October 27th 2014
Does God exist?
Descartes’ fifth Meditation argument for God's existence relies on an untenable notion that existence is a perfection and that it can be predicated of God. I shall first explain what Descartes’ argument for God's existence is, and then present his argument in propositional form. I will then attempt to support the argument that existence is neither a perfection nor a predicate of God. In our thoughts we apprehend ideas of things. These ideas may reside entirely within our thoughts or they may exist independent of our considerations of them. Descartes argues that the idea of God is that He is infinite substance "eternal, immutable, independent, all-knowing, all-powerful" to which nothing more perfect can be imagined. Descartes defines the more perfect as "that which contains in itself more reality" so that there are gradations of perfection beginning with the subjective phantasms, such as a chimera, and culminating with the most perfect being in God Himself. Thus, because our idea of God is one of absolute perfection, and existence contains more reality than nonexistent thoughts alone, God exists. Descartes’ argument can be represented logically as: (1) in our thoughts we experience an idea of the most perfect being. (2) Existence in reality is more perfect than existence in our thoughts alone. Therefore, (3) the most perfect being exists in reality.
The ontological argument is the only a priori justification for God’s existence: that is, it does not depend upon our experience of the world to be verified, but instead relies upon purely logical inferences from the concept of God. It was adapted by Descartes in Meditation 5 and has been reformulated in recent times. The classical version comes from Anselm who addresses it to the fool in Psalm 14 who says in his heart, there is no God: ... “this very fool, when he hears of this being of which I speak – a being than which nothing greater can be conceived – understands what he hears, and what he understands is in his understanding; although he does not understand it to exist. For, it is one thing for an object to be in the understanding, and another to understand that the object exists... Hence, even the fool is convinced that something exists in the understanding, at least, than which nothing greater can be conceived... And assuredly that, than which nothing greater can be conceived, cannot exist in the understanding alone. For, suppose it exists in the understanding alone: then it can be conceived to exist in reality; which is greater. Therefore, if that, than which nothing greater can be conceived, exists in the understanding alone, the very being, than which nothing greater can be conceived, is one, than which a greater can be conceived. But obviously this is impossible. Hence, there is no doubt that there exists a being, than which nothing greater can be conceived, and it exists both in the understanding and in reality.”
The argument starts from the definition of God as ‘a being than which nothing greater can be conceived’. The fool understands this concept but believes that such a being does not exist. If it did exist, however, it would be greater than the concept alone: an existing being is greater than a mere idea. Therefore the fool is contradicting himself as he can conceive of a being greater than ‘a being than which nothing greater can be conceived’, one that actually exists. Anselm’s argument assumes the premise that God does not exist leads to a contradiction. Therefore, God must exist. Another way of putting this is to say that God necessarily exists. If God is ‘a being than which nothing greater can be conceived’, then he must exist by necessity as such a being is greater than a merely contingent one. Since the concept ‘God’ contains the notion of necessary existence, then the proposition ‘God exists’ must be analytic, in the same way that ‘bachelors are unmarried’ is analytic: the predicate (exists, unmarried) is already
whether or not God exists. This is the very question that has grasped the imagination of humanity since the birth of reason, and the same question that has plagued scientists and philosophers without coming close to an accepted conclusion. God is a word that means different things to different people. The definition for God, according to most monotheistic religions is the creator and ruler…
Argument Essay God Exists The existence of God has been debated by mankind all over the world for centuries. Belief, or non-belief, in God has destroyed families, and brought them together. Many people say they have experienced His presence in different ways, such as tragic or traumatic events. For me, God’s presence is the peace that He gives beyond my understanding, which is the absence of fear, anxiety, and worry that controls everyday life and situations. There are many different…
isn't a 'God' at all. There is no authenticated evidence to suggest that 'God' does exist. Whereas, there is more than enough evidence to support Darwin's theory. For example: human embryos, very early on in development, are almost identical to that of a fish. Embryos are clear signs of evolution as there are many similarities between human embryos and fish embryos, these are also almost identical to embryos of birds and reptiles, not just fish. The human eye is imperfect, if there was a 'God', surely…
The existence of God has been the subject of debate by philosophers, scientists, and for centuries. Three of these philosophers Anselm, Guanilo and Thomas of Aquinas explore some ideas on the topic of the existence of God. Anselm refers to Psalm 8 that says we need to seek God with our whole heart but he points out the fact we cannot see God so how can we seek God with our whole heart? Subsequently, Guanilo disagrees with Anselm’s comparison of God existence that leads them to go back and fourth…
Intro: The existence of God is one of the most basic yet complex questions raised in modern philosophy. Theists believe that a God does exist. Atheists believe in the exact opposite, that there is no god. Leaving agnostics to believe that there is no reason or proof that states that people should believe in one more than the other. Many arguments exist both confirming and refuting the existence of a god, most having counter-arguments that the premises with the conclusion of the argument. Numberless…
Proofs Anselm’s Ontological Argument for the Existence of God 1. Even someone who denies God exists must have a concept of what God is. 2. The term God means a being greater than which none greater exists 3. There are 2 ways something can exist: a. Only in the mind. b. Both in the mind and in the reality outside the mind. 4. It is greater to exist both in the mind and in reality than to exist only in the mind. 5. Therefore, God must exist both in the mind and in reality or he would not be the…
Long Tran Phil 1301 November 25, 2014 Quiz 4: Part II. The traditional arguments for God existence are the ontological argument and the cosmological argument. Begin with two out of five ways of the cosmological argument. The very first one is the way of Motion. According to Aquinas information, the motion is certain, and evident to our sense, that in the world some things are in motion. Now whatever is moved is moved by another, for nothing can be moved except it is in potentiality to that towards…
independently of, experience. 1. god is by definition the greatest being possible. 2. A being who fails to exist in the actual world (while existing in other possible worlds) is less perfect than a being who exists in all possible worlds. Hence, God exists, necessarily. “maybe an ant cant conceive of a greater creature than an anteater, but that doesn’t mean that anteaters are the most perfect possible beings. “conceivablepossible” Aquinas-all PKG god. ((((1. Motion. Objects in motion…
Aquinas debate the existence of God. Anselm one of the philosophers gives an example of God's presence with a comparison of God's existence to the painter's idea of the painting because the concept of the painting has always existed. In disagreement, someone could not compare the existence of God to a painter's artwork because they are not the same. Thomas Aquinas the other philosopher would argue in another way that everything that has breath for this reason God does exist. These three philosophers…
lead to, or support, belief in God. Firstly, a child’s parents will have told them that God is true (which is part of their marriage vows) and a child believes what their parents tell them. Secondly, a child that goes to Church will see so many people worshipping and praising God that the child is likely to think that God is real. Thirdly, if the child goes to a Catholic school they would have RE lessons in which the teachers will tell the child that God exists and a child believes what their…