refer to: Popov vs. Hayashi, Swift vs. Gifford, Keron vs. Cashran Popov vs. Hayashi, Hayashi’s claim is compromised by Popov’s pre-possessory interest, Popov can’t demonstrate full physical control over the ball, however, this is because of the angry mob so giving the money to Hayashi would endorse this illegal activity. Giving the money to Popov would be unfair to Hayashi because Popov lacked the physical control over the ball. The decision, equitable division, very rare. Swift vs. Gifford…
Words 7821 - Pages 32