conviction: 1988
Sentence: 45 years
Year Released: 2000
Years Served: 11.5 years
Wrongful Conviction Factors: Mistaken eyewitness identification
Herman Atkins, a tall and poised man, is a blissful newlywed and pursuing a masters and doctoral degree in Psychology from California State University, Fresno. The son of a California Highway Patrol Officer, Herman has traveled the country and starred in an acclaimed documentary. By looking at him, you would never know that twelve years of Herman's life was stolen by the State of California. His adolescence cheated by the error of the criminal justice system, and only to be resolved over a decade later.
In 1986, Herman was a recent high school graduate, preparing to follow his admired father's footstep and join the military. A twisted set of events, however, prevented him from even experiencing his twenties.
Herman, now 40, was accused of raping a woman during a 1986 robbery in a Lake Elsinore shoe store. In 1988, the jury convicted him to forty-five years in prison. DNA testing was not available during his trial; however, in 1993, the Innocence project requested that the evidence be tested. The results were not surprising - the source of semen on the victim's sweater eliminated Herman as the source. The FBI lab confirmed these results.
Herman, the 70th person in North America freed from prison as a result of DNA testing, was release on February 18th, 2000, after serving almost 12 years for a crime he did not commit. The rapist was never caught.
"Only God and I knew my innocence," Herman tearfully stated on the day of his release. "Today, God, I, the Riverside District Attorney and the people of California and the United States know that I am an innocent man."
Herman currently lives in Fresno with his wife Machara. They have set up a small foundation, LIFE, to assist other recent exonerees with the basic necessities once they are released from prison. In addition to time, Herman laments on the opportunities robbed from him during those twelve years, "It robbed me of a relationship with my father, a relationship with my grandmother. It robbed me of any opportunity in life."
against former state Sen. Lowell Barron.
The ruling The Alabama Supreme Court ruled today against an appeal made by prosecutors in the case could be a prelude to the charges against Barron and co-defendant Rhonda Jill Johnson of Scottsboro being dismissed.
In a statement released after the ruling, Barron said he expected Attorney General Luther Strange to dismiss the charges.
"We are very pleased with the unanimous ruling today by the Supreme Court," Barron said in his statement. "This matter has now gone through the entire appellate process, including two appellate courts which have both ruled unanimously in our favor. Based on the attorney general's own statements to the court that Judge (Randall) Cole's 'Order will be fatal to the prosecution of these charges...' and the appellate courts now upholding that ruling today, this case should now be concluded.
"I take the attorney general as a man of his word and expect him to dismiss the case. I appreciate so much the kind words, thoughts and prayers I've received from so many all over the state."
The court unanimously upheld two lower court rulings on evidence that could be presented at the trial of Barron and Johnson that prosecutors from the state attorney general's office said was critical to their case.
Prosecutors wrote repeatedly in court documents that denying their appeal would be "fatal" to their case against Barron and Johnson.
Barron, once one of the state's most powerful politicians as a senator from Fyffe, and former longtime campaign
Related Documents: Historical: Appeal and Attorney General Essay
Same sex marriage On June 28, 2013, two days after the United States Supreme Court ruled that California’s proposition 8, aimed at banning on same sex marriage, is unconstitutional, the federal court of appeals for the Ninth US Circuit in San Francisco lifted the ban on same sex marriage in California today, ruling with immediate effect. California becomes the thirteenth legal same sex marriage states in United States. Historically, the view of majority rule impacts Americans, for there are…
itself does not manage any venues, but they have contract among venue managers. They select the venue based on several criterions, including physical specification, proximity to foot traffic area and regional demographics, competitive analysis and historical attendance numbers (“Premier Exhibitions (Touring & Marketing),” n.d.). The exhibition managers critically research financial, environmental and sociocultural aspects of the venue and determine the most suitable place to hold the exhibition…
clearly formulated ideas about the role of a national judicial system and its indispensability.” The Framers also debated the need for any federal courts below the Supreme Court. Some argued in favor of deciding all cases in state courts, with only appeals going before the Supreme Court. Others argued for a system of federal courts. A compromise left the final choice to Congress, and Article III, section 1, begins simply by vesting “The judicial Power of the United States…and in one supreme Court,…
Current Events Journal Jefferson, Luke 1) Article # 1 April 8th, 2014 5:52 P.M U.S. Attorney Asks Judge for Three Year Sentence for Former KPMG Partner http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702304819004579489874016223650?mg=reno64-wsj Scott London, former KPMG LLP partner, pleaded guilty for an insider-trading scheme violation that can put him in prison for up to three years. London, gave secret corporal information, regarding companies such as: Sketchers, and Herbalife, to a friend…
G1E1 The student will demonstrate understanding of the structure and functions of government and politics in the United States. Historical Documents Magna Carta (1215) First document that limited the government! Declaration of Independence (July 4, 1776) Helped to establish democratic ideals in America. Articles of Confederation The first government of the United States. Why did it fail as a government? States had the most power. The federal government…
figure, he says. The quality of indigent defense varies state to state, from quite good to reprehensible. Spangenberg says that it would cost the State of Florida, to cite one example, about $25 million a year to properly handle its backlog of capital appeals alone. Alan Berlow. The Atlantic Monthly; November 1999; The Wrong Man - 99.11 (Part Four); Volume 284, No. 5; page 66-91. N.p. 23 Feb. 2012 . B. “In early 1935 the City of Los Angeles established a Committee on Indigent Alien Transients…
physical or electronic that can be used to support the existence of a factual proposition. One of its main purposes is to protect the jury from being misled. There are two basic categories of evidence, direct and circumstantial. Within these general groups there exist three types of evidence: testimonial, physical, and demonstrative. Any kind of evidence to be considered in a legal context must comply with the admissibility requirements of relevancy and materiality. Direct evidence tends to…
situation was sorted out. Citigroup alleged that they had an exclusivity agreement with Wachovia that barred Wachovia from negotiating with other potential buyers. The injunction was overturned late in the evening on October 5, 2008, by New York state appeals court. Citigroup and Wells Fargo then entered into negotiations brokered by the FDIC to reach an amicable solution to the impasse. Those negotiations failed. Sources say that Citigroup was unwilling to take on more risk than the $42 billion that would…
Argued: Nov. 13, 14, 1933. Decided: Dec. 11, 1933. opinion, SUTHERLAND [HTML] Syllabus from 372 intentionally omitted Messrs. John W. Carter, Jr., of Danville, Va., and Charles A. Hammer, of Harrisonburg, Va., for petitioner. The Attorney General and Mr. Angus D. MacLean, Asst. Sol. Gen., of Washington, D.C., for the United States. TOP Mr. Justice SUTHERLAND delivered the opinion of the Court. The sole inquiry to be made in this case is whether in a federal court the wife of…